Julia Is A 9-Year-Old Student At Blackmore Elementary 171523

Julia is a 9-year-old student at Blackmore Elementary You Have Been A

You have been asked by your professor to help Julia, a 9-year-old student at Blackmore Elementary, reduce the frequency of her hand-raising behavior in class using a differential reinforcement strategy. The teacher has recorded Julia raising her hand an average of 57 times per hour. The goal is to identify an appropriate differential reinforcement procedure, explain why it is suitable, and describe how it would be implemented based on research and evidence-based practices in behavior management.

Paper For Above instruction

Reducing the excessive frequency of Julia's hand-raising in class requires a well-considered behavioral intervention grounded in evidence-based principles. Differential reinforcement involves selectively reinforcing desired behaviors while withholding reinforcement for undesired behaviors. In Julia’s case, the focus is on decreasing the repeated hand-raising that may interfere with instructional time and other students’ learning experiences.

A particularly effective differential reinforcement procedure for this scenario is differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). DRO entails reinforcing Julia whenever she refrains from hand-raising for a specified interval, thereby encouraging her to engage in alternative, more appropriate behaviors. This approach is supported by research demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing problematic behaviors by decreasing reinforcement for undesired behaviors and providing reinforcement contingent upon the absence of these behaviors (Carr, 2016).

The implementation of DRO involves selecting an appropriate interval—initially relatively short, such as 5 minutes—and reinforcing Julia if she does not raise her hand during that period. Over time, the interval size can be gradually increased to promote sustained behavioral change. For example, if Julia successfully refrains from hand-raising for five minutes, she might earn a reward or praise, which serves as positive reinforcement and increases the likelihood of continued compliance. If she raises her hand during the interval, the timer resets, and she is not reinforced until the next interval is completed successfully.

This procedure is based on the principle of extinction of the undesired behavior—hand-raising—by removing the reinforcement that may be inadvertently maintaining it. Instead, the reinforcement is delivered for the absence of the behavior, thereby shifting her motivation toward alternative behaviors that are more desirable. Furthermore, the use of consistent, immediate reinforcement strengthens the association between the alternative behavior and positive consequences, encouraging Julia to adopt more appropriate classroom behaviors.

Moreover, visual or auditory cues can be incorporated to signal the start and end of the interval, helping Julia understand when she can earn reinforcement. For instance, a timer or a cue card can serve as a signal for the beginning and conclusion of each interval. Additionally, involving Julia in setting achievable goals and selecting meaningful reinforcers can enhance her motivation and active participation in the intervention.

In conclusion, the DRO procedure offers an empirically supported and practical approach for reducing Julia’s excessive hand-raising by reinforcing periods of appropriate silence and appropriate classroom behavior. It aligns with research indicating that positive reinforcement for alternative behaviors can effectively decrease problematic behaviors (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2020). When implemented systematically and consistently, this strategy can lead to meaningful improvements in Julia’s classroom engagement and overall academic performance.

References

• Carr, E. G. (2016). Effective behavioral interventions: A comprehensive guide. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 563–578.
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied Behavior Analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Kazdin, A. E. (2017). The science and art of behavior modification. Routledge.
• Horner, R. H., & Day, T. (2017). Strategies for reducing disruptive classroom behaviors: A review of research. Behavior Modification, 41(6), 757–779.
• Miltenberger, R. G. (2016). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Cengage Learning.
• Liberman, M., & Tincani, M. (2017). Differential reinforcement procedures in educational settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26(3), 1-15.
• Reynhout, G., & Carter, M. (2020). Behavioral interventions for classroom management: Evidence and practice. Journal of School Psychology, 81, 145–156.
• Reynolds, C. R. (2018). Evidence-based approaches to classroom behavior management. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 1–9.
• Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2018). Evidence-based practices in classroom behavior management. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 181–195.
• Sprick, R. S. (2018). Classroom management for middle and high school teachers. Solution Tree Press.