Leadership Theory And Practice: Authentic Leadership Self-As

220 Leadership Theory And Practiceauthentic Leadership Self Assessme

This questionnaire contains items about different dimensions of authentic leadership. There are no right or wrong responses, so please answer honestly. Use the scale where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree when responding to each statement.

Respond to the statements about your self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, and relational transparency. Then, sum your responses in each category as instructed and interpret your scores based on the guidelines provided.

This self-assessment aims to measure your authentic leadership qualities. Comparing your scores across the four components will help you identify your strengths and areas for improvement in authentic leadership.

Paper For Above instruction

Authentic leadership has gained prominence as a leadership approach emphasizing genuineness, integrity, and ethical behavior. This paper explores the dimensions of authentic leadership as measured by a self-assessment questionnaire, discussing how these components interrelate and their significance in effective leadership.

Authentic leadership is characterized by four core components: self-awareness, internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, and relational transparency. Each component plays a critical role in shaping a leader’s authenticity and effectiveness. The self-assessment provides a practical tool for leaders to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses in these areas.

Self-awareness is the foundation of authentic leadership. It involves understanding one’s strengths, weaknesses, and core values. Leaders with high self-awareness are able to recognize their emotional responses and motivations, fostering greater authenticity. Such leaders are more likely to act in alignment with their true selves, leading to trust and credibility among followers. According to Gardner et al. (2005), self-awareness allows leaders to develop emotionally intelligent behavior, which enhances their influence.

Internalized moral perspective refers to the guiding principles and values that drive a leader's actions. Leaders with a strong moral perspective rely on internal standards rather than external pressures to make decisions. This component is crucial in establishing ethical standards and maintaining integrity in leadership practice. Walumbwa et al. (2008) emphasize that internalized moral perspective is associated with ethical decision-making and moral development, which underpin authentic leadership.

Balanced processing involves objectively analyzing information and different viewpoints before making decisions. Leaders with high levels of balanced processing are open to feedback and differing opinions, supporting transparency and inclusive decision-making. This trait fosters trust and promotes collaborative problem-solving. A study by Avolio and Gardner (2005) underscores that balanced processing helps leaders avoid biases and promotes fair treatment of followers.

Relational transparency pertains to revealing one’s true self and openly sharing thoughts and feelings with others. Transparent leaders foster trust and genuine relationships with followers, facilitating a supportive work environment. Gardner et al. (2005) argue that relational transparency is vital for building credibility and authenticity within teams, enabling followers to see the leader’s true self.

Understanding these components allows leaders to assess their authenticity and identify areas requiring development. High scores in these areas suggest strong authentic leadership capabilities, fostering engagement, motivation, and ethical conduct. Conversely, low scores indicate potential areas of improvement that could enhance leadership effectiveness.

Authentic leadership is especially relevant in modern organizations where ethical behavior, trust, and integrity are highly valued. Leaders who cultivate self-awareness, moral perspective, balanced processing, and transparency contribute to sustainable organizational success and positive organizational cultures.

In conclusion, examining the four key components of authentic leadership through self-assessment provides valuable insights for developing genuine and effective leaders. By reflecting on and enhancing these areas, leaders can foster a more ethical, transparent, and trusted leadership style that aligns with contemporary organizational values.

References

• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
• Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Doty, D. (2005). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2013). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competiveness and globalization (10th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
• Laschinger, H. K. S., & Fida, R. (2014). The influence of authentic leadership and empowerment on nurses’ work engagement. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(6), 718-727.
• Rego, A., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2009). Authentic leadership and work engagement: The mediating role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 58-75.
• Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What’s your story?” A narrative perspective on authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395-418.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Brewer, N., Wang, P., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Micro-conformity or micro-resistance? An integrative model of how authentic leadership influences followers’ ethical behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 733-752.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.