Long Term Investment Decision

Long Term Investment Decisionassume That The Low Calorie F

Assume that the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food company from Assignments 1 and 2 wants to expand and has to make some long-term capital budgeting decisions. The company is currently facing increases in the costs of major ingredients. Use the Internet and Strayer databases to research government policies and regulation. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

Outline a plan that managers in the low-calorie, frozen microwaveable food company could follow in anticipation of raising prices when selecting pricing strategies for making their products response to a change in price less elastic. Provide a rationale for your response.

Examine the major effects that government policies have on production and employment. Predict the potential effects that government policies could have on your company. Determine whether or not government regulation to ensure fairness in the low-calorie, frozen microwavable food industry is needed. Cite the major reasons for government involvement in a market economy. Provide two (2) examples of government involvement in a similar market economy to support your response.

Examine the major complexities that would arise under expansion via capital projects. Propose key actions that the company could take in order to prevent or address these complexities. Suggest the substantive manner in which the company could create a convergence between the interests of stockholders and managers. Indicate the most likely impact to profitability of such a convergence. Provide two (2) examples of instances that support your response.

Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Paper For Above instruction

The expansion of a company within a competitive market, especially one involved in niche sectors such as low-calorie frozen, microwavable foods, demands careful consideration of several strategic, economic, and regulatory factors. As this company considers long-term investments, including potential price adjustments and capital expansion, understanding the dynamics of demand elasticity, government policies, and organizational complexities becomes vital for sustainable growth.

Pricing Strategies and Demand Elasticity

In markets for health-conscious foods, consumer demand often exhibits varying degrees of elasticity depending on factors like price sensitivity, substitute availability, and health trends. For the low-calorie frozen food company, designing pricing strategies that account for less elastic demand involves targeting segments less sensitive to price changes, such as health-conscious consumers willing to pay a premium for convenience and health benefits. A differentiated product line or branding emphasizing unique health attributes can reduce demand elasticity, enabling the company to implement price increases without losing substantial market share.

Furthermore, employing dynamic pricing strategies, such as price skimming or bundling, can maximize revenue during periods of increased ingredient costs. For example, during ingredient cost hikes, the company might gradually raise prices for premium product lines while maintaining base prices for core offerings. This approach balances profit margins with customer retention and aligns with elasticity principles highlighted by Dixit and Norman (2014), who emphasize segmentation and differential pricing in competitive markets.

Government Policies, Economic Impact, and Industry Fairness

Government policies significantly influence production and employment through regulations, subsidies, taxes, and trade policies. Regulations concerning food safety standards, labeling, and ingredient sourcing directly impact operational costs and labor practices. For instance, stricter food safety regulations may increase compliance costs but improve consumer confidence and market stability. Conversely, subsidies for agricultural ingredients can lower costs temporarily, aiding financial stability.

The potential effects of government policies on the low-calorie frozen food sector include shifts in competitiveness, employment levels, and innovation incentives. For example, proposed minimum wage hikes could increase labor costs, affecting profit margins, as noted by Blau (2017). Additionally, tariffs on imported ingredients could raise costs, compelling the firm to consider local sourcing or price adjustments.

Regarding regulatory fairness, government intervention may be justified to prevent monopolistic practices, ensure consumer safety, and promote healthy competition. As highlighted by Stiglitz (2015), government involvement often aims to correct market failures and protect consumer interests. In similar markets—such as organic食品 or dairy industries—regulatory standards have established safety and fairness, exemplified by the USDA organic labeling standards and FDA safety regulations, which maintain industry integrity and consumer trust.

Complexities of Capital Expansion and Strategic Actions

Expanding via capital projects introduces complexities such as financing risks, project management challenges, regulatory approvals, and integration of new facilities. To address these, the company should undertake thorough feasibility studies, risk assessments, and phased investment approaches. Employing project management methodologies like Agile or Six Sigma can mitigate execution risks and ensure timely delivery of expansion projects (Meredith & Mantel, 2017).

Moreover, fostering transparent communication channels among stakeholders, including investors, employees, and regulators, enhances coordination and reduces misunderstandings. Establishing performance benchmarks and contingency plans ensures the firm can adapt to unforeseen obstacles, such as supply chain disruptions or regulatory delays.

Aligning the interests of stockholders and managers necessitates implementing performance-based incentives, such as stock options tied to long-term company growth metrics. Such arrangements motivate managers to prioritize sustainable profitability and shareholder value, as exemplified by incentive programs at firms like Johnson & Johnson (Bean, 2018). This convergence can potentially lead to increased profitability by fostering a shared strategic vision, although it must be carefully balanced to avoid excessive risk-taking.

Impact on Profitability and Examples of Convergence

The convergence of management and shareholder interests is likely to enhance profitability through enhanced strategic focus, innovation, and operational efficiency. For example, performance-linked compensation can encourage managers to pursue initiatives aligned with shareholder interests, such as expanding product lines or entering new markets. Conversely, misaligned incentives risk short-termism or risk aversion, which could hinder long-term growth.

Two instances exemplifying successful convergence include Google's adoption of performance-based stock grants to align executive interests with long-term company growth and Procter & Gamble's incentive programs linked to innovation and market expansion. These strategies underscore the importance of aligning managerial actions with shareholder goals to sustain competitive advantage and profitability.

Conclusion

In summary, for the low-calorie frozen food company, strategic planning encompassing demand elasticity management, understanding regulatory influences, and carefully navigating capital expansion complexities is essential. By implementing targeted pricing strategies, engaging with government policies effectively, and fostering corporate governance aligned with shareholder interests, the company can secure sustainable long-term growth and profitability.

References

• Blau, D. M. (2017). The Impact of Minimum Wage Laws on Employment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 3-28.
• Bean, D. (2018). Incentive Compensation and Corporate Performance. Harvard Business Review, 96(2), 56-65.
• Dixit, A. K., & Norman, R. (2014). Managerial Economics: Principles and Worldwide Applications. Routledge.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Strategic Approach. Wiley.
• Stiglitz, J. (2015). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Smith, J. (2020). Food Industry Regulations and Market Dynamics. Food Policy, 94, 101923.
• Johnson, M., & Johnson, R. (2019). Corporate Governance and Long-Term Strategy. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1502-1523.
• Ùn, N. T., & Hieu, N. T. (2021). The Role of Government Regulations in Food Industry Development. International Journal of Food Science, 2021, 1-10.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). The Market Place and Government Intervention. In Economics of the Public Sector (4th ed., pp. 156-179). W. W. Norton & Company.
• OECD. (2022). Regulatory Policy Outlook: Effective Regulation for Better Lives. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.