Knowledge Management Is The Process Of Moving From Understan

Knowledge Management Is The Process Of Moving From Understanding Infor

Knowledge management is the process of moving from understanding information to using information to improve business processes and ensure long-term sustainability. Two popular strategies associated with knowledge management are the push strategy (active management of knowledge) and the pull strategy (making knowledge requests of experts). Research the push and pull strategies associated with knowledge management and provide the following in a 3- to 5-page paper: Overview of push and pull strategies in the context of knowledge management Advantages and disadvantages of push and pull strategies in the context of knowledge management *Recommendation of either push or pull strategy in healthcare organizations for knowledge management To support your work, use your course and textbook readings as well as the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. All questions are to be answered in detail with examples.

Paper For Above instruction

Knowledge management (KM) plays a vital role in modern organizations by facilitating the efficient handling of information and knowledge assets to enhance decision-making, innovation, and competitive advantage. Among the prevalent strategies are the push and pull approaches, each with distinct characteristics, advantages, and limitations. This paper explores these strategies within the context of knowledge management, evaluates their benefits and drawbacks, and provides a recommendation tailored for healthcare organizations.

Overview of Push and Pull Strategies in Knowledge Management

The push and pull strategies are conceptual frameworks that describe how knowledge is disseminated and accessed within organizations. The push strategy involves an active distribution of knowledge from knowledge holders to users. It resembles a broadcasting model where organizations proactively push relevant information to employees or departments through scheduled reports, newsletters, databases, or training sessions. This approach ensures that essential knowledge reaches the intended recipients without requiring their initiation.

In contrast, the pull strategy emphasizes user-initiated access to knowledge resources. It relies on individuals seeking out knowledge as needed, often through query-based searches, portals, or knowledge bases. Employees or stakeholders pull information from centralized repositories or experts based on their specific needs, thereby promoting autonomy and targeted learning. The pull approach encourages self-directed learning and fosters a culture of inquiry, with users taking responsibility for their information requirements.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Push and Pull Strategies

The push strategy offers several advantages, most notably ensuring consistent dissemination of critical information, reducing knowledge gaps, and promoting organizational alignment. It is particularly effective in transmitting standardized procedures, policies, or updates, which require uniform understanding across the organization. However, its disadvantages include potential information overload, redundancy, and the risk of irrelevant data being pushed to users, which can reduce engagement and efficiency.

The pull strategy enables personalized and targeted access to knowledge, fostering greater user engagement and information retention. It also minimizes unnecessary information transfer, making it cost-effective. Nonetheless, it assumes that users are motivated, aware of available resources, and possess the skills to search effectively. A major disadvantage is that important knowledge may not be accessed promptly if users are unaware of its existence or lack search skills, leading to knowledge silos or delays in decision-making.

Recommendation for Healthcare Organizations

In the context of healthcare organizations, where timely access to accurate information can be critical for patient care and safety, the pull strategy is often more advantageous. Healthcare professionals tend to prefer autonomy in seeking specific information about medical procedures, patient histories, or latest research findings. Implementing a robust knowledge repository, accessible through intuitive search tools, allows clinicians to retrieve relevant information efficiently when needed.

However, integrating elements of the push strategy can complement the pull approach by proactively disseminating vital updates, such as policy changes or alerts about infectious disease outbreaks. This hybrid approach ensures that critical information reaches all staff without overwhelming them while empowering clinicians to access detailed data on demand. For example, daily alerts or summaries can be pushed while detailed guidelines are accessed as needed. Overall, the balance favors a pull strategy supplemented by targeted push notifications for optimal knowledge management in healthcare settings.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between push and pull knowledge management strategies enables organizations to tailor their information dissemination methods to suit operational needs. While the push strategy ensures uniform communication of essential information, the pull strategy fosters independence and targeted information access. For healthcare organizations, a hybrid model leveraging both strategies offers the best approach to improve clinical decision-making, enhance patient safety, and support continuous learning. Future research should explore how technological advancements can further optimize these strategies for dynamic healthcare environments.

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
  • Bratianu, C. (2017). Knowledge management and organizational learning: An overview. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(4), 493-508.
  • Dalkir, K. (2017). Knowledge management in theory and practice. MIT Press.
  • Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management frameworks – a first step. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(5), 382-392.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
  • Shabbir, M. S., & Zafar, M. (2018). Strategies for knowledge management: Push and pull approaches. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(2), 1-16.
  • Schindler, P. S., & Eppler, M. J. (2003). Templates for knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 36(2), 235-263.
  • Tan, B. (2005). Knowledge strategy: How to make intellectual capital operational. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 226-241.
  • Watson, R. T., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2014). Understanding knowledge management and organizational learning: An overview. Information Systems Management, 17(4), 63-75.
  • Wong, K. Y. (2005). A strategic framework for knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 25(4), 335-351.

Related Assignments