Journal Responsibilities To The Larger Community
9 2 Journal Responsibilities To The Larger Communityassignmentreflect
Reflect on the responsibilities you noted in your journal in Module Seven. How do these compare to your responsibilities to the larger community? Should a leader use the power he or she holds within an organization to benefit the larger community? How and when? Can you think of any ethical dilemmas that could result?
Submit your assignment here. Make sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the guidelines and rubric.
Paper For Above instruction
The responsibilities of individuals and leaders extend beyond personal or organizational boundaries to encompass a broader societal context, emphasizing ethical considerations, social impact, and community well-being. Reflecting on responsibilities outlined in personal journals, particularly those from Module Seven, highlights that individual accountability often aligns with a commitment to fostering positive communal relations and contributing to societal advancement. When comparing personal responsibilities with those owed to the larger community, it becomes evident that effective leadership entails a proactive role in societal betterment, often through ethical decision-making and strategic use of influence.
Leaders within organizations possess significant power that, if wielded responsibly, can substantially benefit the wider community. Ethical leadership necessitates the conscientious use of this power to promote social good, support community development, and address societal issues. For example, corporate social responsibility initiatives, community outreach programs, and sustainable practices exemplify how organizational influence can extend benefits beyond internal stakeholders to society at large. Such actions are most effectively employed when they align with the organization’s core values and strategic objectives, and when they are timely—addressing pressing social issues or crises that demand immediate and impactful intervention.
However, using organizational power for community benefit introduces complex ethical dilemmas. A primary concern is balancing organizational interests with societal needs, ensuring that efforts to help do not inadvertently cause harm or be perceived as superficial or insincere. For instance, corporate initiatives might be scrutinized for "virtue signaling" or for diverting attention from less ethical practices within the organization. Additionally, leaders face dilemmas regarding resource allocation—deciding whether to prioritize internal growth or community projects, especially when resources are limited. The potential for conflicts of interest, unintended consequences, or the exploitation of community goodwill presents challenges that require careful ethical analysis.
Moreover, ethical dilemmas may arise from the tension between short-term gains and long-term community benefits. For example, a company might consider cutting corners to increase profitability, which could harm community health or the environment. Leaders must weigh immediate organizational benefits against broader social responsibilities, often making difficult choices that test their ethical principles and leadership integrity. Transparency, stakeholder engagement, and a strong ethical foundation are crucial in navigating these dilemmas, ensuring that actions taken are genuinely beneficial and ethically sound.
In conclusion, the responsibilities of leaders extend to actively advocating for and contributing to the well-being of the larger community. The power held within organizations should be used ethically and intentionally to foster societal progress, especially during critical moments or social issues. While ethical dilemmas are inevitable in this process, they can be mitigated through principled leadership, transparent decision-making, and committed engagement with community stakeholders. Ultimately, responsible leadership that prioritizes societal benefit reinforces ethical standards and builds trust, ensuring that organizational influence contributes positively to the broader community fabric.
References
- Denning, S. (2015). The leader's guide to corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 93(1), 66-73.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Hartman, L. P., & DesJardins, J. R. (2011). Business ethics: Decision making for personal integrity and social justice (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by avoiding the table of virtues. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 263-289.
- Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 296-306.
- Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Responsible leadership: Ethical decision-making and organizational accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 565-577.
- Robinson, P. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in leadership: Balancing power and responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 857-867.
- Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Ethical leadership and social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1509-1524.
- Singh, P., & Schrage, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder management. California Management Review, 52(2), 54-72.
- Walsh, J. P. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder engagement. Business and Society, 51(1), 1-16.