Kinship Systems Charting And Understanding
Kinship Systemscharting And Understandingkinship Systems Fromaround Th
Kinship Systems Charting and Understanding Kinship Systems from Around the World © 2019 Dr. Amy C. Kowal Types of Kinship Systems Bilateral Descent American traditional descent Unilineal Descent Patrilineal Americans traditionally observed patrilineal naming system (acquire father’s surname) Matrilineal Ambilineal Descent Individual chooses line of descent by generation Parallel Descent Men are patrilineal Women are matrilineal © 2019 Dr. Amy C. Kowal Unilineal Kinship Systems Which is patrilineal?
Matrilineal? © 2019 Dr. Amy C. Kowal Dr. Kowal’s Kinship Chart © 2019 Dr. Amy C.
Kowal Dr. Kowal’s Kinship Group Dr. Kowal is married and has 2 sons. Father is alive; Mother is deceased She has 2 brothers #1 is married and has 1 son and 1 daughter The daughter is married and has 1 daughter #2 is married to a divorcee with 1 daughter and 2 sons from previous marriage Daughter had female partner but now is divorced. They have twin sons.
1 son is married with 1 son and 1 daughter 1 son is married with 2 sons Matrilineal Kin: Dr. K, her mother, her 2 brothers, her 2 sons Patrilineal Kin: Dr. K,, her father, her 2 brothers, #1 brother and his son and daughter © 2019 Dr. Amy C. Kowal Discussion 4 Exercise – Draw your own chart answer questions above Symbols ∆ - male ๠– female â–¡ - male or female = - marriage bond l - descent bond − - codescent bond (sibling/twin) ≠- divorced X - dead ï® or â— - ego … - fictive kin (one method to use) Draw 3 generations minimum If you are matrilineal, who would be in your kinship group?
Circle all of your matrilineal relatives. Draw a square around your patrilineal relatives. Who is in a bilateral kinship group? Tip: use pencil, turn paper to horizontal © 2019 Dr. Amy C. Kowal Signature Assignment (Psychopharmacology Treatment Algorithm ) Using your learning experience from your clinical experience, preceptor input and evidence-based literature, develop a pharmacology treatment Algorithm of a patient with a DSM diagnosis. You can use your readings to change and add to your work, but it must be an original and not a copy of an algorithm from someone else. This is an algorithm developed specifically for this client to demonstrate your critical thinking throughout the treatment planning. The following areas must be covered in the assignment. · Overview of your initial patient clinical assessment including: Chief compliant, medical history, psychiatric history, psychosocial, mental status examination. · Using the information from the assessment, reading materials and textbook, develop an evidence-based algorithm for four treatment stages, tailored to this individual.
The information must include interview questions needed to guide decision-making at the different stages, length of treatment in trial/initiation period, dosage titration schedule and duration of time the client should stay on the medication, factors that might influence the effectiveness of the medications, necessary labs and test, and patient education. Include pertinent side effects profiles that would warrant a change in the medication being prescribed and a brief reasoning for your decisions. Attached is the case presentation rubric. For References: Please do not use any sources from websites or .com sources, only use peer-reviewed academic and scientific journals. Also do not reuse papers from older courses, even if you are the author.
SafeAssign will mark this as plagiarism QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: THE EXTENT OF WHICH WORK MEETS THE ASSIGNED CRITERIA AND WORK REFLECTS GRADUATE LEVEL CRITICAL AND ANALYTIC THINKING 15 points Description Excellent (15-13 points) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 90% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Good (12-11 points) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 80% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Fair (10-7 points) Assignment meets most of the expectations.
One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Poor (6-0) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.