Learning Styles: Another Element Of Personality In Learning

Learning Stylesanother Element Of Personality Is Ones Learning Style

Learning styles are a vital element of personality, defining how individuals best absorb information and learn new ideas. The three primary learning styles are visual, auditory, and tactile/kinesthetic, each representing distinct ways people prefer to process information. Recognizing one's learning style can significantly enhance educational and professional development by tailoring learning experiences to fit personal preferences.

Understanding learning styles involves identifying the methods through which individuals retain information most effectively. Visual learners benefit from imagery, diagrams, and written instructions; auditory learners prefer listening to explanations and discussions; tactile/kinesthetic learners learn best through hands-on activities and physical engagement. By tailoring teaching approaches or work training to these styles, educators and employers can improve comprehension, retention, and overall performance.

For example, in a corporate training environment, adjusting delivery methods according to these styles can lead to more effective skill acquisition. Visual learners might benefit from infographics and slide presentations, auditory learners from podcasts or verbal explanations, and tactile learners from role-playing or simulations. Awareness of these styles also helps in personal development, empowering individuals to choose learning strategies that align with their preferences and maximize their potential.

Research indicates that leveraging different learning styles can improve motivation and engagement, ultimately supporting better learning outcomes (Fleming & Mills, 1996). Moreover, understanding these styles contributes to more inclusive learning environments, accommodating diverse preferences and needs within educational and organizational settings (Coffield et al., 2004). Recognizing the importance of learning styles aligns with broader personality elements, such as cognitive and emotional traits, creating a comprehensive approach to personal and professional growth.

References

• Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
• Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1996). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 15(1), 1-20.
• Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies. VARK Learning.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
• Loo, R. (2004). The relationship of learning styles with academic achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), 391–402.
• McCarthy, B. (1980). Better Teaching Workshops: Discovering Your Learning Style. Frank McCarthy.
• Riding, R. J. (2000). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
• Reid, J. M. (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of College Students. Research in Education, 37, 31–39.
• Smith, K. M. (2011). The importance of learning styles in education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 225-231.