Laureate Education Inc Page 1 Of 2 Final Project Scenarios L

2016 Laureate Education Inc Page 1 Of 2final Project Scenarioslon

Evaluate the strategic and technological challenges and opportunities faced by Bethany Place, Bedford Hospital, and Canon Hospital in their respective healthcare settings. Your analysis should include assessments of current strategies, external environment factors, internal resources, and capabilities, and propose viable strategic alternatives and specific recommendations to address their critical issues, with a focus on IT infrastructure, electronic health record implementations, telemedicine programs, and future technological planning. Support your analysis with credible industry data, financial comparisons, and scholarly references, and structure your report with clear sections including an executive summary, introduction, external environment analysis, internal analysis, major strategic issue, strategic alternatives, and targeted recommendations.

Paper For Above instruction

The rapidly evolving healthcare landscape necessitates that hospitals and healthcare facilities adopt innovative strategies and cutting-edge technologies to enhance patient care, improve operational efficiency, and remain competitive. This report analyzes three distinct case scenarios—Bethany Place, Bedford Hospital, and Canon Hospital—each confronting unique strategic and technological challenges that require tailored solutions grounded in thorough strategic analysis and technological assessment.

Introduction

Healthcare providers operate within a complex environment wherein strategic alignment and technological infrastructure significantly influence service quality, cost management, and patient satisfaction. Bethany Place, a long-term care facility, seeks to integrate electronic medical records (EMRs) into its operations to address quality and risk management issues, especially concerning medication reconciliation during patient transfer. Bedford Hospital, having recently divested from an academic health center, faces the critical task of selecting and implementing an appropriate IT infrastructure beyond its current Cerner platform, which will expire in two years. Canon Hospital, a rural facility, aims to establish telemedicine capabilities to manage ICU and stroke patients more effectively, reducing patient transfers and enhancing community-based care.

This report evaluates each organization’s strategic positioning, external environment, and internal resources to identify critical issues. Based on this analysis, it proposes strategic alternatives and concludes with actionable recommendations aligned with their organizational objectives and technological needs.

Analysis of External Environment

Examining the external environment using frameworks such as PESTEL and Porter’s Five Forces reveals critical insights. For Bethany Place, regulatory changes and increasing emphasis on electronic health records driven by federal incentives and quality metrics constitute key trends. The healthcare industry’s shift towards digital integration presents opportunities for enhanced care coordination but also threats related to cybersecurity risks and compliance costs.

Bedford Hospital’s industry environment is characterized by intense competition in the regional market, high capital investments in IT infrastructure, and the imminent expiration of its Cerner enterprise agreement. Industry attractiveness remains moderate due to consolidations and technological standardization, but threats include potential vendor lock-in and the financial burden of new system purchases. Opportunities lie in leveraging emerging health IT innovations and forming strategic partnerships to improve service delivery.

Canon Hospital, geographically isolated, faces external pressures from demand for specialized care and shortage of specialized providers. The advent of telemedicine presents a significant opportunity to extend specialty services locally, reducing patient transfers to tertiary centers. The threat, however, involves regulatory and reimbursement challenges, as well as technological infrastructure limitations in rural areas, which could hinder effective program implementation.

Internal Analysis

Evaluating internal resources across each organization highlights key strengths and weaknesses. Bethany Place’s absence of an EMR system is a critical weakness, leading to quality issues and increased risk during patient transfers. Its recent IT network improvements serve as a foundation for adopting comprehensive electronic health management solutions. The most valuable resource here is the dedicated staff and management team committed to quality care, which can be harnessed during EMR implementation.

Bedford Hospital’s main strength is its existing Cerner platform, offering a comprehensive clinical and operational suite that supports inpatient documentation, orders, and decision support. Its weakness lies in the impending system expiration and the reliance on outdated infrastructure that requires strategic renewal. Financial stability from prior integration with an academic health system is a notable advantage, but future costs and vendor dependence pose risks.

Canon Hospital’s core resource is its rural location and community trust, providing a stable patient base that can benefit from telemedicine. Its weakness involves infrastructural deficiencies, such as limited broadband connectivity and technological expertise, which may impede telehealth deployment. However, its strategic position allows it to pioneer tele-stroke and ICU management programs specific to rural healthcare needs.

Major Strategic Issue

For Bethany Place, the critical issue centers on implementing an effective EMR system that integrates seamlessly with existing processes, enhances care quality, and addresses patient safety concerns, particularly medication reconciliation. For Bedford Hospital, the pressing challenge is selecting and migrating to a sustainable, cost-effective IT platform post-Cerner, ensuring minimal disruption and future scalability. Canon Hospital’s primary issue involves establishing reliable telemedicine services to improve specialty care delivery, reduce patient transfers, and enhance community health outcomes.

These issues are each characterized by an urgent need for strategic IT investments that align with long-term organizational goals while overcoming specific internal limitations and external threats.

Available Alternative Strategies

Within Bethany Place, two viable options include: (1) adopting a comprehensive EMR solution through a leading provider—beneficial for standardization but costly and potentially disruptive; or (2) staged implementation of modular EMR components, which allows gradual transition but may create integration challenges. Critically, both options require strong change management and staff training.

At Bedford Hospital, alternatives involve: (1) negotiating a new enterprise agreement to acquire a modern, scalable system aligned with long-term strategic needs; or (2) exploring cloud-based or hybrid solutions that offer flexibility and cost savings. Each alternative involves considerations of vendor lock-in, data security, and implementation complexity.

For Canon Hospital, strategies include: (1) partnering with certified telemedicine providers to develop specialized ICU and stroke telehealth programs; or (2) investing incrementally in rural broadband infrastructure and telehealth hardware, enabling phased deployment. The latter focuses on sustainability and local capacity building but may delay immediate benefits.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis, the following recommendations are proposed:

Corporate Strategy Recommendations

  • Bethany Place should prioritize selecting an established EMR vendor with proven interoperability to enable seamless patient data exchange and support quality improvement initiatives. This aligns with its strategic goal of enhancing care quality and safety.
  • Bedford Hospital must develop a comprehensive IT transition strategy, including negotiations for a new scalable health IT system, considering cloud options to reduce infrastructure costs and improve flexibility.
  • Canon Hospital should establish strategic partnerships with tertiary centers specializing in stroke and critical care to develop telemedicine programs, supported by infrastructure investments tailored to rural contexts.

Competitive Strategy Recommendations

  • Bethany Place’s competitive advantage hinges on adopting integrated EMR solutions that improve patient safety and operational efficiency, differentiating it in long-term care services.
  • Bedford Hospital’s strategic focus should be on leveraging its current Cerner platform while planning for an upgrade that ensures clinical and operational continuity, positioning itself competitively post-expiration.
  • Canon Hospital’s telemedicine initiatives should be targeted to develop niche services that improve local access to tertiary care, thereby building community loyalty and reducing external referrals.

Implementation and Final Remarks

Successful implementation of these strategies requires diligent change management, staff training, and stakeholder engagement. Bethany Place must carefully plan EMR deployment to minimize disruption, leveraging its staff’s expertise. Bedford Hospital should evaluate vendors based on scalability and support services, ensuring smooth transition from Cerner. Canon Hospital’s telehealth projects need infrastructural upgrades and robust telemedicine infrastructure, alongside regulatory compliance.

Overall, a strategic, phased approach integrated with technological advancements will position these facilities to meet future challenges effectively, improve patient outcomes, and sustain competitive advantage within their respective markets.

References

  • Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act Drove Large Gains In Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416-1422.
  • Buntin, M. B., Burke, M. F., Hoaglin, M. C., & Blumenthal, D. (2011). The Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of the Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results. Health Affairs, 30(3), 464-471.
  • Barnett, M. L., & Landon, B. E. (2018). The Evidence on Telemedicine and Its Limitations. JAMA, 319(2), 127-128.
  • Farrell, D., & Grant, R. (2019). Healthcare’s Digital Transformation. McKinsey & Company.
  • Peterson, K., et al. (2019). Strategies for Effective Health IT Planning in Rural Hospitals. Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(5), 332-342.
  • Porche, M., & Nather, P. (2018). The Future of Telemedicine in Rural Healthcare. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(7), 523-529.
  • Rajkomar, A., et al. (2019). Scalable and Accurate Deep Learning with Electronic Health Records. npj Digital Medicine, 2, 1-10.
  • Shortliffe, E. H., & Cimino, J. J. (2014). Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Springer.
  • Sullivan, K. M., et al. (2020). Evaluating Telehealth Implementation in Rural Settings. Rural and Remote Health, 20(4), 608-617.
  • West, D. M. (2019). The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Brookings Institution Press.

Related Assignments