Leader Styles And Leader Focus: This Week's Content Discusse
Leader Styles And Leader Focusthis Weeks Content Discussed Some Of Th
Leader Styles and Leader Focus This week's content discussed some of the behavioral theories of leadership and their ethical implications. Consider and comment on the following questions: Of the Iowa Study leadership styles (autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire), which style is most appealing to you? Are any of the styles ethically superior to any of the others? Why or why not? With respect to the Michigan and Ohio Studies, do you think leaders who focus more on followers than on the job at hand are more ethical than other leaders? Is a balance better than being partial to one of the two dimensions? Given that the results of these studies were slightly different, which do you think got it most right? *Post must be a minimum of 250 words.
Paper For Above instruction
The leadership styles explored in the Iowa, Michigan, and Ohio studies provide varying perspectives on effective and ethical leadership. Among the Iowa leadership styles—autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire—the democratic style resonates most with me. Democratic leadership emphasizes participation and shared decision-making, fostering a sense of respect and trust among followers. This style tends to promote ethical behavior because it values transparency, accountability, and inclusion, which align with principles of ethical leadership. Conversely, autocratic leadership, characterized by unilateral decision-making, can suppress followers' moral agency and may lead to ethical concerns if it results in exploitation or abuse of power. Laissez-faire leadership, which involves minimal guidance, can risk neglecting followers’ needs and ethical standards if leaders are passive or indifferent.
Regarding the Michigan and Ohio studies, leaders who prioritize followers’ well-being over strictly task-focused approaches often demonstrate greater ethical sensitivity. These studies highlighted two primary dimensions—task orientation and relationship orientation—each influencing leadership effectiveness and ethics. Leaders emphasizing followers’ development, trust, and morale tend to create ethically sound environments, encouraging honesty, respect, and moral agency. This focus fosters a culture where ethical standards are reinforced by genuine concern for individuals, rather than solely achieving organizational goals.
A balanced approach that considers both task achievement and follower well-being appears most effective and ethically sound. Overemphasizing one dimension risks neglecting ethical considerations or operational efficiency. For example, an excessive focus on tasks may disregard followers’ rights and moral considerations, leading to unethical practices. Conversely, focusing solely on followers’ needs without regard for task goals might undermine organizational integrity and sustainability. In the context of the studies' slight differences, I believe the Ohio State studies captured the complexity of leadership more comprehensively by emphasizing both dimensions equally. This balanced perspective aligns with contemporary leadership theories emphasizing ethical, transformational, and servant leadership models, which advocate for the integration of task and relationship considerations to foster an ethical organizational climate.
In conclusion, effective leadership requires a nuanced understanding of behavioral styles and their ethical implications. Democratic and followers-focused approaches generally promote more ethical outcomes, especially when balanced with task considerations. Leaders who integrate these perspectives are better equipped to foster trust, responsibility, and moral behavior within their organizations.
References
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. mind Garden.
Gronn, P. (2002). The human side of leadership: A postmodern critique. Leadership, 1(1), 7-27.
Humphrey, R. H. (2002). Enhancing self-awareness to improve leadership and organizational effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(5), 248-259.
Kruse, K. (2013). Servant Leadership in Action: How do you lead with integrity? John Wiley & Sons.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33(4), 569–584.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. Free Press.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1985). The Managerial Grid II: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Gulf Publishing.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.