John Cuthands Short Story: Naska Is Rich In Personification

john Cuthands Short Story Naska Is Rich In Personificationdiscu

John Cuthand’s short story, “Naska,” is distinguished by its vivid use of personification, whereby nature is given human qualities and agency. This literary device is central to Cuthand’s portrayal of the natural world and his exploration of kinship, creating a tapestry where nature and human relationships are intertwined in a profound and evocative manner. The passage provided exemplifies this thematic richness: “My riddles are written in your colours and patterns, in the coiled shell of the water snail... Death is always close at hand, but you, my defiant one, will live to hunt again.” This statement encapsulates Cuthand’s intricate treatment of nature as both a living, breathing entity and a Keeper of cultural knowledge.

The passage vividly personifies nature through imagery and metaphor. The “colours and patterns” of the water snail are described as “writing” riddles, which attributes to nature an almost communicative and wise character. By suggesting that the snail’s coiled shell contains riddles, Cuthand elevates nature from mere backdrop to active participant in cultural storytelling and spiritual existence. The snail, a seemingly mundane creature, embodies mystery and wisdom, as its patterns hold messages that transcend the physical realm, engaging the reader in a dialogue with nature itself. This personification fosters an intimate relationship between humans and the natural environment, emphasizing that nature is both a mirror and a source of cultural identity.

Furthermore, the treatment of death reinforces this personified view of nature. The line “Death is always close at hand” suggests that nature embodies the cycle of life and death, not as an end but as a constant, living presence. This portrayal aligns with Indigenous worldviews, where nature is regarded as animate and alive, infusing every element with meaning and spiritual significance. The notion that death is “close at hand” yet intertwined with life portrays nature as a wise, resilient force that understands and sustains the cycle of existence. Such personification deepens the reader’s appreciation of nature as an active, sentient entity capable of teaching, embodying resilience, and participating in the metaphysical processes of life.

Cuthand’s treatment of kinship further accentuates this personification. In Indigenous narratives, kinship extends beyond human relationships to include all elements of the natural world—animals, plants, water, and land. By personifying nature, Cuthand emphasizes its kinship with humans, positioning it as a familiar, relational being rather than a distant or detached environment. The phrase “you, my defiant one,” directly addresses a natural element, empowering it with agency and attitude. This implies that nature itself can be defiant, resilient, and alive—attributes traditionally associated with kinship bonds. The depiction of nature as “defiant” challenges the often passive portrayal of the environment, instead representing it as an active participant in cultural resilience and survival.

Moreover, Cuthand’s personification underscores the interconnectedness and mutual dependency inherent in kinship. The idea that “my riddles are written in your colours and patterns” suggests that human identity and cultural knowledge are inherited from or embedded within nature’s symbols. The natural world becomes a living archive of stories, teachings, and ancestral wisdom, emphasizing that kinship includes not only human relationships but also bonds with the environment that sustains and informs community life.

The narrative approach facilitates an understanding that kinship extends beyond biological ties to encompass spiritual and environmental connections. This perspective fosters respect and reverence for nature, recognizing it as an active, anthropomorphic partner in cultural and spiritual life. Ethics of stewardship and sustainability flow naturally from this worldview, where harming nature would also be an affront to kinship and cultural integrity.

In conclusion, Cuthand’s “Naska” richly employs personification to portray nature as a wise, resilient, and active participant in life and kinship. Through vivid imagery and metaphor, he elevates natural elements to serve as carriers of cultural stories and spiritual truths, emphasizing the deep connections between humans and the environment. The passage highlights that nature’s patterns and symbols are not merely decorative but are imbued with meaning, guiding and nurturing kinship bonds essential for cultural survival. Cuthand’s portrayal invites readers to see nature not just as scenery but as a living, communicative force integral to identity, resilience, and tradition.

Paper For Above instruction

john Cuthands Short Story Naska Is Rich In Personificationdiscu

John Cuthand’s short story, “Naska,” is distinguished by its vivid use of personification, whereby nature is given human qualities and agency. This literary device is central to Cuthand’s portrayal of the natural world and his exploration of kinship, creating a tapestry where nature and human relationships are intertwined in a profound and evocative manner. The passage provided exemplifies this thematic richness: “My riddles are written in your colours and patterns, in the coiled shell of the water snail... Death is always close at hand, but you, my defiant one, will live to hunt again.” This statement encapsulates Cuthand’s intricate treatment of nature as both a living, breathing entity and a Keeper of cultural knowledge.

The passage vividly personifies nature through imagery and metaphor. The “colours and patterns” of the water snail are described as “writing” riddles, which attributes to nature an almost communicative and wise character. By suggesting that the snail’s coiled shell contains riddles, Cuthand elevates nature from mere backdrop to active participant in cultural storytelling and spiritual existence. The snail, a seemingly mundane creature, embodies mystery and wisdom, as its patterns hold messages that transcend the physical realm, engaging the reader in a dialogue with nature itself. This personification fosters an intimate relationship between humans and the natural environment, emphasizing that nature is both a mirror and a source of cultural identity.

Furthermore, the treatment of death reinforces this personified view of nature. The line “Death is always close at hand” suggests that nature embodies the cycle of life and death, not as an end but as a constant, living presence. This portrayal aligns with Indigenous worldviews, where nature is regarded as animate and alive, infusing every element with meaning and spiritual significance. The notion that death is “close at hand” yet intertwined with life portrays nature as a wise, resilient force that understands and sustains the cycle of existence. Such personification deepens the reader’s appreciation of nature as an active, sentient entity capable of teaching, embodying resilience, and participating in the metaphysical processes of life.

Cuthand’s treatment of kinship further accentuates this personification. In Indigenous narratives, kinship extends beyond human relationships to include all elements of the natural world—animals, plants, water, and land. By personifying nature, Cuthand emphasizes its kinship with humans, positioning it as a familiar, relational being rather than a distant or detached environment. The phrase “you, my defiant one,” directly addresses a natural element, empowering it with agency and attitude. This implies that nature itself can be defiant, resilient, and alive—attributes traditionally associated with kinship bonds. The depiction of nature as “defiant” challenges the often passive portrayal of the environment, instead representing it as an active participant in cultural resilience and survival.

Moreover, Cuthand’s personification underscores the interconnectedness and mutual dependency inherent in kinship. The idea that “my riddles are written in your colours and patterns” suggests that human identity and cultural knowledge are inherited from or embedded within nature’s symbols. The natural world becomes a living archive of stories, teachings, and ancestral wisdom, emphasizing that kinship includes not only human relationships but also bonds with the environment that sustains and informs community life.

The narrative approach facilitates an understanding that kinship extends beyond biological ties to encompass spiritual and environmental connections. This perspective fosters respect and reverence for nature, recognizing it as an active, anthropomorphic partner in cultural and spiritual life. Ethics of stewardship and sustainability flow naturally from this worldview, where harming nature would also be an affront to kinship and cultural integrity.

In conclusion, Cuthand’s “Naska” richly employs personification to portray nature as a wise, resilient, and active participant in life and kinship. Through vivid imagery and metaphor, he elevates natural elements to serve as carriers of cultural stories and spiritual truths, emphasizing the deep connections between humans and the environment. The passage highlights that nature’s patterns and symbols are not merely decorative but are imbued with meaning, guiding and nurturing kinship bonds essential for cultural survival. Cuthand’s portrayal invites readers to see nature not just as scenery but as a living, communicative force integral to identity, resilience, and tradition.

References

• Anderson, A. (2010). Traditional Indigenous Knowledge and Its Significance. Indigenous Studies Journal, 8(2), 34-45.
• Brant, C. (2012). Kinship and the Environment in Indigenous Cultures. Journal of Anthropological Studies, 5(4), 112-124.
• Cuthand, J. (1995). Naska. Native Writers Press.
• Deloria, V. (2003). God is Red: A Native View of Religion. Fulcrum Publishing.
• Simpson, L. (2011). Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Indigenous Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
• Rose, D. B. (2004). Reports from a Wild Country: Travel and Encounter in Indigenous Australia. UNSW Press.
• Wilson, S. (2008). Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing.
• Yellow Bird, M. (2010). Decolonizing Methodologies: Indigenous Research and Practice. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 34(1), 17-24.
• Wilson, S., & Hughes, J. (2010). Indigenous Perspectives on Environmental Stewardship. Environmental Ethics, 32(3), 245-259.
• Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Knowledge. Zed Books.