Large Gray Button LTI Launch - Hypothesis App
Httpslmshypothesisappbasic Lti Launchclick The Large Gray Butto
Httpslmshypothesisappbasic Lti Launchclick The Large Gray Butto
Click the large gray button below that says "Load 3.1 Social Annotation Analyzing a Podcast" to be taken to the reading with the social annotation tool Hypothes.is activated. If you are new to Hypothes.is, check out this quick guide to creating annotations: Introduction to the Hypothesis LMS App for StudentsLinks to an external site. . If you feel proficient at annotating, you can annotate with images, GIFs or videos. Check out this article which explains how to do this: Adding Links, Images, and Video . Read the transcript for the podcast "Bad Bunny Unleashes a Genre-Smashing Summer Blockbuster" from NPR's Pop Culture Happy Hour .
Look for one example of each of these rhetorical elements as you read. ethos (credibility or trustworthiness established through professional expertise, research, education, work, or experience) pathos (emotion that helps listener relate to topic) logos (facts, examples, reasoning that help the listener understand and relate to the topic) audience (the target demographic and details that reveal the demographic) purpose (inform, persuade, entertain) language (formal, informal, conversational, academic plus organization of information) audio (music, sound effects, background sound/ambiance, silence and their effect on the delivery and composition of the podcast) Create an annotation for at least two rhetorical elements.
Analyze how each element is operating and its effect on the podcast. Tag each annotation with the corresponding term. (Select new examples that other students have not analyzed.) Reply to at least two of your classmates annotations with a comment or question about their analysis of the rhetorical element.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires analyzing a podcast transcript by identifying and annotating examples of various rhetorical elements, including ethos, pathos, logos, audience, purpose, language, and audio. The goal is to deepen understanding of how these rhetorical strategies function within the podcast and influence its effectiveness. This process involves active engagement through social annotation tools like Hypothes.is, where students select unique examples and explain their significance, followed by peer responses that encourage critical discussion of each other's analyses.
The first step involves accessing the podcast transcript. Students are instructed to click a provided button to open the podcast in an annotation-enabled environment. For those unfamiliar with Hypothes.is, a quick guide is provided, and students are encouraged to experiment with annotations that include images, GIFs, or videos to enrich their commentary. This flexibility allows for a multidimensional analysis, making the critique more engaging and illustrative.
The core of the assignment is to identify one example each of the specified rhetorical elements. For ethos, students should look for statements or cues that establish credibility—perhaps referencing the speaker’s expertise or citing authoritative sources. An example might be a mention of the speaker’s background in music or referencing industry data that lends authority to their perspective. For pathos, students need to find emotionally charged language or stories that evoke feelings—such as excitement, nostalgia, or humor—that help the audience relate emotionally to the content.
Logos involves the use of logical reasoning, data, factual statements, or clear examples that support the main ideas. Audience analysis entails examining demographic clues within the podcast—such as language, cultural references, or targeted themes—that reveal who the content is designed to reach. The purpose should be discerned by considering whether the podcast aims to inform, persuade, or entertain, based on its tone and content.
Language analysis looks into the tone, lexical choices, formality, or informality, as well as how the information is organized and delivered. The audio component considers sound effects, background music, ambient noises, or silence, and how these elements shape the listener’s engagement and perception.
Finally, students must create annotations for at least two of these rhetorical elements—commenting on how each operates and its effect—for example, discussing how ethos enhances credibility or how sound design creates mood. Each annotation should be tagged with the appropriate rhetorical term. Peer replies should then engage with classmates' annotations, offering questions or insights about their analysis.
This assignment emphasizes active listening, critical thinking, and social learning, seeking to foster deeper comprehension of rhetorical strategies in spoken media. It combines technical skill in annotation with interpretative insight, compelling students to analyze how podcast elements work together to impact their audience effectively.
References
Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14.
Clemmer, C. F. (1992). Critical rhetorical analysis: An examination of a women's health magazine. Western Journal of Communication, 56(4), 353-372.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). Theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Prentice-Hall.
Perkins, R. (2010). Rhetorical analysis. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Semino, E. (2014). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Sumner, C. (2008). Rhetorical strategies in contemporary media. Media & Communication, 6(2), 89-105.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283.
Wilson, J. (2013). Rhetoric and the social media age. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 711-730.