Linear Survey And Levels: Reconstructing The College's Surfa

Linear survey and levels: Reconstructing the College's surroun

The assignment involves conducting a topographical survey of a designated area surrounding a college to develop a scaled drawing, including level information. Students are required to select appropriate control stations, record main measurements, and produce detailed survey drawings using AutoCAD. The process includes setting a local coordinate system, performing a closed traverse to determine the coordinates and levels of all points, and creating a contour map of the area. Additionally, a comprehensive technical report must describe the survey methods, equipment used, accuracy analysis, errors encountered, corrections applied, and suggestions for process improvements. The report should be structured with clear sections, including an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion, and include relevant references. Supporting data such as record sheets and sketches must be included in the appendices, with proper explanations in the main body.

Paper For Above instruction

Performing a detailed topographical survey of the college’s surrounding area necessitates a systematic and precise approach rooted in fundamental surveying principles. The initial phase involves selecting strategic control stations around the area, which serve as the foundation for all subsequent measurements. These stations should be positioned to maximize coverage and accessibility, ensuring they are easily identifiable and stable for repeated measurements. For this project, the first control station's coordinates are set at (1000 m, 2000 m, 10 m) within a local coordinate system, serving as the primary reference point.

To establish the control network, a closed traverse will be conducted by measuring distances and angles between the control stations, ensuring measurements are accurate and reliable. The traverse will incorporate standard surveying techniques, such as using a total station or theodolite for angular measurements and tape or EDM for linear distances. Careful attention must be paid to avoid common errors like misreading instrument scales or recording errors, and correction factors such as instrumental and atmospheric errors must be considered and applied as necessary. The accuracy of the measurements should be verified through reciprocal observations and arithmetic checks, ensuring the coordinate calculations are precise and consistent.

Once the control stations are established, the next step involves detailed topographical measurements from these points. This includes recording features such as building corners, trees, footpaths, and paved areas, using standard symbols and annotations to facilitate clarity in the final drawing. These features are essential to create an accurate representation of the area’s physical conditions. The standard booking system will guide the detailed measurement process, ensuring that each feature's position is precise and reproducible. The measurements of levels, obtained through leveling techniques, will incorporate the use of an automatic level or dumpy level. Level readings at key points and control stations will be recorded, with corrections applied for collimation, curvature, and refraction to ensure height accuracy.

The data collected will be used to produce a scaled topographical drawing in AutoCAD, incorporating borders, title blocks, a north arrow, and standard symbols for features like buildings, vegetation, and utilities. This drawing serves as a professional document, suitable for further planning and development. The contour map, generated through interpolating the point data, provides insights into the area's slope and elevation changes, vital for feasibility assessments and design considerations. Methods such as triangulation or interpolation techniques will be employed to generate smooth contour lines, with particular attention to accuracy and detail.

The technical report accompanying the survey will critically analyze the methods and procedures used, emphasizing the equipment accuracy, sources of measurement error, and the rectifications made. It will evaluate the overall quality of the work against industry standards, noting areas where procedures could be improved—such as instrument calibration, environmental corrections, or data processing techniques. The report should include a reflective section discussing potential enhancements for future surveys, like adopting more advanced equipment or automated data collection techniques to minimize human error and increase efficiency. Conclusions will synthesize the findings, highlighting the survey’s adequacy for project purposes and recommending further steps if needed.

References

• Irvine, W. (2006). Surveying for Construction (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
• Muskett, J. (1995). Site Surveying (2nd ed.). Blackwell Science.
• Bannister, A., & Baker, R. (1994). Solving Problems in Surveying (2nd ed.). Longman.
• Uren, J., & Price, W. F. (2010). Surveying for Engineers (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Leica Geosystems. (2020). Total Station and Electronic Distance Measurement (EDM) Techniques. Leica Geosystems Publications.
• Harrison, S. (2018). Principles of Leveling in Modern Surveying. Journal of Surveying Technology, 12(3), 145–162.
• Mahmood, A., & Kumar, S. (2019). Accuracy and Error Corrections in Land Surveying. International Journal of Geospatial Science, 10(2), 130–144.
• Green, R., & Brown, T. (2017). AutoCAD for Surveying and Mapping. Autodesk University Press.
• Government of United Kingdom. (2015). Technical Guidance on Land Surveying and Mapping Standards.
• Cheng, J., & Lee, H. (2021). Advances in Digital Terrain Modelling and Contour Generation. Geospatial Information Science, 24(4), 301–312.