Lab Instructions V00 June 20 2018 Rotational Motion 1 Object

Lab Instructions V00 June 20 2018rotational Motion1 Objectiveto Ex

Determine the rotational inertia of a turntable system with various objects attached by measuring the acceleration of a hanging mass and using the relationships between linear and angular motion, Newton’s second law for translation and rotation, and the properties of the objects involved. The experiment involves measuring the acceleration of a small mass as it descends, calculating the moment of inertia of the turntable alone, then adding objects and measuring their influence on the system’s inertia. Use experimental data and theoretical formulas to evaluate the moments of inertia, analyze errors, and draw conclusions about rotational motion principles.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding rotational inertia and its measurement is fundamental to the study of rotational dynamics. The experiment described aims to determine the moment of inertia of a turntable system, both in its initial state and when additional objects are attached. It combines theoretical derivations using Newton's laws with practical measurements, enabling a comprehensive understanding of how mass distribution affects rotational motion.

In the initial phase, the turntable system is used without any added objects to determine the base moment of inertia. Key to this process is the relationship between the linear acceleration of the hanging mass and the angular acceleration of the turntable. When the mass is released, it accelerates downward under gravity, and this acceleration can be measured directly using timing methods. The fundamental relation connecting linear and angular motion, a = αr₀, where r₀ is the radius of the axle, is crucial. The applied Newton’s second law, mg - T = ma, where T is the tension, relates the forces acting on the mass to its acceleration. Meanwhile, the torque τ caused by the tension on the turntable leads to the rotational form τ = Iα. Combining these equations yields an expression for the acceleration a in terms of the known quantities, enabling the calculation of the moment of inertia I₀.

In the experimental setup, ensuring the string remains horizontal and tangent to the axle radius is critical for accuracy; any deviation results in measurement errors. Additionally, attention must be paid to safety precautions, such as preventing the heavy turntable or disks from falling. The experiments involve measuring the descent time of the mass over a known distance to compute acceleration accurately. This process is repeated with various configurations, attaching objects like solid disks, rings, and rectangular bars, each with known or calculable theoretical moments of inertia. The mass and geometry of these objects are measured precisely to compare experimental results with theoretical expectations.

The experimental procedure involves initially measuring the turntable's moment of inertia without extra objects. This is achieved by adjusting the hanging mass to fall slowly, enabling the timing of its descent and calculation of linear acceleration. The value of I₀ is then calculated using the derived equations. Subsequently, additional objects are attached, and the process is repeated to find the combined moment of inertia I=I₀+Iadd. The added object's moment of inertia Iadd is deduced by subtracting I₀ from the total. Using known geometric formulas for different shapes, Iref can be computed and compared with the experimentally derived values to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the measurements.

Sources of error in the experiment include inaccuracies in timing measurements, misalignment of the string or pulley, non-rigid attachment, and unaccounted frictional torques. Specifically, friction within the axle and pulley can reduce the effective torque, leading to systematic underestimation of the moment of inertia. To measure the torque due to friction, one could experimentally apply a known torque and measure the resulting angular acceleration, or measure the deceleration of a rotating object when the applied torque is removed. Ensuring the string remains horizontal reduces errors related to component misalignment, which could affect the tension and torque calculations. Proper calibration and multiple trials improve the reliability of the results.

The theoretical calculations of moments of inertia are based on standard geometric formulas derived from the mass distribution of objects. For example, for a solid disk, I = (1/2)MR²; for a ring, I = MR²; and for a rectangular bar rotating about its center, I = (1/12)ML². These theoretical values serve as benchmarks for the experimental data, allowing analysis of discrepancies and improvement of experimental technique.

In conclusion, the experiment effectively demonstrates the principles of rotational inertia and the methods to measure it in practice. By carefully executing the measurement process, analyzing errors, and comparing results with theoretical values, students can deepen their understanding of rotational dynamics. Such experiments are integral to physics education, providing tangible insights into the rotational analogs of linear Newtonian laws and strengthening conceptual comprehension of how mass distribution influences rotational motion.

References

• Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2013). Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics. Brooks/Cole.
• Ormrod, J. E., & McCoach, D. B. (2014). Educational Psychology. Pearson.
• Tipler, P. A., & Mosca, G. (2008). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Hewitt, P. G. (2014). Concepts of Physics. Pearson Education.
• Knight, R. D. (2013). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Pearson.
• Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2014). Fundamentals of Physics. Wiley.
• Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2012). University Physics. Addison Wesley.
• Fowles, G. R., & Cassiday, G. L. (2005). Analytical Mechanics. Thomson Brooks/Cole.
• Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2011). Matter and Interactions. Wiley.
• Reif, F. (2008). Fundamentals of Physics. W. H. Freeman.