Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric Criteria Exemplary
Leadership Self-Assessment Grading Rubric Criteria Exemplary Proficient Competent Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory
Identify what three theories (from the Northouse text) you decided to use to evaluate yourself. Explain why you chose these three theories.
Introduction section exceeds meeting stated objectives as evidenced by: - three theories identified - explanation of why these theories were chosen (5 points)
Introduction section meets stated objectives with accurate and relevant information related to: - three theories identified - explanation of why these three theories were chosen (4 points)
Introduction section minimally meets objectives as evidenced by three theories identified, but no explanation given for selecting theories. (3 points)
Introduction section meets objectives with only one or two theories identified and explanation for choosing the selected theories. (2 points)
No introductory paragraph found in paper. (0 points)
Theory 1 Primary Concepts
Explain the primary concepts of your first selected theory.
Primary concepts of the first selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts. (5 points)
Primary concepts of the first selected theory meet stated objectives. (4 points)
Primary concepts of the first selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained. (3 points)
Primary concepts of the first selected theory do not meet objectives. (2 points)
Primary concepts of the first selected theory are not found in paper. (0 points)
Discussion of Results (Theory 1)
Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your first selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (7 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (6 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (5 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (4 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (0 points)
Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement (Theory 1)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (6 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (5 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (4 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style (3 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper. (0 points)
Theory 2 Primary Concepts
Explain the primary concepts of your second selected theory.
Primary concepts of the second selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts. (5 points)
Primary concepts of the second selected theory meet stated objectives. (4 points)
Primary concepts of the second selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained. (3 points)
Primary concepts of the second selected theory do not meet objectives. (2 points)
Primary concepts of the second selected theory are not found in paper (0 points)
Discussion of Results (Theory 2)
Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your second selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (7 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (6 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (5 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (4 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (0 points)
Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement (Theory 2)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (6 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (5 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (4 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in leadership style (3 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper. (0 points)
Theory 3 Primary Concepts
Explain the primary concepts of your third selected theory.
Primary concepts of the third selected theory exceeds objectives with clear and concise explanation and description of the primary concepts. (5 points)
Primary concepts of the third selected theory meet stated objectives. (4 points)
Primary concepts of the third selected theory minimally meet objectives. Concepts are partially defined and explained. (3 points)
Primary concepts of the third selected theory do not meet objectives. (2 points)
Primary concepts of the third selected theory are not found in paper. (0 points)
Discussion of Results (Theory 3)
Describe your results (be specific) from taking the test/questionnaire associated with your third selected theory. Share what the score interpretation reflects about your scores.
Discussion of results exceeds objectives with clear and concise description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (7 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (6 points)
Discussion of results meets objectives with minimal or absent description of: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (5 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (4 points)
Discussion of results of the following are missing from the paper: - the theory measurement tool - results of theory questionnaire - the score interpretation of your answers (0 points)
Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Improvement (Theory 3)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section exceeds stated objectives with clear and concise discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (6 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section meets stated objectives with discussion of: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (5 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section includes minimal or absent information in relation to 1 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (4 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section does not meet objectives with minimal or absent information in 2 of the 3 areas: - strengths discovered in your personal leadership style - weaknesses discovered in your personal leadership style - opportunities for personal improvement discovered in your leadership style (3 points)
Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities section not found in paper. (0 points)
Conclusion
Summarizing paragraph.
Conclusion summary exceeds objectives with clear and concise information related to leadership self- assessments. Conclusion demonstrates critical thinking. (6 points)
Conclusion summary meets objectives with accurate and relevant information related to leadership self- assessments. Conclusion demonstrates critical thinking. (5 points)
Conclusion summary meets objectives with minimal information related to leadership self- assessments. (4 points)
Conclusion summary does not meet objectives - no information related to leadership self- assessments found (3 points)
Conclusion not found in paper. (0 points)
Evidence
Minimum of three references for the paper (One reference should be the Northouse text). References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Provides four or more references, one of which is the Northouse text. All references peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. Current within 5 years. (5 points)
Provides three references one of which is the Northouse text. All references peer-reviewed, scholarly, and professional. Current within 5 years. (4 points)
Provides two references, one of which is the Northouse text. Some references are not peer-reviewed, scholarly, professional and/or current within 5 years (3 points)
Provides one reference, which is the Northouse text. And/or One reference provided and is not peer-reviewed, scholarly, professional or current within last 5 years. (2 points)
The Northouse text was not included as a reference or no references provided (0 points)
Scholarly Presentation
Key concepts of scholarly presentation include communication and professionalism. Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation of ideas with correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/maximum word requirement. *Note: Maximum points will be deducted for papers that exceed 4 pages Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level without errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/ maximum length (15 points)
Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with no more than three errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/ maximum length (13 points)
Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with no more than six errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/ maximum length (12 points)
Thoughts show minimal organization at the paragraph level with no more than nine errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Paper meets stated minimum/ maximum length (8 points)
Thoughts show no logical organization at the paragraph level. Contains more than ten errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation
APA Style APA formatting – includes cover page, headings, running head, double spaced, explanation of abbreviations given, in-text citations, and reference page. APA format used with no errors in: - cover page - headings - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list (15 points)
No more than two APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list (13 points)
No more than four APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list (12 points)
No more than six APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - references list (8 points)
Seven or more APA formatting errors noted in: - cover page - headings - double spacing - explanation of abbreviations - in-text citations - no reference list (0 points)
PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). LH:lh 08/17; 08/18; 12/18; 12/19
References
- Additional scholarly sources within 5 years relevant to leadership theories and self-assessment tools.