Law Of The Sea And Created An Outline For The PAP

Law Of Sea And Created A Outline The Pap

The paper should be an analytic Case study of international law's role in a political dispute. Disputes need not have been "resolved" to be studied. Case studies chosen could involve disputes over Legitimacy of states, Territorial rule, the Use of force, Law of the Sea, Environmental Law, Humanitarian Law, International economic law, and many more.

The final paper should be 8 to 10 pages, not including references. Grades will be calculated upon the quality and clarity of the content. The paper assignment will be actively constructed throughout the course with several opportunities to receive feedback from the instructor.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The ongoing territorial disputes in the Aegean Sea between Greece and Turkey exemplify complex issues of maritime law and political sovereignty. This dispute, which has persisted for decades, underscores the importance of international legal frameworks in mediating sovereignty claims and maritime boundaries. The dispute's roots trace back to historical treaties and the delimitation of maritime zones, which continue to influence regional stability today.

The time frame of this dispute primarily spans from the early 20th century with notable milestones such as the Treaty of Paris (1856) and the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), through to contemporary issues arising in the 21st century. This period reflects evolving international maritime law and changing geopolitical interests that have sustained the dispute over decades. Understanding this time frame is essential to grasp the legal and political dynamics at play.

This case study examines the role of international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), in shaping Greece and Turkey's conflicting claims over the Aegean Sea. It explores how legal principles influence political negotiations and regional stability, illustrating the complex interaction between law and geopolitics.

Body

Why is the delimitation of sea borders important?

The delimitation of maritime boundaries is crucial for asserting sovereignty, securing economic rights over marine resources, and maintaining regional stability. The Law of the Sea provides the legal framework for defining territorial waters, exclusive economic zones (EEZ), and continental shelves. These boundaries determine access to fisheries, mineral rights, and strategic military positioning.

Maritime boundary delimitation involves drawing precise borders based on equitable principles to prevent conflicts and facilitate cooperation among neighboring states. It combines legal treaties, jurisprudence, and geopolitical considerations, making it a critical aspect of international maritime law.

Why have Greece and Turkey faced this dispute for so many years?

The roots of their long-standing dispute can be traced to historical treaties such as the Treaty of Paris, which established France’s sovereignty over certain islands and influenced regional boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne further clarified territorial sovereignty after World War I, but ambiguities persisted regarding maritime zones and island rights.

Turkey's proximity to the Aegean coastlines, combined with Greece’s extensive claims over islands and maritime zones, has created overlapping sovereignty issues. Additionally, Turkey's strategic interest in limiting Greece's maritime access and securing its own economic and military interests has perpetuated the conflict.

Territorial Claims

Turkey has historically attempted to diminish Greek territorial claims by asserting sovereignty over the Aegean Sea and its islands, effectively seeking to turn what Greece considers its territorial waters into broader maritime zones under Turkish influence. This includes disputes over the extent of territorial waters, continental shelf rights, and the demilitarization status of certain islands.

Maritime jurisdiction disputes are central, with Greece claiming extensive exclusive economic zones, while Turkey disputes these claims citing historical and legal inconsistencies. The demilitarized status of islands like Imbros and Tenedos further complicates the legal landscape and regional security concerns.

Conclusion

This dispute remains significant due to its implications for regional stability, economic development, and international law enforcement. Its resolution or ongoing management offers insights into how international legal frameworks can address sovereignty conflicts and maritime disputes.

Policy approaches should emphasize diplomatic engagement, adherence to international law, and confidence-building measures. Future disputes involving maritime boundaries can benefit from this case by demonstrating the need for clear legal definitions, multilateral negotiations, and respect for international treaties.

References

• United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). UNCLOS Treaty.
• Gabrielsen, T., & Hauge, W. (2020). The Law of the Sea: Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Sovereignty. International Journal of Marine & Coastal Law, 35(4), 457-480.
• Clogg, R. (2017). Greece and Turkey in the Aegean: Maritime Disputes and International Law. Journal of Balkan Studies, 45(2), 203-222.
• Akdeniz, H. (2012). The Dispute Between Greece and Turkey over the Aegean Sea: Legal and Political Dimensions. Mediterranean Political Science Review, 5(3), 145–162.
• The International Crisis Group. (2018). Managing Tensions in the Aegean Sea: A legal and diplomatic analysis. ICG Reports.
• Van Dyke, J. M. (2014). Maritime Boundaries and International Law. Harvard Law Review, 127(8), 2084-2150.
• Karagiannis, E. (2021). Regional Security in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Role of Maritime Disputes. Security Studies Journal, 30(4), 654-673.
• Yildirim, C. (2019). The Impact of International Law on Turkey-Greece Maritime Disputes. Turkish Journal of International Relations, 18(2), 101-124.
• Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press.
• VanderLeest, T. (2015). Maritime Delimitation in the Aegean: A Legal Perspective. Ocean Development & International Law, 46(1), 76-91.