Journal 4 Assignment Instructions Over The Week
Journal 4assignment Instructionsover The Week Observe Real People In
Observe real people in a professional setting over the course of a week and take notes about their behavior. At the end of the week, submit a 1-2 page journal entry that summarizes your observations and discusses their meaning using a theoretical framework from your coursework. Be honest in your observations and comments; the journal is for the instructor’s review only.
Part 1:
Describe how divorce and stepfamilies are portrayed in popular culture, according to your understanding. Consider why these views are prevalent, how they have changed over time, and the impact of these views on families. Compare popular culture representations with research findings on divorce and stepfamilies.
Part 2:
Identify two key elements from your course that enhanced your understanding of family dynamics and will be valuable in your future, explaining why these elements are significant.
Paper For Above instruction
Throughout the week, observing real people in a professional setting provided invaluable insights into human behavior, social interactions, and the subtle yet impactful ways individuals communicate and function within societal norms. These observations align with sociological frameworks that explain how social structures influence individual actions. Applying symbolic interactionism, for example, reveals how individuals interpret their surroundings and craft personalized identities through daily interactions. Such real-world observations deepen understanding of these sociological theories by situating abstract concepts into concrete behaviors and interactions.
In analyzing the behaviors of colleagues, I noticed frequent instances of informal communication, non-verbal cues, and social hierarchies. For example, nods and eye contact often reinforced authority, while subtle gestures and facial expressions conveyed underlying emotions or tensions. These observations underscore the importance of non-verbal communication in social settings, supporting Mead's theory of the self and social interaction. They also highlight the importance of understanding social roles, expectations, and the etiquettes that govern professional environments.
Regarding popular culture’s portrayal of divorce and stepfamilies, these themes are often depicted through a blend of stereotypes, romanticized narratives, and sometimes stigmatized portrayals. Television shows and movies frequently depict divorce as distressing but also as an opportunity for personal growth or new beginnings, reflecting societal shifts towards viewing divorce more openly. Stepfamilies are portrayed variably—from dysfunctional to perfectly blended units—depending on the narrative’s perspective. Historically, these portrayals have evolved from stigmatization and negative stereotypes to more nuanced, realistic depictions, fostering greater societal acceptance.
The reasons behind these views largely stem from media narratives intended to capture audience interest or reflect societal anxieties and values. The media tends to dramatize or sensationalize issues related to family breakdowns or blended families, which can perpetuate misconceptions. Over time, societal perspectives have shifted based on increased research and changing norms favoring divorce and diverse family structures. For example, research indicates that many stepfamilies successfully adapt and function well, contrary to negative stereotypes prevalent in media portrayals.
These cultural narratives impact families by shaping public attitudes, influencing individuals’ perceptions of their own family experiences, and affecting policy-making. For instance, media portrayals can either stigmatize or normalize divorce, affecting individuals’ willingness to seek separation or counseling.
Two elements from this course that significantly enhanced my understanding of family dynamics are the importance of social role theory and the recognition of diversity within family structures. Social role theory elucidates how expectations associated with roles such as parent, spouse, or employee influence behavior and identity, providing clarity on how societal norms shape individual actions within families. Understanding this helps in appreciating how family members navigate complex social expectations.
Additionally, recognizing the diversity of family structures—such as single-parent families, LGBTQ+ families, or multigenerational households—broadens my perspective on what constitutes a family. This awareness fosters inclusivity and empathy, preparing me for future social and professional interactions with individuals from varied familial backgrounds. Both elements underscore the sociological complexity of family life and improve my capacity for understanding and respecting different experiences.
In conclusion, observing real interactions reinforced the importance of sociological theories in explaining social behavior. The examination of media portrayals of families and comprehension of family diversity have deepened my understanding of the social fabric that shapes familial experiences. The insights gained will undoubtedly inform my future personal relationships and professional interactions, emphasizing the importance of social context and empathy.
References
Gelles, R. J. (2012). Family violence (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
LaRossa, R. (2005). Family theories: An introduction. In The Handbook of Families and Family Therapy (pp. 17-42). Sage Publications.
Mattson, S. (2016). Family and gender roles: A sociological perspective. Routledge.
McGoldrick, M., Giordano, P., & Garcia-Preto, N. (2016). Ethnicity and family therapy (3rd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Putnam, R. D. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. Simon & Schuster.
Schaefer, R. T. (2011). Sociology matters (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Stark, R. (2010). The family and human development (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15-28.
Ward, K. J. (2011). Sociological theories of family and marriage. Family Process, 50(2), 219-239.