Kmart Is An American Chain Of Discount Department Stores

Kmart Is An American Chain Of Discount Department Stores It Purchased

Kmart is an American chain of discount department stores; it purchased Sears in 2005. This is the third largest discount chain after Target and Walmart. It has more than 100 years of history and at its peak operated over 1,500 stores. However, in recent times, Kmart has faced significant challenges, including filing for bankruptcy on January 22, 2002. Currently, Kmart struggles to maintain competitiveness amidst fierce retail industry rivalry and changing consumer preferences. This paper analyzes Kmart's competitive advantages in comparison with its major competitors, Target and Walmart, and evaluates how these advantages influence its market position and sustainability.

Paper For Above instruction

Kmart, as a historic discount retail chain, has long been a notable player in the American retail landscape. Founded in the early 20th century, Kmart’s growth was driven by its ability to offer affordable prices and a broad selection of merchandise. Its strategic initiatives, including innovative marketing and loyalty programs like “Shop Your Way®,” aimed to replicate and compete with the market advantages enjoyed by industry leaders such as Target and Walmart. To understand Kmart’s current competitive stance, it is essential to analyze the advantages it shares with these rivals and identify areas where it has fallen short.

One of the most prominent competitive advantages of Kmart, akin to Target and Walmart, is its focus on discount pricing. Historically, Kmart was renowned for its “Blue Light Special,” a promotional tactic that created excitement and drew customers into its stores through timed discounts announced via mobile loudspeakers. While this promotional strategy was innovative at its peak, modern Kmart has shifted towards implementing formalized loyalty programs such as “Shop Your Way®,” designed to retain customers by offering rewards and personalized deals. This approach aligns with the industry trend where customer loyalty is cultivated through reward programs, understanding consumer preferences, and personalized marketing—principles that Target and Walmart also leverage successfully (Grewal, Roggeveen, & Nordfält, 2017).

Another shared competitive advantage is the emphasis on quality merchandise. Target and Walmart have built their reputations on offering a wide array of products through proprietary brands and collaborations with celebrities and designers. Kmart equally maintains its portfolio of private labels, such as Martha Stewart and Joe Boxer, which serve to enhance its perceived value and differentiate from competitors. However, despite having these brands, Kmart has struggled with maintaining consistent quality standards and branding relevance in comparison to Target's sophisticated branding or Walmart's extensive product variety and affordability (Rosenbaum, 2016). This inconsistency has impacted customer perception and loyalty, contributing to its waning market share.

Customer loyalty remains a vital component of competitive advantage for all three chains. Target has cultivated loyalty by positioning itself as a fashionable, community-oriented retailer, appealing to the 30-40 year-old demographic looking for quality and style. Walmart’s strategy revolves around its “everyday low prices” and convenience, with stores open 24 hours in many locations, providing customers with a one-stop shopping experience at low costs. Kmart has historically relied on its “Attention Kmart Shoppers” phrase that became a cultural catchphrase, emphasizing bargains and store familiarity. Still, with store closures and reduced visibility, Kmart’s ability to sustain customer loyalty has diminished significantly. As consumer preferences shift toward online shopping and experiential retail, Kmart’s legacy advantages are less effective without sustained innovation (Kumar et al., 2019).

In terms of brand differentiation, Walmart’s brand is globally recognized for its low-cost leadership, operating on a scale that allows for economies of scale unmatched in retail. Target's reputation for style, quality, and social responsibility appeals to a different consumer segment, providing a competitive edge in the perception of value. Kmart, by contrast, has not effectively modernized its brand, which was once associated with affordable discounts but now suffers from outdated perceptions and reduced store relevance. Its attempt to compete using discounts has been insufficient to offset declining margins and declining customer traffic.

It is noteworthy that all three companies utilize various strategies to add value beyond low prices. Target, for example, innovates through store formats such as CityTarget and small format stores, offering convenience in urban settings. It also emphasizes private label grocery lines and stylish store environments. Walmart, on the other hand, emphasizes supply chain efficiency and sustainability initiatives, reducing costs and environmental impact. Kmart has attempted to revitalize itself through reorganizations and promotional campaigns, but without substantial reinvention, it continues to lag behind in differentiation and customer engagement.

In conclusion, while Kmart shares several competitive advantages with Target and Walmart—namely discount pricing, quality merchandise, and customer loyalty—the degree to which it has capitalized on these advantages has significantly diminished over time. Target’s focus on style and community engagement, and Walmart’s scale and cost leadership, have further widened the competitive gap. For Kmart to regain or sustain competitive advantages, it must innovate in its store experience, strengthen its private-label brands, and leverage technology for targeted marketing and customer engagement. The retail industry’s rapid evolution demands continuous adaptation, and Kmart’s future depends on its ability to redefine its value propositions in this dynamic environment.

References

• Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The Future of Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(2), 174-185.
• Kumar, V., Sharma, P., & Sharma, A. (2019). Impact of Customer Loyalty Programs on Customer Retention. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(4), 45-62.
• Rosenbaum, M. (2016). The Rise and Fall of Kmart. Business History Review, 90(3), 445-471.
• Target Through The Years. (2015). Smith, J. Retail Industry Journal, 22(4), 56-65.
• Our History. (2015). Sears Holding Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.searsholdings.com
• Global Responsibility Report. (2015). Walmart. Retrieved from http://www.walmart.com
• Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2014). Concepts in Strategic Management and Business Policy (14th ed.). Pearson.
• Management Paradise.com. (2015). The History of Kmart. Retrieved from http://managementparadise.com
• Star Tribune. (2013). How Target Uses Scoring Systems for Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com
• Moore, J. (2013). Target's Community Engagement Strategy. Journal of Retail & Consumer Services, 20(6), 630-636.