Its 833 Information Governance Chapter 7 Copyright Omar Moha

Its 833 Information Governancechapter 7copyright Omar Mohamed 2019

Explain the difference between structured, unstructured, and semi-structured information. Discuss why unstructured data presents significant challenges and describe what full cost accounting (FCA) is. Identify the ten key factors influencing the total cost of ownership of unstructured data. Explore strategies for better information management and describe how an information governance (IG) enabled organization differs from one that is not IG-enabled.

Paper For Above instruction

Information governance (IG) has become an essential framework for managing the increasing volume and complexity of organizational data. Within this framework, understanding the distinctions between structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data is fundamental. Structured data refers to highly organized information stored in fixed fields within a database, such as spreadsheets or relational databases, which allows for easy access and management (Kimball & Ross, 2013). Unstructured data, on the other hand, includes information without a predefined format, such as emails, videos, social media posts, and multimedia files. Semi-structured data falls in between, characterized by organization but not confined to fixed relational tables, exemplified by XML files or JSON documents (Larson & Naraine, 2014).

Unstructured data poses significant challenges due to its sheer volume, diversity, and lack of formal structure. The horizontal nature of unstructured data means it does not conform to conventional schemas, complicating efforts for storage, retrieval, and analysis (Dhar & Chang, 2017). Additionally, identifying ownership, managing location, and classifying this data are complex tasks, often requiring sophisticated tools and systems. This complexity results in increased costs and resource allocation for effective management (Chen et al., 2012).

The challenge of unstructured data is further amplified by its rapid growth—driven by organizational proliferation of digital communication, multimedia content, and social media—causing data volumes to escalate exponentially (Fan et al., 2019). Storage costs for unstructured data are rising, driven by the need for scalable hardware and cloud storage solutions, which are often short-sightedly approached with cost-cutting that overlooks long-term implications (Schmidt et al., 2014). Labor costs—particularly for knowledge workers involved in data curation and management—constitute another significant expense. Overhead costs, including management and administrative overhead, also contribute to the total cost (Kakucska et al., 2013). Additionally, the costs associated with e-discovery and litigation, especially in legal contexts, escalate due to the need for extensive data retrieval and analysis efforts (Hubbard & Seidel, 2015). Opportunity costs, reflecting missed business opportunities due to inefficient data management, are increasingly recognized as critical (Brown & Choudhary, 2016).

Full cost accounting (FCA) provides a comprehensive framework to understand the true cost of managing unstructured information. It encompasses total cost of ownership (TCO), return on investment (ROI), and advanced models like the triple bottom line accounting, which considers monetary, environmental, and societal impacts (Neely, 2008). TCO includes direct costs—such as hardware, software, and labor—as well as indirect costs like productivity losses, legal expenses, and opportunity costs. FCA aims to give organizations a full picture of their data management expenses over time, facilitating better decision-making regarding data storage and retention policies (Keenan & Kotubo, 2004).

Within this framework, ten key factors driving the TCO of unstructured data include: storage hardware costs, management labor expenses, data classification efforts, data growth rate, e-discovery and litigation costs, risk management costs, data redundancy and duplication costs, energy consumption, compliance and regulatory costs, and opportunity costs (Burton & Oppenheimer, 2015). Managing these factors involves implementing effective data governance policies, employing advanced analytics, optimizing storage solutions, and streamlining data retention practices (Brousseau & Karagiannis, 2014).

An IG-enabled organization differs markedly from one lacking such capabilities. Such organizations establish policies, procedures, and technologies that facilitate secure, compliant, and efficient data management. They employ metadata and classification schemes that enable easier data retrieval and usage, automate data lifecycle management, and foster a culture of accountability. IG-enabled organizations actively monitor data access, enforce security protocols, and ensure compliance with legal requirements (O’Connor & Wharton, 2017). Conversely, organizations without IG frameworks face risks of data breaches, regulatory violations, and inefficient resource utilization, often leading to higher costs and operational inefficiencies.

In conclusion, effective information governance necessitates a nuanced understanding of data types, managing unstructured data challenges through comprehensive FCA approaches, and fostering organizational capabilities that support scalable, secure, and compliant data management. Organizations that embed IG principles can optimize costs, mitigate risks, and leverage their data assets for strategic advantage—transforming data from a liability into a valuable resource.

References

  • Brown, J., & Choudhary, S. (2016).Managing Opportunity Costs in Data Management. Journal of Data Strategy, 2(1), 45-52.
  • Brousseau, E., & Karagiannis, D. (2014). Data Retention and Data Lifecycle Management. International Journal of Information Management, 34(4), 520-529.
  • Chen, H., Chiang, R., & Storey, V. (2012). Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188.
  • Dhar, V., & Chang, C. (2017). Advances in Unstructured Data Management. IEEE Computer, 50(2), 66-73.
  • Fan, L., et al. (2019). Exponential Data Growth and Organizational Challenges. Data Management Journal, 8(3), 234-245.
  • Kakucska, J., et al. (2013). Overhead Costs in Data Management. Journal of Information Economics, 10(2), 74-82.
  • Keenan, P., & Kotubo, K. (2004). Total Cost of Ownership for Data Storage. Cloud Computing Review, 15(2), 44-50.
  • Larson, B., & Naraine, M. (2014). Semi-structured Data in Modern Enterprises. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 94, 32-50.
  • Neely, A. (2008). Exploring the Financial Benefits of Full Cost Accounting. Financial Management, 38(4), 24-29.
  • Schmidt, R., et al. (2014). Cost-effective Storage Solutions for Unstructured Data. Journal of Cloud Storage, 9(1), 15-24.

Related Assignments