JWI 550 Operations Management Course Project Part A V 491940
Jwi 550 Operations Managementcourse Project Part Avalue Stream Mappin
Use your work from Part A of the Project to identify improvement opportunities in the value stream that are suitable for Kaizen events or Work-Outs. 1) List the potential Kaizen events, select the one to be deployed and justify your selection. Then, define the Kaizen objective and scope for the selected event. 2) Develop a detailed agenda for each Kaizen event. Use a tabular format, showing: Day and times, Session topics, Lean tools to be used, Deliverables or outputs, Rationale. Explain your choice for number of days, sequence for session topics, and justify the Lean tools to be used and outputs from each session. Show how your Kaizen agenda supports the Kaizen objective and scope for each event. This discussion should be specific to your value stream and organization.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of customer interaction with a bank teller, as illustrated through the value stream mapping, offers numerous opportunities for continuous improvement leveraging Kaizen events. Based on the analysis, the most suitable improvement initiative is a Kaizen event targeting the reduction of delay times caused by the verification process, which is currently a bottleneck in serving customers efficiently. The primary objective of this Kaizen event is to streamline the verification process to enhance customer service speed, reduce customer wait times, and increase teller productivity.
One potential Kaizen event identified is a focused Rapid Improvement Workshop aimed at the verification process—specifically, the conduct verification and ask for verification documentation steps. Selecting this event stems from the recognition that delays in verification constitute a significant part of the process lead time and directly impact overall efficiency. By addressing this bottleneck, the bank can significantly improve its throughput and customer satisfaction. The scope of the event includes analyzing current verification procedures, identifying wastes, and implementing standardized or more efficient methods to reduce time variability and eliminate unnecessary steps.
The rationale for choosing a single focused Kaizen event over multiple smaller events is based on the value stream analysis which suggests that process delays are localized and manageable through targeted process redesign. Lessons from Lean thinking emphasize that focused, well-structured Kaizen events can yield quick, measurable improvements without disrupting the entire operation. Furthermore, addressing the verification delays can have a domino effect, positively influencing downstream steps such as informing the customer of the issue and thanking them at the end, thus improving overall process flow and customer experience.
The detailed agenda for this Kaizen event spans two days to allow sufficient time for comprehensive analysis, brainstorming, root cause identification, and solution implementation, ensuring sustainable change. The first day emphasizes understanding current verification practices, mapping waste, and brainstorming potential lean tools such as value stream analysis, root cause analysis, and 5S to organize the workspace effectively. The second day focuses on testing new procedures, establishing standardized work, and preparing for implementation and follow-up.
| Day and Time | Session Topic / Objective | Lean Tools to Be Used | Output / Deliverables | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1, 9:00 - 10:30 AM | Current State Analysis and Waste Identification | Value Stream Mapping, Root Cause Analysis | Current process map, list of wastes and delays | This session provides a clear understanding of existing process inefficiencies and waste points, forming the basis for targeted improvement. |
| Day 1, 10:45 - 12:00 PM | Identifying Improvement Opportunities and Brainstorming Solutions | 5S, Fishbone Diagram, Brainstorming | List of potential improvements and solution ideas | Engages team to identify quick wins and process standardization opportunities that can reduce verification time. |
| Day 2, 9:00 - 10:30 AM | Testing and Implementing Solutions | Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA), Standardized Work | New standard procedures, implementation plan | To ensure changes are tested properly and sustainable, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. |
| Day 2, 10:45 - 12:00 PM | Review and Follow-up Planning | Control Charts, Checklists | Follow-up schedule, monitoring tools | Facilitates ongoing measurement of process improvements to sustain gains and identify further opportunities. |
The selection of a two-day agenda aligns with best practices in Lean management, providing enough time for thorough analysis without causing process disruption. The sequence begins with understanding the current state, moving through root causes and waste identification, then onto solution testing and standardization, and finally establishing follow-up mechanisms. The use of Lean tools such as value stream mapping, 5S, PDCA, and control charts specifically supports the goal of optimizing verification times and ensuring sustainable improvements. This tailored approach ensures that the Kaizen event directly addresses the identified bottleneck and aligns with the overall objective of improving customer service efficiency within the bank’s operational framework.
References
- Rother, M., & Shook, J. (2003). Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA. Lean Enterprise Institute.
- Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.
- Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster.
- Spear, S., & Bowen, H. K. (1999). Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 96-106.
- Tupa, J. (2014). Performance measurement for efficient lean management: theory and case study. International Journal of Lean Enterprise Research, 1(2), 116-127.
- George, M. L. (2002). Lean Six Sigma: Combining Six Sigma Quality with Lean Production Speed. McGraw-Hill.
- Hirano, H. (1995). 5 Pillars of the Visual Workplace: The Sourcebook for Visual Thinking. Productivity Press.
- Shingo, S. (1986). A Study of the Toyota Production System: From an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint. Toyota Central R&D Labs.
- Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press.
- Lighter, D. E. (2013). The Lean Dairy: Why Lean Thinking is Essential to the Future of Sustainability and the Dairy Industry. Dairy & Food Industry, 79(7), 22-26.