JWI 510 Leadership In The 21st Century Lecture Notes

Jwi 510 Leadership In The 21st Century Lecture Notes Strayer Univer

This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. The assignment involves exploring the practical steps for successfully transitioning into a leadership role, particularly during the first 90 days, by understanding different business situations such as startups, turnarounds, realignments, and sostaining organizations. It emphasizes decision-making regarding focus (learning vs. action), pursuit of new initiatives vs. defending current positions, and early wins tailored to each situation. The assignment encourages reflection on establishing early wins, addressing transition traps when moving between leadership roles, and embracing challenging leadership experiences, or 'crucibles.'

Paper For Above instruction

Effective leadership transition is pivotal, especially in the critical initial three months when a new leader faces the challenge of establishing credibility, understanding organizational dynamics, and setting a strategic direction. The success of a leadership transition often determines the future trajectory of the organization and the leader's career. The process involves assessing the business situation—whether it is a startup, turnaround, realignment, or sustaining phase—and tailoring strategies accordingly. Each scenario requires a nuanced approach emphasizing specific focus areas, decision-making priorities, and early wins that establish momentum.

In startups and turnaround situations, the emphasis is on immediate action. Leaders in these contexts must make swift decisions based on incomplete information, focusing on tactical elements and quick wins to build confidence and demonstrate capability. For startups, initiating new projects, establishing core processes, and forming a capable team are crucial early steps that signal progress. Conversely, turnarounds require identifying and reinforcing the organization’s core strengths while addressing vulnerabilities rapidly. The urgency in these situations necessitates a courageous approach, with leaders making difficult decisions early to stabilize or launch the organization.

Realignment and sustaining organizations present a different set of challenges. In realignments, the leader’s role involves diagnosing what aspects of the organization should be preserved because they are working well, and what changes are needed to push the organization forward. Building urgency and gaining buy-in from employees resistant to change are essential early wins in this scenario. In sustaining organizations, the leader's focus shifts to reinforcing existing strengths and sustaining success. Early wins here involve demonstrating understanding of the organization's key drivers of success and aligning efforts with established practices to ensure stability.

Decision-making in the initial phase involves two fundamental choices. First, whether to prioritize learning or action. Startups and turnarounds lean heavily toward action, often requiring quick decision-making without the luxury of extensive analysis. Second, leaders must decide whether to focus on pursuing new initiatives or defending the current position. This depends on the business situation, with startups actively pursuing innovation, turnarounds protecting core strengths, realignments balancing new initiatives with defending existing assets, and sustainings reinforcing current stability.

Early wins serve as tangible indicators of progress and credibility. For startups, securing initial team formation and strategic clarity are vital early wins. In turnarounds, achieving operational stability or revenue milestones signals effective leadership. Realignment efforts benefit from generating urgency and employee buy-in, which can be demonstrated through successful change initiatives. In sustaining organizations, early wins encompass validating the leader's understanding of what makes the organization successful, reaffirming stability, and building confidence among team members.

The transition process also involves ten key opportunities or focus areas. These include promoting oneself confidently, accelerating learning, diagnosing the situation, securing early wins, building strong relationships with superiors, aligning strategy and organizational systems, assembling and developing effective teams, building alliances and networks, and supporting others through organizational changes. These elements are interconnected and contribute to establishing a leadership foundation that promotes trust, clarity, and strategic alignment throughout the transition.

For new leaders, emphasizing early wins can establish credibility quickly, such as implementing simple yet impactful initiatives or resolving lingering issues. Veteran leaders must recognize transition traps—such as over-relying on past success stories or resisting necessary change—and actively address them. Additionally, embracing 'crucibles'—challenging but transformative experiences—can deepen leadership maturity and resilience. Each stage of leadership transition offers lessons that develop skills, foster adaptability, and enhance strategic insight, ultimately guiding organizations through change successfully.

References

• Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Harvard Business Review, 65(4), 123-132.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. HarperBusiness.
• Ackerman, C., & Malka, S. (2016). Leadership transitions and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2), 171-184.
• Bennis, W. (2009). On becoming a leader. Basic Books.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass.
• Furnham, A. (2012). Leadership and management in organizations. Routledge.
• Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don't. HarperBusiness.
• Shields, D. (2017). Leading organizational change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 150-165.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.