It Is Argued That Expansionary Monetary Policy Of US Fed

It Is Argued That Expansionary Monetary Policy Of Us Fed And Other Cen

It is argued that expansionary monetary policy of US Fed and other central banks and the resulting near zero interest rates have caused bubbles and bursts. The logic behind this argument is that near zero interest rate encourages borrowing by risk loving investors who use cheap funds to finance excessively risky projects. But once the economy gets back to normal condition, interest rates start rising and these risky investments increase systematic risk. Many financial institutions who take exposure to these projects during low rate regimes have concentrated risk that could lead to systemic risk.

Paper For Above instruction

Expansive monetary policy implemented by the United States Federal Reserve (Fed) and other global central banks has been a focal point of economic debate, particularly concerning its potential to spawn financial bubbles and precipitate systemic risks. This paper discusses the validity of the claim that near-zero interest rates, maintained during periods of economic stimulation, foster an environment conducive to excessive risk-taking and asset bubbles, ultimately leading to financial instability. It further explores strategies to mitigate these inherent risks while maintaining the benefits of expansionary monetary policies.

The Rationale Behind Expansionary Monetary Policy and Asset Bubbles

Central banks, including the Fed, adopt expansionary monetary policies—such as lowering interest rates and engaging in quantitative easing—to stimulate economic growth, especially during downturns. When interest rates are near zero, borrowing costs are reduced, incentivizing investors and businesses to take on more debt to finance projects, investments, or asset purchases. This environment tends to attract risk-loving investors seeking higher returns in an environment of low yields on traditional safe assets like government bonds. Consequently, the increased demand for yield can lead to overvaluation of assets, creating bubbles in equity markets, real estate, and other sectors (Bernanke, 2013).

The Mechanics of Bubble Formation and Bursts

Low interest rates amplify the likelihood of bubble formation by encouraging speculative investment. Investors often underestimate risks, believing that continued monetary accommodation will sustain asset prices. The widespread participation in risky investments inflates asset prices beyond their intrinsic values, creating a bubble. When the central banks eventually tighten monetary policy—raising interest rates or signaling a shift away from support—these inflated prices can rapidly correct, leading to significant market corrections or crashes. Such bursting bubbles can have severe repercussions, including bank failures, credit crunches, and systemic crises (Gorton & Metrick, 2012).

Systemic Risks and Financial Institutions

Financial institutions, including banks and investment firms, may have significant exposure to bubbles and risky assets accumulated during periods of low interest rates. Concentrated risks arise from these exposures, especially if they hold assets that are overvalued. When asset prices correct sharply, institutions can face substantial losses, impairing their balance sheets and threatening financial stability. These risks are magnified by interconnectedness among financial institutions, leading to systemic risks where the failure or distress of one major player can cascade through the financial system (Acharya et al., 2013).

Evaluating the Merit of the Argument

The argument that near-zero interest rates foster bubbles and systemic risk has substantive merit. Empirical evidence suggests that prolonged periods of low interest rates correlate with increased asset prices and heightened market optimism, which can inflate bubbles. The financial crisis of 2007-2008 exemplifies how excessive risk-taking fueled by low interest rates and loose monetary conditions can culminate in systemic collapse (Bernanke, 2014). However, it is also important to recognize that low interest rates can support economic recovery and employment, posing a trade-off for policymakers.

Strategies to Mitigate Risks While Maintaining Expansionary Policies

To balance economic stimulation with financial stability, various measures can be adopted:

  • Macroprudential Regulation: Strengthening oversight of financial institutions, enforcing capital and liquidity requirements, and monitoring systemic risks can reduce the likelihood of bubble formations and mitigate contagion effects (BIS, 2011).
  • Gradual Policy Normalization: Phasing out low interest rates and communicating clear forward guidance can help markets adjust gradually, reducing sudden shocks (Eggertsson, 2014).
  • Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Implementing capital buffers that can be increased during periods of excess credit growth can help absorb shocks when bubbles burst (IMF, 2019).
  • Enhanced Monitoring and Data Collection: Improved surveillance of credit cycles, asset valuations, and leverage levels enables early detection of bubble risks (Svensson, 2015).
  • Global Coordination: As asset bubbles often have cross-border implications, international cooperation in regulation and policy responses can help contain systemic risks (Fischer et al., 2013).

Conclusion

While expansionary monetary policies are vital tools for economic recovery, their potential to contribute to financial bubbles and systemic risks necessitates a nuanced approach. Recognizing the mechanisms through which low interest rates can foster overleveraging and mispricing is essential for designing appropriate safeguards. Combining prudent macroprudential regulation, transparent communication, and gradual policy normalization can help mitigate systemic risks without compromising the economic benefits of expansionary policies. Ultimately, balancing these objectives requires vigilant oversight, international cooperation, and adaptive policy frameworks.

References

  • Acharya, V. V., Engle, R., & Richardson, M. (2013). On the Size Distribution of Financial Institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(11), 2776–2792.
  • Bernanke, B. S. (2013). The Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis. Princeton University Press.
  • Bernanke, B. S. (2014). Essays on the Great Recession. Princeton University Press.
  • BIS. (2011). The Role of Macroprudential Policies. Bank for International Settlements, Quarterly Review.
  • Eggertsson, G. B. (2014). What Fiscal Policy Is Effective at Zero Interest Rates? NBER Working Paper No. 20562.
  • Fischer, S., Borensztein, E., & Duenas, M. (2013). Macroprudential Policies in Emerging Markets: Where Do We Stand? International Journal of Central Banking, 9(3), 1–41.
  • Gorton, G., & Metrick, A. (2012). Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 425–451.
  • IMF. (2019). Global Financial Stability Report: Lower for Longer. International Monetary Fund.
  • Svensson, L. E. O. (2015). Implementing Optimal Policy: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 169–192.

Related Assignments