Leslie Snow Manages A Team Of Five Help Desk Operators

Leslie Snow Manages A Team Of Five Help Desk Operators The Cubicles O

Leslie Snow manages a team of five help desk operators. The cubicles of the operators are located a floor below Leslie's office. Each operator is required to log help desk calls into a team database. This database tracks the nature of a problem, the length of the call, and whether the problem was fixed or sent to the engineering department for further investigation. Leslie has a busy schedule, and it is not possible for her to monitor the performance of her team members sitting on a different floor.

Therefore she decides to assess their performance solely on the basis of reports queried from the database. Based on what you have learned about criterion deficiency and contamination, analyze Leslie's performance measurement strategy. Suggest three ways for better performance measurement for Leslie's help desk team.

Paper For Above instruction

Leslie Snow's approach to evaluating her help desk team’s performance based solely on database reports exemplifies a common but flawed method of performance measurement. While such metrics may seem objective and straightforward, they often suffer from two critical issues: criterion deficiency and criterion contamination, which can distort the assessment and hinder improvements in team effectiveness.

Criterion deficiency occurs when the performance measure fails to capture all relevant aspects of an employee’s work. In Leslie’s case, relying exclusively on data logged into the database overlooks important elements such as customer satisfaction, time taken to resolve issues, the quality of troubleshooting, and the operators’ interpersonal skills. These are essential dimensions of help desk performance but remain unmeasured through database metrics alone. For example, an operator might log a call quickly but may do so in a manner that leaves the customer dissatisfied, or perhaps they resolve a problem efficiently but do not document all relevant details, impairing future reviews. Hence, Leslie’s measurement strategy exhibits criterion deficiency because it neglects critical performance facets.

Criterion contamination pertains to the inclusion of measurement factors irrelevant to core performance but which may influence the evaluation inaccurately. By focusing only on database entries, Leslie’s assessment may be contaminated by extraneous factors such as data entry habits, the specific types of calls assigned, or even clerical errors in logging issues. For instance, an operator might be efficient but less meticulous in documenting calls, leading to a lower performance score that does not genuinely reflect their effectiveness. Similarly, the database might inadvertently favor certain call types that are easier to log or resolve, skewing performance evaluations unfairly.

To improve Leslie’s performance measurement, adopting a more comprehensive and balanced approach is essential. First, introducing customer satisfaction surveys post-interaction would capture the subjective quality of service, addressing the criterion deficiency related to service quality. This feedback can be obtained through follow-up calls or online surveys, providing insights into the representatives’ communication skills and problem-solving effectiveness.

Second, implementing supervisor observations and regular performance reviews can offer qualitative assessments that complement quantitative data. Supervisors can evaluate helpers during random audits or shadowing sessions, assessing attributes like professionalism, problem-solving skills, and adherence to protocols, thereby broadening the criteria analyzed.

Third, establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) such as average resolution time, first-call resolution rate, and escalation frequency can give a more nuanced understanding of team performance. These metrics, combined with the database logs and customer feedback, create a multi-faceted performance appraisement system that minimizes criterion deficiency and contamination. This integrated approach ensures that Leslie’s evaluation captures both quantitative efficiency and qualitative effectiveness, fostering targeted improvements and heightened team performance.

In summary, Leslie’s current reliance on database reports is limited by criterion deficiency and contamination, potentially misrepresenting her team’s true performance. Incorporating customer satisfaction surveys, supervisor evaluations, and relevant KPIs will create a more accurate and comprehensive measurement system. Such a balanced approach will enable fairer assessments and facilitate continuous development for her help desk operators, ultimately leading to enhanced service quality and team productivity.

References

• Campbell, J. P., Ginevra, M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Measuring and improving performance: A customer-focused approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 117–132.
• Geroy, G. D., & McCroskey, J. C. (2009). Human performance improvement: Toward a new paradigm. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22(4), 37-52.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Leigh, T. W., & Krause, S. (2019). Using customer feedback to improve customer service: A comprehensive review. Journal of Service Management, 30(4), 422–448.
• Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1228-1263.
• Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (2004). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper Business.
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2018). Goal setting and performance management. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 330-347.
• Steers, R. M., & Sanchez-Runde, C. J. (2011). Performance management: Contemporary issues and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 84-95.
• Werner, J. M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2012). Human resource development. Cengage Learning.
• Wiersma, W. (2009). Research methods in education. Pearson Education.