Korgensociology In Action: Message Publishing 2019 Chapter 8 ✓ Solved

Korgensociology In Action1esage Publishing 2019chapter 8 Const

What are the sociological definitions of sex, gender, intersex, and transgender? How do the four major theoretical perspectives help sociologists understand gender? How do we learn and create our gender? How does gender affect workforce experiences? How do women’s and men’s experiences in intimate relationships differ?

Paper For Above Instructions

The definitions of sex, gender, intersex, and transgender provide a foundational understanding of the sociological perspective on identity. Sex is primarily viewed as a biological construct, defined by external genitalia, chromosomes, and internal reproductive organs (West & Zimmerman, 1987). Intersex individuals, born with ambiguous or atypical physical sex characteristics, challenge the binary categorizations of male and female, highlighting that biological sex isn't a strict binary (Fausto-Sterling, 2000). In contrast, gender is understood as a social and cultural construct. It encompasses the roles, behaviors, and expectations society considers appropriate for individuals based on their perceived sex (Butler, 1990; Connell, 2009). Transgender individuals identify with a gender that differs from their assigned sex at birth, which underscores the distinction between biological sex and gender identity (Budge et al., 2013).

Understanding gender through various theoretical perspectives is crucial in sociology. The structural functionalist perspective views gender roles as complementary, with men as leaders and women as nurturers. This perspective posits that these roles contribute to societal stability. However, it is often criticized for perpetuating traditional gender norms and failing to account for the complexities of gender identity (Giddens, 2009). The conflict perspective, particularly feminist theory, diverges from this view by highlighting how power dynamics and resource distribution create gender inequalities. Feminists emphasize that societal structures favor men, resulting in systemic disadvantages for women (Tong, 2009). This perspective illustrates how gender roles are not naturally occurring but are enforced through social institutions such as the family, education, and labor markets (Acker, 1990).

Symbolic interactionism offers a micro-level analysis of gender as a socially constructed identity. According to this perspective, individuals learn gender through daily interactions, socialization processes, and cultural norms. Respected sociologist Erving Goffman suggested that gender behavior is performed based on societal expectations, hence emphasizing the need for conformity to prescribed gender roles (Goffman, 1977). Gender identity is thus shaped significantly through peer interactions, media representations, and institutional practices.

Gender socialization starts from birth, as colors, toys, and clothing signal societal expectations for boys and girls (Weree & Evans, 2022). Parents often unconsciously promote these differences through the activities they encourage their children to engage in. For instance, boys might be given trucks and action figures, while girls receive dolls and kitchen sets, establishing early pathways for gender role development (Thorne, 1993). Media also plays an essential role in reinforcing gender norms, with children’s programming and literature portraying conventional masculine and feminine traits, thereby guiding children toward culturally accepted behaviors (Coyne et al., 2016).

In educational settings, gender dynamics become more pronounced. Studies illustrate that teachers, who predominantly are female in elementary schools, may unconsciously hold biases that influence their interactions with students, often favoring males in leadership opportunities (Sadker & Sadker, 1994). This behavior reflects a larger societal issue where male dominance is often perpetuated even in educational environments, establishing a hidden curriculum for gendered behavior. Peers also exert significant pressure to conform to gender scripts, leading to punitive measures for those who deviate from societal norms, such as labeling boys who exhibit 'feminine' behaviors (Pascoe, 2007).

Moving into the workforce, gender affects experiences significantly, particularly in terms of job segregation and wage disparities. Research indicates that certain professions, such as nursing and teaching, remain female-dominated, while industries like construction and engineering are typically male-dominated (Reskin & Roos, 1990). Gender segregation contributes to the gender wage gap, where women earn approximately 80 to 83 cents for every dollar men earn for the same work (Hegewisch & Hartmann, 2014). This disparity is often exacerbated by the perception that men are more competent in various fields and the existence of discriminatory practices that favor male employees over their female counterparts (Mandel & Semyonov, 2005).

The concept of the glass ceiling illustrates the barriers women face in advancing to top positions within organizations. Studies have found that although women may enter the workforce in equal numbers, they are underrepresented in executive roles, which has significant implications for organizational success and gender equality (Cotter et al., 2001). Conversely, the glass escalator phenomenon describes how men in female-dominated occupations often receive advantages that facilitate their career advancement, showcasing another layer of gender inequality (Williams, 1992).

Intimate relationships also reflect and reinforce gender dynamics, with women often carrying a disproportionate burden of household responsibilities, even when working full-time (Bianchi et al., 2000). This unequal division of labor can create tension and dissatisfaction within relationships. Furthermore, intimate partner violence remains a significant issue, with women disproportionately affected by such violence within relationships (Tjaden & Thoennes, 2000). Understanding these experiences is crucial in addressing broader societal inequalities rooted in gender distinctions.

Historically, norms surrounding romantic relationships have evolved from strict courtship rules to today's more casual approaches. Sexual revolutions in the 20th century significantly changed societal expectations around intimacy and casual sexual encounters (Gross, 2002). However, even in modern contexts, women who engage in casual sexual relationships are often stigmatized more harshly than their male counterparts (Reed, 2005), indicating the persistent double standards present in current societal norms.

In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of gender, sex, and sexuality highlights the importance of considering multiple sociological perspectives. By recognizing the social constructions behind these concepts and examining their implications within various social spheres, we can better address the entrenched inequalities that persist within society.

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, job segregation, and the workplace.
• Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces.
• Budge, S. L., Adelson, J. L., & Howard, K. A. (2013). Anxiety and depression in transgender individuals: The roles of social support and social identity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
• Connelley, J. (2009). Masculinities. Cambridge University Press.
• Cotter, D. A., Miller, A. S., & Vanneman, R. D. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces.
• Coyne, S. M., Nelson, D. A., & Linder, J. R. (2016). The effects of children’s media on aggression: A meta-analysis. Communication Research.
• Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books.
• Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology. Polity Press.
• Gross, E. (2002). The history of sexual liberation. Monthly Review Press.
• Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2005). Gender differences in the labor market: A cross-national perspective. Social Forces.
• Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. University of California Press.
• Reed, L. (2005). The male/female double standard of promiscuity: Variation in perceptions of casual sex. Sex Roles.
• Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queuing and the gender gap in pay. In Women and work: A handbook.
• Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. Touchstone.
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. National Institute of Justice.
• Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Rutgers University Press.
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society.
• Williams, S. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in female-dominated professions. Social Problems.