Leadership Theory 2 Shaimika Jones Waldorf

LEADERSHIP THEORY 2 Leadership Theory Shaimika Jones Waldorf University

For the leadership theory project, I will work with the behavioral leadership theory. According to the behavioral leadership theory, leadership is not inherent rather it is an aspect that can be learned. The behavioral theory is based on the notion that behaviors can be conditioned in relation to specific stimuli (Robbins & Judge, 2019). Such is acquired through interactions with the environment and the responses to the stimuli in the environment. There are three types of leadership styles that can fall under the behavioral leadership theory among them autocratic leadership, democratic leadership and laissez-faire leadership (Tannenbaum, 1961 ).

I think that the behavioral leadership theory can be applied to my current place of work since the leadership style can be tailored to specific situations. As a person working in construction the work environment is often characterized by rigid rules, and control is mandatory as a means of keeping people out of harm. In such a scenario, autocratic leadership would be effective where the leaders could be responsible for making all major decisions without necessarily consulting with the peers of company teams (Behrendt, Matz & Gà¶ritz, 2017). The behavioral leadership theory can be used to improve organizational behavior and increase diversity in organizations specifically through the application of the democratic leadership style.

The democratic leadership style is one where the leaders work with their employees to make decisions, this will help the employees to feel valued, to have a better ownership sense and to feel motivated hence resulting in higher productivity (Yukl et. al., 2019). In relation to application of the behavioral leadership theory there are two possible research questions that I would investigate: 1. How can the behavioral leadership theory be used to maximize on employee productivity? 2. Is the behavioral leadership style positively and significantly related to job performance?

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership theories are foundational frameworks that help us understand how effective leadership is developed and manifested within organizations. Among these, the behavioral leadership theory stands out as a pragmatic approach that emphasizes learned behaviors rather than inherent traits. This theory posits that leadership qualities are not innate but can be acquired and refined through experience, training, and environmental interactions. Understanding this perspective is particularly significant in contemporary organizational settings where adaptability and continuous improvement are valued traits.

The core premise of the behavioral leadership theory is that leadership is defined by actions and behaviors observable in leaders, which can be identified, modeled, and enhanced. Unlike trait theories that focus on inherent qualities such as charisma or intelligence, behavioral theories suggest that effective leadership can be developed through specific behavioral patterns. These patterns include decision-making styles, communication approaches, and interpersonal interactions, which collectively influence organizational outcomes. This approach simplifies leadership development because it provides clearer pathways for training and assessment, focusing on changing behaviors that can be learned and measured rather than relying on innate traits.

Within the spectrum of behavioral leadership styles, three prominent approaches emerge: autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership. Autocratic leadership emphasizes centralized decision-making where the leader retains control and authority. This style can be effective in crises or environments requiring strict compliance, such as construction sites or manufacturing plants, where safety and adherence to procedures are paramount (Behrendt, Matz & Gà¶ritz, 2017). Conversely, democratic leadership involves participative decision-making, encouraging input from team members, fostering ownership, and motivating employees. This style can promote higher engagement and job satisfaction, ultimately leading to increased productivity (Yukl, Mahsud, Prussia, & Hassan, 2019). Laissez-faire leadership represents a more hands-off approach, where leaders delegate substantial autonomy to team members, which can be effective when team members are highly skilled and autonomous.

The relevance of behavioral leadership theory in the workplace is profound, especially in dynamic environments like construction, where safety, regulation compliance, and team coordination are essential. In such settings, autocratic leadership can be beneficial during emergencies or critical phases requiring decisive action. However, integrating democratic practices can also enhance team collaboration, innovation, and morale. For instance, involving workers in decision-making about safety procedures or work processes can foster a sense of responsibility and commitment to organizational goals.

Applying the behavioral leadership theory in practical terms involves training leaders to adopt effective behaviors aligned with organizational objectives. Leadership development programs can focus on enhancing communication skills, decision-making processes, and interpersonal behaviors. For example, emphasizing participative approaches can encourage managers and supervisors to seek employee input, thereby improving organizational climate and performance. Moreover, behavioral assessment tools such as 360-degree feedback can identify existing leadership behaviors and highlight areas for improvement, facilitating targeted development efforts.

Research pertaining to the application of behavioral leadership styles reveals significant implications for organizational effectiveness. One pertinent question is how behavioral leadership can be employed to maximize employee productivity. Studies have shown that leaders who demonstrate supportive behaviors, transformational practices, and participative decision-making are more likely to foster motivation and engagement among employees (Yukl et al., 2019). These behaviors create a positive work environment, reduce turnover, and enhance overall performance. Furthermore, examining whether behavioral leadership styles are positively correlated with job performance provides insights into best practices for leadership training and organizational culture.

Empirical evidence suggests that leaders exhibiting a mix of task-oriented and relationship-oriented behaviors yield superior organizational outcomes. For instance, transformational leadership, characterized by inspiring and motivating followers, aligns closely with behavioral models and has been linked to increased employee performance (Bass & Avolio, 1995). Organizations aiming for high productivity should thus cultivate leaders capable of flexible behavioral patterns, skilled in both directive and participative styles depending on situational demands. This dynamic application of behaviors ensures resilience and adaptability in fast-changing environments like construction projects or manufacturing.

The integration of behavioral leadership theory into organizational development strategies can foster a culture of continuous learning and flexibility. Leadership training programs should emphasize behavioral competencies such as emotional intelligence, effective communication, and conflict resolution. Additionally, organizations can implement mentoring systems and peer coaching to reinforce desired leadership behaviors and create a ripple effect of positive change across teams and departments. A strategic focus on behavior modification aligns leadership practices with organizational goals, fostering higher engagement and productivity.

In conclusion, behavioral leadership theory provides a practical and adaptable framework for developing effective leaders capable of responding to diverse organizational challenges. Its emphasis on learned behaviors rather than inherent qualities makes it accessible for leadership training and development initiatives. As organizations evolve, leveraging behavioral insights can significantly enhance leadership effectiveness, employee motivation, and overall organizational performance. Future research should explore how specific behavioral interventions influence productivity and job performance across various industries, particularly in high-stakes environments such as construction and manufacturing.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
• Behrendt, P., Matz, S., & Gà¶ritz, A. S. (2017). An integrative model of leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 84-101.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Tannenbaum, R. (1961). Leadership and organization: a behavioral approach. McGraw-Hill.
• Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Prussia, G., & Hassan, S. (2019). Effectiveness of broad and specific leadership behaviors. Personnel Review, 48(6), 1238-1250.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (2017). The nature of leadership. Sage publications.
• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire manual. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
• Graham, J. W., & Freitag, R. (2019). Social and behavioral sciences in leadership development. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(3), 45-63.
• Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review, 76, 93-102.