King Charles Submission Date Nov 7, 2017, 9:56 Am
Kingwa4by Charles Kingsubmission Dat E 07 No V 2017 0956am U
Kingwa4by Charles Kingsubmission Dat E 07 No V 2017 0956am U
KINGWA#4 by Charles King Submission dat e : 07 - No v- :56AM (UT C- 0500) Submission ID: File name : KINGWA_4 .do c (37 .5K) Word count : 1062 Charact e r count : % SIMILARIT Y INDEX 12% INT E RNET SOURCES 19% PUBLICAT IONS 29% ST UDENT PAPERS 1 9% 2 4% 3 4% 4 3% 5 3% 6 2% 7 2% 8 2% KINGWA#4 ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES Submitted to London School of Economics and Political Science St udent Paper Submitted to University of Florida St udent Paper Int ernet Source Fearon, James D.. "Counterf actuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science", World Politics, 1991. Publicat ion Submitted to University of Birmingham St udent Paper Submitted to University of Malaya St udent Paper Submitted to The University of Buckingham St udent Paper krex.k-state.edu Int ernet Source 9 1% 10 1% 11 1% 12 1% Exclude quo tes On Exclude biblio graphy On Exclude matches Of f Submitted to Southern New Hampshire University - Distance Education St udent Paper Submitted to RMIT University St udent Paper Submitted to University of Bristol St udent Paper Submitted to Napier University St udent Paper KINGWA#4 by Charles King KINGWA#4 ORIGINALITY REPORT PRIMARY SOURCES
Paper For Above instruction
In evaluating the authenticity and originality of academic work, it is essential to analyze the sources and the extent of originality reported within a submission. The provided document exhibits a similarity index of 12%, with internet sources accounting for 19%, publications for 29%, and student papers for 19%. Such figures suggest that the work incorporates a mixture of original content and sourced material, necessitating a thorough review of the sources used and the paraphrasing techniques employed to avoid plagiarism.
Key sources identified include works submitted to reputable institutions such as the London School of Economics, University of Florida, University of Birmingham, and others, emphasizing the importance of academic integrity. The significant source appears to be a 1991 article by James D. Fearon titled "Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science," published in World Politics. Incorporating seminal works like Fearon’s, which discusses methodological approaches relevant to political science, underscores the importance of diversifying references and critically engaging with core literature to enhance the originality of academic writing.
Academic dishonesty, including improper paraphrasing or excessive reliance on external sources, can undermine the credibility of research. Therefore, it is vital to cite sources accurately, incorporate critical analysis, and develop an original argument. Proper integration of references such as Fearon’s work into the discussion can provide theoretical foundations for research hypotheses or methodological frameworks.
To uphold academic integrity, students should utilize a combination of direct quotations, paraphrasing, and synthesis of literature, ensuring each source is appropriately acknowledged. Employing citation styles such as APA or Chicago consistently demonstrates scholarly rigor and respect for intellectual property. In this context, the relative low similarity index of 12% suggests the work is predominantly original but still warrants careful review for potential unintentional overlaps or paraphrasing issues.
In conclusion, maintaining transparency about source origins and striving for genuine originality are pivotal in scholarly work. Utilizing diverse sources, engaging critically with literature, and adhering to citation standards are best practices that reinforce the integrity and scholarly value of academic submissions.