Larsen Company Manufactures Car Seats In San Antonio Place

Larsen Company Manufactures Car Seats In Its San Antonio Plant Each C

Larsen Company Manufactures Car Seats In Its San Antonio Plant Each C

Analyze the process-costing system of Larsen Company for its assembly department, focusing on the calculation of equivalent units using the weighted-average method, summarizing costs, and assigning them appropriately to units transferred out and ending work in process for October 2017. Address issues related to the calculation and review of equivalent units, and perform detailed cost computations including cost per equivalent unit.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Manufacturing environments that produce large quantities of similar products often utilize process costing systems to accumulate production costs efficiently. Larsen Company's manufacturing of car seats in its San Antonio plant exemplifies such a system, involving sequential processes of assembly and testing. This paper explores the application of process costing, specifically the weighted-average method, to accurately allocate costs across units at different stages of production, focusing on the assembly department's October 2017 data.

Calculation of Equivalent Units

In process costing, the calculation of equivalent units is essential for allocating costs between completed and in-process units. Since Larsen Company adds direct materials at the beginning of the process and incurs conversion costs evenly throughout, the calculation hinges on the physical units involved during October. The physical units include units started during the period, units completed and transferred out, and ending Work in Process (WIP). The physical units are carried over from the data provided, which typically enumerates units in beginning inventory, units started, units completed, and units in ending inventory.

For direct materials, since they are added at the start, the equivalent units are equal to the physical units for units in ending WIP, because all direct materials are assumed to be added at the beginning of the process. Conversely, for conversion costs, which are incurred uniformly, the equivalent units are calculated as the units completed plus the equivalent units in ending WIP, determined based on the percentage of completion for conversion costs.

Review of Equivalent Units Calculation Issues

The review process should focus on potential discrepancies arising from assumptions about cost behavior and the timing of costs. Key issues include: ensuring that the added costs are accurately matched with the stage of completion, validating the percentages of completion for ending WIP, and confirming that the physical units data is complete and accurate. Misestimations in the percentage of completion for WIP or errors in physical unit counts can lead to distorted cost per unit calculations, impacting profitability analysis and pricing decisions.

Summary of Total Costs and Cost per Equivalent Unit

Next, the total costs for each cost category—direct materials and conversion costs—must be summarized. These costs include all expenses incurred during October, aggregated from beginning inventory costs and costs added during the period. The cost per equivalent unit is then calculated by dividing the total costs by the equivalent units for each category, providing the basis for assigning costs to units transferred out and to ending WIP.

Allocation of Costs

Using the weighted-average method, costs are allocated by combining beginning inventory costs with current period costs to produce a blended cost per unit. Units completed and transferred out are assigned the full cost per equivalent unit, while ending WIP units are assigned a proportion of the costs based on their percentage of completion. This allocation ensures an accurate reflection of production costs in the period, which is crucial for financial reporting and managerial decision-making.

Conclusion

In process costing, particularly under the weighted-average method, the accuracy of equivalent units calculations significantly influences total cost attribution and profitability assessment. Larsen Company must ensure meticulous physical unit counts and precise estimation of the percentage of completion for WIP to avoid miscosting. The thorough analysis of costs and units in the assembly department provides valuable insights into operational efficiency and cost control, guiding strategic management decisions.

References

  • Cole, R. E., & Schutz, A. (2019). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. Cengage Learning.
  • Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. (2020). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
  • Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2018). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2020). Managerial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making. Wiley.
  • Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. (2016). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Blocher, E., Stout, D., Juras, P., & Cokins, G. (2019). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (2018). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Anthony, R., & Govindarajan, V. (2018). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Zimmerman, J. L. (2020). Accounting for Decision Making and Control. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments