Like You Have Learned With Nursing Theory Behavior Ch 347231

Like You Have Learned With Nursing Theory Behavior Change Theories An

Like you have learned with nursing theory, behavior change theories and models provide a framework for developing effective health promotion activities. Include the following in your initial post: Introduce a behavior change theory or model. Include the name and key concepts of the theory or model. Discuss your rationale for choosing this theory or model. How can this theory or model be used to address the Healthy People topic and objective you are choosing for the remainder of the course assignments?

Paper For Above instruction

Behavior change theories are essential tools in nursing and public health for developing effective strategies to promote health and manage disease prevention. Among these theories, the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) stands out for its focus on motivation and the psychological needs that foster behavioral change. This paper introduces SDT, discusses its core concepts, provides the rationale for choosing it, and elaborates on its application in addressing a specific Healthy People objective.

The Self-Determination Theory, developed by Deci and Ryan in the 1980s, emphasizes the importance of intrinsic motivation and the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering sustainable behavioral change (Deci & Ryan, 1985). Unlike extrinsic motivation, which is driven by external rewards and punishments, SDT posits that individuals are more likely to adopt and maintain health behaviors when they are internally motivated and feel that their actions are self-directed. The core concepts of SDT include three innate psychological needs: autonomy (control over one’s actions), competence (effectiveness in one's activities), and relatedness (connection to others) (Ryan & Deci, 2000). When these needs are satisfied, individuals experience enhanced motivation, well-being, and persistent behavioral change.

I chose SDT because of its comprehensive focus on motivation, a critical factor in health behavior change. Unlike models that primarily address environmental or cognitive aspects, SDT centers on internal psychological processes, making it particularly effective in fostering long-term adherence to health behaviors. This theory aligns well with many health promotion initiatives because it recognizes the individual's capacity for self-regulation and the importance of supporting autonomy to facilitate lasting change (Ng et al., 2012).

Applying SDT to the Healthy People initiative—specifically the objective of increasing physical activity among adults—demonstrates its practical utility. For instance, promoting physical activity through programs that empower individuals to choose activities they enjoy (autonomy) and build confidence in their abilities (competence) can significantly enhance intrinsic motivation. Supportive environments that foster social connections (relatedness) can further reinforce engagement. Interventions grounded in SDT might include personalized coaching, community support groups, and educational strategies that emphasize self-initiated goals, all designed to satisfy psychological needs and sustain behavioral change over time.

In conclusion, Self-Determination Theory’s emphasis on motivation, autonomy, and psychological needs provides a valuable framework for health promotion efforts aligned with Healthy People objectives. Its focus on fostering internal motivation can lead to more enduring health behavior change, making it an appropriate and effective choice for addressing public health challenges such as increasing physical activity among adults.

References

• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Teixeira, P. J., Carraca, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 78.
• Williams, G. C., Grow, H. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 70(3), 361-370.
• Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(8), 857-870.
• Vallerand, R. J., & Legault, C. (2000). On the nature of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The case of music. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 32(3), 229.
• Slevec, J. C., & Strugh, J. (2018). A review of self-determination theory and health behaviors. Health Psychology Review, 12(3), 345-358.