Its 835 Chapters 30, 31, 34 Miscellaneous Case Studies On Er

Its 835chapters 30 31 34miscellaneous Case Studies On Erm And Risk

Its 835chapters 30 31 34miscellaneous Case Studies On Erm And Risk

This document encompasses three case studies related to enterprise risk management (ERM) across different organizations and scenarios. The first case, Alleged Corruption at Chessfield, examines governance, risk protocols, and organizational culture within a private American sports and entertainment company. The second case, Bon Boulangerie, explores operational risks involved in strategic expansion of a bakery business. The third case, Building an ERM Program at General Motors, discusses the development, implementation, and future direction of ERM practices in a large automotive corporation. These cases serve to highlight real-world implications, common themes, challenges, and lessons in ERM practices across varying organizational contexts.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is an integrated, holistic approach to identifying, assessing, and managing risks that could impede an organization’s strategic objectives. The three case studies presented—Alleged Corruption at Chessfield, Bon Boulangerie, and General Motors’ ERM program—provide practical insights into the complexities of implementing ERM practices across diverse organizational settings. Each case highlights different risk themes: governance and organizational culture, operational expansion risks, and strategic ERM structure, respectively. Analyzing these cases demonstrates common challenges and offers tailored strategies to improve risk oversight, operational success, and strategic resilience.

Case 1: Alleged Corruption at Chessfield

Chessfield, a private U.S.-based company operating in sports and entertainment, presents a unique case of governance deficiencies and risk oversight gaps. The company's informal governance structure, characterized by a "good ol’ boys" board and high CEO compensation, created an environment susceptible to excessive risk-taking. The whistle-blower's allegations prompted a governance review that uncovered minimal documentation, questionable decision-making processes, and a lack of industry-standard risk management protocols. The review resulted in 45 recommendations, most of which were accepted, including the resignation of a long-serving board member and the appointment of a female director to enhance diversity and oversight.

The situation underscores the importance of formalizing governance structures, implementing comprehensive documentation, and establishing independent risk management protocols. The environment at Chessfield—marked by informal decision-making, limited transparency, and high risk appetite—heightens exposure to unethical behaviors and operational risks. To mitigate such issues, regulators should advocate for strengthened governance codes, rigorous internal controls, and independent oversight mechanisms. Furthermore, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability is vital, emphasizing the role of whistle-blower protections and regular risk assessments to prevent corrupt practices and safeguard organizational integrity.

Case 2: Bon Boulangerie

Bon Boulangerie, a bakery expanding from a single retail location in Ontario to a broader wholesale operation, illustrates operational risks during strategic growth. Ray Pane’s strategic objective—tripling profits within three years—relies on scaling operations efficiently while maintaining product quality and customer satisfaction. The key operational objectives include expanding the wholesale reach from 20 km to 120 km, adding product lines, and including grocery stores in distribution channels. Achieving these goals necessitates robust internal capabilities such as optimized supply chain processes, skilled personnel, and scalable IT systems, as well as external factors like reliable logistics, supplier partnerships, and market demand.

Operational risks driving uncertainty encompass supply chain disruptions, quality control failures, workforce management challenges, and market competition. The risks associated with rapid expansion include logistical bottlenecks, inconsistent product quality, and reduced responsiveness to customer needs. To manage these risks effectively, Bon Boulangerie must develop comprehensive operational risk assessments, build resilient supply chains, and invest in staff training. Strategic planning should incorporate contingency plans and flexible processes to adapt swiftly to unforeseen disruptions, aligning internal capabilities with external market dynamics for successful execution.

Case 3: Building an ERM Program at General Motors

General Motors (GM) embarked on developing a formal ERM program in 2010 amid restructuring following bankruptcy. The company's approach emphasized embedding risk management into its strategic vision of designing, building, and selling top-tier vehicles. GM's use of a bottom-up approach, involving senior executives in risk assessments, and tiered risk rankings fostered a culture of comprehensive risk awareness. The integration of game theory principles aimed to anticipate external threats and market dynamics, enhancing strategic resilience.

Pros of having risk officers as part-time assignments include flexibility, resource allocation efficiency, and fostering risk awareness across functions without overburdening dedicated teams. However, cons include potential lack of deep expertise, inconsistent risk culture, and fragmented efforts. Full-time dedicated risk officers may provide more consistent oversight but risk isolating risk management from operational realities.

An example of strategy failure due to ignoring external actions is Nokia’s decline in the smartphone market, attributed to underestimating competitors like Apple and Android. Companies often need a crisis to recognize the importance of risk, but proactive ERM can prevent such crises. Cultivating a risk-aware culture before crisis strikes ensures resilience, agility, and strategic alignment. For GM, ongoing development of operational controls and a policy-based self-assessment program aim to embed risk considerations into daily decision-making, underscoring the importance of continuous risk vigilance.

Conclusion

The case studies reveal that effective ERM requires formal governance structures, integration into strategic planning, proactive identification of operational risks, and a risk-aware culture. Organizations must tailor ERM frameworks to their unique contexts, balancing oversight with operational agility. Emphasizing transparency, accountability, and strategic foresight enhances resilience against internal and external threats, ensuring sustained organizational success.

References

  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Fraser, J., & Simkins, B. (2010). Enterprise Risk Management: Today's Leading Research and Best Practices for Tomorrow's Executives. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to Controls. Wiley.
  • Singleton, K. J. (2022). Managing Organizational Risks: Strategies for Resilience. Harvard Business Review.
  • Mikes, A. (2011). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 48-56.
  • Power, M. (2007). Organizing Risk Management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4-5), 451-490.
  • Gordon, L. A., & Palia, D. (2006). The Impact of Risk Management on Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 295-314.
  • McShane, M. K., Nair, L., & Rubinstein, A. (2011). Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 123-136.
  • Sullivan, M. (2010). The Role of Corporate Governance in Corporate Risk Management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 331-344.
  • Vaughan, D., & Vaughan, S. (2014). Fundamentals of Risk Management (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Related Assignments