Legal And Ethical Scenarios Select Two Of The Scenarios Prov

Legal And Ethical Scenariosselecttwoof The Scenarios Provided Below A

Select two of the scenarios provided below. Analyze the facts in the scenarios and develop appropriate arguments/resolutions and recommendations. Support your responses with appropriate cases, laws and other relevant examples by using at least one scholarly source from the SUO Library in addition to your textbook for each scenario. Do not copy the scenarios into the paper. Cite your sources in APA format on a separate page.

Paper For Above instruction

The selected scenarios for this analysis are Scenario I—Bankruptcy and Scenario III—Insider Trading. Each presents unique legal and ethical challenges that require careful examination of relevant laws, courts’ interpretations, and ethical principles. This paper will analyze the facts in each scenario, develop arguments and resolutions, and provide recommendations based on legal standards and ethical considerations supported by scholarly sources.

Scenario I: Bankruptcy of Rusty Weaver

Rusty Weaver, a project manager, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy to discharge significant debts including $75,000 in credit card debt and $45,000 in student loans. His financial situation shows a monthly income of $5,325 against expenses of $5,200, which include homeschooling and swimming costs but omit college and travel expenses. The trustee approved monthly expenses of $4,227 but disallowed any swimming expenses and sought dismissal of Weaver’s bankruptcy petition.

Under U.S. bankruptcy law, options for debt discharge depend largely on the debtor’s income, expenses, and the nature of the debts. Student loans, unless proven to cause undue hardship, are typically non-dischargeable (11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)). Credit card debts are generally dischargeable unless fraudulently incurred. Weaver's qualification for Chapter 7 depends on whether his income falls below the median income level for his state, which aligns with Means Test criteria (U.S. Courts, 2023). If Weaver’s income is below this median and his expenses do not suggest a substantial abuse of bankruptcy protections, he may qualify for discharge of credit card debt but not for student loans.

The court’s decision to deny the petition based on expenses—particularly the exclusion of swimming costs—could challenge Weaver’s claims of necessary expenses for his children’s well-being or schooling. Courts often scrutinize expenses that are discretionary. Given the importance of homeschooling and extracurriculars for children’s development, Weaver might argue these costs are essential and should be considered reasonable.

If Weaver qualifies for Chapter 7, dischargeable debts would include credit card balances, but not student loans. Should the court dismiss his petition, Weaver has other options, such as reaffirmation of debts, negotiating with creditors, or filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which reorganizes debts with a feasible repayment plan (Mittelstaedt & Schultz, 2020). Each alternative carries different implications for debt relief and financial recovery.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Legally, the dischargeability of debts hinges on the nature of the debts and compliance with bankruptcy procedures. Ethically, Weaver’s responsibility to provide a truthful and complete disclosure of his expenses is paramount. Misrepresenting or omitting significant expenses may constitute misconduct under bankruptcy law, risking denial of discharge or other sanctions (Fellmeth & Abraham, 2019).

Scenario III: Insider Trading

Maggie Mason disclosed confidential information regarding Walgreens’ impending merger during a medical consultation, which her ex-husband Gus Mason then leaked to a securities broker, Olive Green. The broker executed trades based on this information. The question is whether each party engaged in illegal insider trading, and what liabilities and ethical violations are at play.

Insider trading laws prohibit trading based on material, nonpublic information. Under SEC Rule 10b-5, anyone who trades on such information or tips others can be held liable (SEC, 2023). Maggie Mason, as the confidante who disclosed the information, likely committed a breach of fiduciary duty or a duty of confidentiality. Gus Mason, as an insider on the Walgreens board, has a fiduciary duty not to disclose or use material nonpublic information. Olive Green, the broker who executed trades, would be liable for securities fraud if they knew or should have known the information was insider information (SEC, 2023).

Criminal penalties for insider trading can include substantial fines and imprisonment, while civil penalties may involve monetary sanctions and disgorgement of profits (U.S. Department of Justice, 2022). Ethically, these actions breach principles of honesty, fairness, and integrity in financial markets, undermining investor confidence (CFA Institute, 2019).

Legal and Ethical Analysis

In this scenario, Maggie Mason’s disclosure constitutes a breach of professional and ethical duties, possibly violating HIPAA and confidentiality standards. Gus Mason, as the insider, has a fiduciary duty that prohibits trading on her tip. Olive Green, as the broker executing the trades, also has an obligation to verify the legality of the information used.

Liability is likely for all parties involved, and penalties could involve both criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions by the SEC. Morally, engaging in insider trading erodes market integrity and contravenes fundamental ethical principles of fairness and honesty (Karpoff & Lee, 2019).

Conclusion and Recommendations

In both scenarios, the interplay of legal frameworks and ethical standards guides appropriate conduct. Weaver should carefully argue for expenses deemed necessary for his children and consider alternative bankruptcy options if disqualified under Chapter 7. Regarding insider trading, the parties involved must recognize their legal and ethical responsibilities to maintain market integrity. Effective internal controls, disclosure policies, and adherence to fiduciary duties are critical to prevent such misconduct. Overall, picture of fair and lawful behavior aligns with both legal mandates and ethical principles in the business realm.

References

  • CFA Institute. (2019). Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. CFA Institute.
  • Fellmeth, A., & Abraham, F. (2019). Bankruptcy Law and Practice. West Academic Publishing.
  • Karpoff, J. M., & Lee, S. (2019). Ethical aspects of insider trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 597–612.
  • Mittelstaedt, R., & Schultz, J. (2020). Consumer Bankruptcy Law and Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
  • SEC. (2023). Insider Trading. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/
  • U.S. Courts. (2023). Bankruptcy Basics. https://www.uscourts.gov/
  • U.S. Department of Justice. (2022). Insider Trading: Criminal Enforcement. https://www.justice.gov/

Related Assignments