Job Order Costing And Relative Value Units Reference

Sheet1job Order Costing And Relative Value Unitsu2 Reference Lab Must

Calculate the relative value and cost per procedure given that the total lab expense is $943,241. The projected procedure volumes are as follows: Procedure A: 0.15, B: 0.20, C: 0.10, D: 0.05, E: 0.15, F: 0.25, G: 0.10.

Part 1: Calculate the Relative Value Units for each procedure.

Part 2: Calculate the total Relative Value Units for all procedures.

Part 3: Calculate the cost per procedure based on the relative value units.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this analysis is to determine the relative value units and cost per procedure in a laboratory setting, facilitating equitable cost allocation based on procedure complexity and resource consumption. Given the total laboratory expense of $943,241 and the projected procedure volumes, this paper systematically calculates the necessary metrics to inform cost management and operational efficiency.

Introduction

In healthcare and laboratory settings, accurate cost allocation is essential for financial planning, resource management, and reimbursement strategies. Procedure-based costing employs the concept of Relative Value Units (RVUs) to allocate costs proportionally based on the relative effort, time, and resources each procedure requires. This method ensures a fair distribution of total costs across different procedures, aiding administrators and decision-makers in optimizing laboratory operations.

Calculating Relative Value Units

Relative Value Units serve as a standardized metric to compare diverse procedures based on their relative workload. To compute RVUs for each procedure, the projected volume percentage is divided by the total of these percentages, normalized to sum to 1. The procedure volumes provided are as follows: A (0.15), B (0.20), C (0.10), D (0.05), E (0.15), F (0.25), G (0.10). These are representative of the expected procedure mix.

First, we confirm the sum of projected volumes:

  • Sum = 0.15 + 0.20 + 0.10 + 0.05 + 0.15 + 0.25 + 0.10 = 1.00

Since the sum equals 1, each procedure's relative value unit can be calculated directly as its volume percentage, which effectively standardizes the RVUs. For clarity, the formula used is:

RVU for Procedure = Procedure Volume Percentage

Thus, the relative value units for each procedure are:

  • A: 0.15
  • B: 0.20
  • C: 0.10
  • D: 0.05
  • E: 0.15
  • F: 0.25
  • G: 0.10

Calculating Total Relative Value Units

The total RVUs are obtained by summing individual RVUs:

  • Total RVU = 0.15 + 0.20 + 0.10 + 0.05 + 0.15 + 0.25 + 0.10 = 1.00

The total RVU value is 1.00, reflecting the total normalized workload across all procedures. This sum provides the basis for proportional cost allocation.

Calculating Cost per Procedure

The overall laboratory expense is $943,241. To allocate costs based on RVUs, each procedure's share of costs is proportional to its RVU relative to the total RVUs.

The formula for cost per procedure is:

Cost per Procedure = (Procedure RVU / Total RVU) x Total Lab Expense

Since the total RVU sum is 1.00, this simplifies to:

Cost per Procedure = Procedure RVU x Total Lab Expense

Therefore, the specific costs are:

  • Procedure A: 0.15 x $943,241 = $141,486.15
  • Procedure B: 0.20 x $943,241 = $188,648.20
  • Procedure C: 0.10 x $943,241 = $94,324.10
  • Procedure D: 0.05 x $943,241 = $47,162.05
  • Procedure E: 0.15 x $943,241 = $141,486.15
  • Procedure F: 0.25 x $943,241 = $235,810.25
  • Procedure G: 0.10 x $943,241 = $94,324.10

Conclusion

This detailed allocation of costs based on relative value units allows the laboratory to distribute expenses fairly among procedures according to their expected resource utilization. The proportional approach ensures that procedures consuming more resources bear a higher share of the total cost, facilitating better financial management and operational decision-making within the laboratory environment.

References

  • Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press.
  • Muller, D. P. (2017). Cost allocation in medical laboratories: principles and practice. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 31(4), e22184.
  • American Medical Association. (2020). Coding and Reimbursement for Laboratory Procedures. AMA Press.
  • Finkler, S. A., & Calabrese, T. (2019). Financial Management for Hospital Orders and Procedures. Health Administration Press.
  • Ginsburg, P. B. (2013). The economic implications of relative value units. Health Economics Journal, 22(9), 1030-1043.
  • Hollenbeak, C. S., & Laska, E. M. (2018). Cost analysis methodology in healthcare. Medical Care Research and Review, 75(2), 147-169.
  • Kocher, R., & Ramachandran, S. (2020). Cost-based reimbursement in healthcare: approaches and limitations. Health Affairs, 39(5), 772-779.
  • Zhang, X., & Wu, B. (2019). Application of relative value units in laboratory cost management. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 12(3), 229-234.
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2021). Guidelines for Procedure Cost Allocation. CMS Documentation.
  • Harper, P. R., & Hu, L. (2016). A review of costing methodologies in health services. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 14(1), 26.

Related Assignments