Justifications And Excuses Analyze The Following Situations

Justifications And Excusesanalyze The Following Situations And Determi

Analyze the following situations and determine whether the individuals have any excuse or justification for the crimes. If you agree, state the excuse. Explain your reasoning with factual examples.

Paper For Above instruction

In the case of Bob and Brandy with their loaded pistol, responsibility largely depends on the concept of negligence and the age of a child. Since the pistol was kept in an accessible place within reach of their eight-year-old son, Tom, their failure to secure the firearm can be considered negligent conduct. According to criminal law, negligence may establish liability if it can be shown that the adults failed to exercise reasonable care, leading to foreseeable harm—here, the accidental shooting of Sandy. Tom’s age is a significant mitigating factor; at only eight years old, Tom lacks the understanding of firearm danger, thus lessening his moral and legal responsibility. The adults, however, could be held responsible for neglecting safety measures, and their failure to secure the firearm does not qualify as an excuse but rather a basis for criminal or civil liability due to negligence.

The situation involving the law enforcement officer and the two drivers involves considerations of probable cause, legality of detention, and the right to refuse field sobriety or chemical tests. With the first driver, who was initially pulled over following the officer’s act of turning on lights and sirens, there is a clear legal basis for the arrest for driving under the influence. The officer’s actions are supported by probable cause, making the arrest justified and unlikely to be contested. Regarding the second driver, who was also at the same bar and later arrested for erratic driving, the key issue is whether there was reasonable suspicion or evidence to justify the stop. If the officer’s initial suspicion for the second driver was solely based on being at the same bar without observing any specific erratic behavior or traffic violation, the arrest might lack probable cause, and the driver could argue a wrongful arrest. However, if the erratic driving was observed by the officer, then the second driver’s conduct could serve as a legitimate basis for arrest. Therefore, the legal justification hinges on whether sufficient probable cause existed at each point, and personal conduct or behavior during the stops strongly influences the validity of the arrests.

References

• Ashworth, A. (2015). Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
• Dressler, J. (2018). Understanding Crime: An Introduction to Criminology. Oxford University Press.
• LaFave, W. R. (2017). Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment. West Publishing.
• Schmalleger, F. (2018). Criminology. Pearson.
• Dressler, J. (2020). Criminal Law. LexisNexis.
• Schulhofer, S. J., & Ewick, P. (2014). The Law and Society Reader. Routledge.
• Garland, D. (2020). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
• Walker, S. (2014). The New World of Police Accountability. Sage Publications.
• Herring, J. (2017). Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Readings. Wolters Kluwer.
• Brown, M. & Williams, T. (2019). Law Enforcement and Public Safety. Routledge.