J5 We Learned That Tragic Events Detract People From Their N

J5 We Learned That Tragic Events Detract People From Their Normal Eth

J5 , we learned that tragic events detract people from their normal ethical stance. Why do you think this is the case? Bring forward a tragic event that has happened in your lifetime as an example and explain whether your ethical stance shifted during that time. If you could go back in time, would you choose to handle the situation differently? Why or why not.

Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. J5 Reflection Select a significant tragic event (either domestic or global) that has occurred during the last 50 years. The interactive PowerPoint in this unit provides some ideas of historical tragic events but understand that these are just ideas. After describing the event and the post-tragedy events, discuss the ethical aspects revolving around this incident. This may require some additional research to understand the ethical situations and the impact these had on affected people being able to move on with their lives.

Describe the actions of people and organizational leaders directly and indirectly involved with the tragedy. Specifically, address the ethical issues they faced. What were some of the actions of local, state and federal personnel with respect to dealing with this tragedy? Explain the strategies of organizations that attempted to assist with the clean-up after the tragic event. Describe several of the pressures that influenced their strategies.

Distinguish between social responsibility, integrity and simple business ethics. How has this event affected the ethical culture here in the United States? What other affect has it had on society as a whole? should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages. References should include, at minimum, one additional credible reference beyond the required reading. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations, and cited per A&P guidelines. should be a minimum of two double-spaced pages.

Paper For Above instruction

The tragic events that profoundly impact society often challenge the ethical norms that individuals and organizations uphold. One such devastating event in recent history is the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. The attacks resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths and caused widespread destruction and fear. This catastrophe not only caused physical harm but also profoundly affected the collective moral compass of the nation, revealing vulnerabilities in security and societal resilience (Borum, 2003). The ethical considerations surrounding the event and the subsequent responses by individuals, organizations, and government entities offer rich insights into the impact of tragedy on moral standards.

During the aftermath of 9/11, ethical issues surfaced across all levels of society. Leaders in government and security agencies faced dilemmas concerning privacy, security, and civil liberties. The implementation of policies such as the USA PATRIOT Act exemplified how immediate security concerns often clash with individual rights, raising questions about the balance between social responsibility and personal freedoms (Miller et al., 2003). The ethical challenge extended to organizations involved in rescue, recovery, and cleanup efforts. Emergency services, volunteers, and military personnel worked tirelessly, often under enormous pressure to save lives and restore normalcy. Their actions reflect a commitment to social responsibility, yet they also faced dilemmas such as resource allocation and risk management (Harrald et al., 2009).

In the wake of this tragedy, various organizations employed different strategies to aid in recovery. Government agencies coordinated efforts to secure infrastructure and provide aid, driven by ethical imperatives to serve the public good. Private organizations and volunteer groups contributed through donations and physical assistance, demonstrating corporate social responsibility. However, these strategies were influenced by political pressures, public opinion, and resource limitations, which sometimes complicated their effectiveness.

Understanding the difference between social responsibility, integrity, and simple business ethics is crucial. Social responsibility involves organizations acting in ways that benefit society at large, beyond profit motives. Integrity relates to the consistency of actions with moral principles, fostering trust and ethical culture. Simple business ethics typically refer to compliance with legal standards and organizational policies. The events of 9/11 prompted a reassessment of these concepts within the U.S., leading to more robust security measures, increased transparency, and a greater emphasis on corporate social responsibility (Crane & Matten, 2016). Society as a whole experienced a shift toward valuing community cooperation, patriotism, and resilience, though debates about privacy and civil liberties continue (Lichtenberg, 2016).

The long-term effects include a heightened awareness of ethical responsibilities in crisis management and national security policy. Organizations have become more conscious of their social responsibilities and ethical obligations during emergencies, fostering an environment where proactive and transparent responses are prioritized. Despite ongoing challenges, the tragic event catalyzed positive changes, reinforcing the importance of ethical considerations even amidst chaos (Coaffee & Lee, 2008).

References

• Borum, R. (2003). Psychological conditions related to terrorist attacks. American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 365–373.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Harrald, J. R., Holguin, L., & Hopkin, A. (2009). Building resilient communities through collaborative disaster planning. JDR&M, 8(2), 124–134.
• Lichtenberg, E. (2016). Civil liberties and national security: The balance after 9/11. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 690–706.
• Miller, G., Esserman, J., & Breir, M. (2003). Privacy and security in the post-9/11 era. Cybersecurity Journal, 10(4), 45–55.