List Of Approved Systematic Reviews Capstone Project
List Of Approved Systematic Reviewsnr451 Capstone Projectdirectionspl
List of Approved Systematic Reviews NR451 Capstone Project Directions: Please choose ONE topic and its corresponding systematic review that is of most interest to you, or most relevant to your practice. This systematic review will be the basis for your capstone project. Please refer to the guidelines for each milestone for more details.
The practice issue must pertain to a systematic review that you must choose from a list of approved reviews based on your interests or your practice situation.
Formulate a significant clinical question related to the topic of the systematic review that will be the basis for your capstone change project. Relate how you developed the question. Describe the importance of this question to your clinical practice previously, currently, or in the future. Also, describe what a research-practice gap is.
Paper For Above instruction
The process of developing a capstone change project in nursing requires careful selection of an evidence-based foundation, such as a systematic review, that addresses a pertinent clinical issue. This approach ensures that the project is grounded in current scholarly evidence, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and advancing nursing practice.
For this project, the first step involves selecting an appropriate systematic review from a list of approved topics. Examples from the provided list include reviews on labor delivery methods, early skin-to-skin contact, infection prevention through preoperative bathing, wound care, pediatric obesity interventions, hospital readmissions, and discharge planning for older adults. Selection should be based on relevance to the nurse’s clinical environment, interest, or identified practice gaps. For instance, a nurse working in maternity care might choose the systematic review on pushing or bearing down methods during the second stage of labor or early skin-to-skin contact, to improve patient outcomes and care protocols.
Once a review is selected, the next step is to develop a clinical question that directly relates to the systematic review’s focus. The question should be specific, measurable, and relevant to practice change. For example, a nurse interested in improving postpartum care might formulate the question: “Does immediate skin-to-skin contact postpartum improve maternal-infant bonding and breastfeeding success?” The development of this question involves identifying current practice issues, reviewing existing literature, and pinpointing areas needing improvement or further investigation.
In understanding how to develop this question, it is crucial to examine existing practices, identify gaps or inconsistencies, and consider patient-centered outcomes. By critically appraising the systematic review, the nurse can tailor the question to fill a knowledge or practice gap. This process is essential because it ensures that the project addresses a meaningful problem that can be adjusted through evidence-based interventions.
The importance of this formulated question lies in its potential impact on clinical practice. For example, if the systematic review supports the benefits of skin-to-skin contact, implementing policies promoting immediate postpartum contact can improve neonatal health, maternal satisfaction, and breastfeeding rates. Such evidence-based changes can enhance care quality, reduce hospital stays, and promote healthier outcomes for mothers and infants.
Furthermore, understanding the research-practice gap is critical in designing effective interventions. The research-practice gap refers to the disconnect between what research evidence indicates and what is routinely practiced in clinical settings. It often occurs due to barriers like lack of awareness, resistance to change, limited resources, or organizational constraints. Identifying this gap helps clinicians and administrators develop strategies to bridge the divide, such as staff education, policy updates, or establishment of new protocols.
Overall, selecting an appropriate systematic review, developing a targeted clinical question, and understanding the research-practice gap are foundational steps in implementing an effective, evidence-based change project. These steps ensure that patient care is continuously improved based on current best practices, ultimately translating research into meaningful clinical outcomes.
References
- American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (3rd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Author.
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2017). Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. CD009124. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD009124.pub3
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2016). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. CD003519. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD003519.pub4
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2015). Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. CD004985. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD004985.pub5
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (2015). Wound-care teams for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. CD011011. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD011011.pub2
- Janicke, D. M., Steele, R. G., Gayes, L. A., Lim, C. S., Clifford, L. M., Schneider, E. M., & Western, S. (2014). Systematic review and meta-analysis of comprehensive behavioral family lifestyle interventions addressing pediatric obesity. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(8), 959-969.
- Leppin, A. L., Gionfrido, M. R., Kessler, M., Brito, J. P., Mair, F. S., Gallacher, K., & Montori, V. M. (2014). Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(7), 1095-1105.
- Webster, J., & Osborne, S. (2015). Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD004985. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD004985.pub5
- Moore, Z. E. H., Webster, J., & Samuriwo, J. (2015). Wound-care teams for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9), CD011011. https://doi.org/10.1002/.CD011011.pub2
- Chamberlain Library Permalink. (2018). Updated guidelines for capstone projects. [Details omitted for brevity.]