Learning A Second Language Is A Matter Of Learning A New Set

Learning a second language is a matter of learning a new set of habits or a new set of rules

Explain the two views by using the framework of Structuralism approach proposed by Skinner and Linguistic approach proposed by Chomsky

Paper For Above instruction

Learning a second language has long been a subject of debate among linguists and psychologists, with two prominent perspectives shaping the discourse: the behaviorist (structuralist) view proposed by B.F. Skinner and the innate grammatical framework advocated by Noam Chomsky. These contrasting theories offer distinct explanations of how individuals acquire language skills, especially when learning a second language, and are rooted in fundamentally different assumptions about the nature of language and learning processes.

Skinner's Behaviorist (Structuralist) Approach

B.F. Skinner, a leading figure in behaviorism, asserted that language acquisition is primarily a result of learned behaviors. His approach emphasizes the importance of environmental stimuli, reinforcement, and habituation in shaping language skills. According to Skinner, learning a second language involves adopting new habits through repeated exposure and practice. For example, when learners imitate correct pronunciation or sentence structures, they receive positive reinforcement, which increases the likelihood of repeat behavior. This process is akin to Pavlovian conditioning, where correct language use is rewarded verbally, socially, or through other forms of reinforcement.

In this view, language learning is analogous to forming new habits; learners memorize phrases, imitate native speakers, and adapt their speech patterns based on feedback. Repetition and reinforcement thus are central mechanisms, and mastery depends on the frequency of exposure and the reinforcement of correct language behaviors. Skinner's perspective suggests that teaching methodologies focusing on drills, modeling, and positive reinforcement are most effective, as they establish the desired behavioral patterns in language learners.

For instance, a second language learner practicing vocabulary through flashcards and receiving praise for correct responses exemplifies this approach. The more these behaviors are reinforced, the more habitual they become, leading to improved fluency. Critics argue, however, that mere imitation and reinforcement cannot account for the full complexity of language acquisition, especially the ability to produce novel sentences or understand syntactic structures.

Chomsky's Innate (Linguistic) Approach

Noam Chomsky challenged behaviorist theories, proposing instead that humans possess an innate biological capacity for language acquisition—a "universal grammar." According to Chomsky, this innate framework contains the structural principles that underlie all human languages, allowing children to acquire complex grammatical rules effortlessly and with limited exposure. His approach emphasizes the role of inherent mental structures that guide the learning process, rather than solely external stimuli.

Chomsky argues that learners are not simply responding to reinforcement but are actively constructing grammatical rules internally. When learning a second language, individuals leverage their innate grammatical knowledge, which guides hypotheses about language structure, and adapt this knowledge based on exposure to the new language. Hence, unlike Skinner's view of rote learning, Chomsky asserts that language acquisition involves internal cognitive processes that enable learners to understand and produce novel sentences they have never explicitly encountered.

This perspective explains phenomena such as the ability of children (and language learners) to grasp abstract syntactic rules and core grammatical principles with relatively little explicit instruction. It also accounts for the apparent universality in language acquisition across diverse linguistic backgrounds, suggesting an inborn language faculty that is activated by exposure to language stimuli.

In practical terms, this approach underpins modern language teaching methods that focus on providing meaningful language input and fostering active hypothesis testing, rather than merely repeating and practicing fixed patterns. It also influences methods that emphasize the importance of grammar rules and the internal restructuring of language properties during learning.

Comparison and Implications for Second Language Learning

The behaviorist view and Chomsky's innate hypothesis reflect fundamentally different paradigms. Skinner's approach suggests that second language acquisition can be optimized through behavioral techniques—repetition, reinforcement, and practice—assuming learners are passive recipients of linguistic stimuli. In contrast, Chomsky's perspective underscores the importance of internal cognitive processes and the learner's ability to subconsciously generate language rules, advocating teaching strategies that stimulate active hypothesis testing and rule development.

Modern second language acquisition research often integrates both views, recognizing that external input and interaction are essential, but internal cognitive factors such as universal grammar influence how learners make sense of the language structure. For example, communicative language teaching incorporates meaningful interaction (aligned with Skinner’s emphasis on practice) while also acknowledging the role of innate processing mechanisms that facilitate understanding and producing complex sentences.

Understanding these two perspectives is crucial for designing effective language learning programs. Recognizing that habits can be shaped through reinforcement and repeated practice supports traditional language teaching methods, while appreciating the innate capacities guides innovative approaches like immersive learning and focus on linguistic intuitions.

In conclusion, Skinner's behaviorist model describes language learning as the acquisition of habits through reinforcement, emphasizing external stimuli and practice. Conversely, Chomsky's innate approach highlights the internal, biological structures enabling learners to generate and understand language rules independently of explicit reinforcement. An integrated understanding of both theories informs contemporary practices in second language instruction, aiming to harness the benefits of both external practice and innate cognitive capacities for more effective language acquisition.

References

• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Lennenberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley.
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.
• Pink, D. H. (2011). To Sell Is Human: The Surprising Truth About Moving Others. Riverhead Books.
• White, L. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
• Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. Routledge.
• Long, M. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition.
• Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, Semantics, and Language Education. Cambridge University Press.