Locate The Paragraphs You Wrote For The Earlier Assessments

Locate The Paragraphs You Wrote For The Earlier Assessmentsscenario

Locate the paragraphs you wrote for the earlier assessments. Scenario: Your chosen organization has determined that its mission statement needs to be updated accurately to reflect its strategy for the upcoming year, so you are forming a small team to work through this problem. Which functions do you want to select team members from? Why? What ethical principles does your team need to consider when making updates to a mission statement?

Finally, what critical thinking questions does your team need to ask to update the mission statement? (Note: You will not be creating a new mission statement for this assessment.) Step 1: Download and save Assessment 4 Template [DOCX]. Step 2: Copy your paragraphs from Assessments 2 and 3 directly into the template. Step 3: Write two paragraphs (additional paragraphs can be created as needed). In the first paragraph, address which functions you want to select team members from to develop a new mission statement. Why? What skills and characteristics make a good team member? In the next paragraph, what ethical principles does your team need to consider when making updates to a mission statement? Also include what critical thinking questions your team needs to have answered to update the mission statement. Step 5: Add an introduction paragraph. Step 6: Add a conclusion paragraph. Step 7: Include all reference list citations and in-text citations. Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Font and font size: Times New Roman, not larger than 12-point font. Organization: Your writing should be well-organized and written in clear, succinct language. Template: Use the Assessment 4 Template [DOCX] to help you organize your paper. Grammar: Your work should be free of grammar and punctuation errors that would distract the reader's understanding of the content. Length: 4–6 paragraphs, in addition to references, plus prior work from Assessments 2 and 3. Resource

Paper For Above instruction

In initiating the process of updating a mission statement within an organization, careful selection of team members from relevant functions is crucial. Ideally, team members should be drawn from departments directly involved with strategic planning, marketing, human resources, and operations. These functions possess vital insights into how the organization’s strategic objectives align with its day-to-day activities and future goals. For example, members from the strategic planning department can provide a long-term perspective on organizational direction, while those from marketing can ensure that the mission resonates with external stakeholders. Furthermore, cross-functional teams foster diverse perspectives, promoting a comprehensive understanding of the organization's mission while ensuring that the updated statement accurately reflects the organization’s core purpose and strategic intentions. The characteristics of a good team member include strong communication skills, openness to diverse viewpoints, analytical thinking, and ethical integrity. Such traits facilitate effective collaboration and ensure that the team collaboratively produces a mission statement that embodies the organization’s values and strategic vision.

When updating a mission statement, ethical principles are fundamental to guide the decision-making process. The team must consider principles such as honesty, transparency, and respect for stakeholder interests. Ensuring that the mission remains authentic and aligned with the organization’s core values is critical, especially as the organization adapts to new strategic directions. Moreover, ethical considerations involve avoiding misrepresentation or overpromising, which could damage stakeholder trust. Critical thinking questions that need answering include: Does the proposed mission reflect the organization’s true purpose? Are the values expressed comprehensive and inclusive? How does the updated mission align with current societal norms and expectations? What future challenges might impact the organization’s capacity to fulfill the mission? Addressing these questions helps ensure the mission statement remains relevant, ethical, and strategically aligned with organizational goals. The process of ethical reflection combined with critical inquiry is essential to crafting a mission statement that is both inspiring and grounded in integrity.

In conclusion, selecting the right cross-functional team members and adhering to ethical principles are fundamental steps in effectively updating an organization’s mission statement. Cultivating a team with diverse skills and integrity guarantees a well-rounded and authentic representation of the company’s purpose. Furthermore, applying ethical principles and critical thinking ensures that the mission statement not only serves as a strategic guide but also maintains the organization’s credibility and trustworthiness. As organizations evolve, continuous reflection on core values and strategic objectives helps secure long-term sustainability and stakeholder confidence. The process thus demands meticulous planning, ethical consideration, and critical evaluation to produce a compelling and authentic mission statement that aligns with organizational aspirations and societal expectations.

References

1. Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business Review Press.
3. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1994). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 262–274.
4. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
5. Vale, R. (2018). Ethical Leadership in Organizations: Concepts and Practice. Routledge.
6. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3), 315–327.
7. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
8. Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. (2004). Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. HarperBusiness.
9. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
10. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.