Look At A Common Element In The Society You Live In

Look At A Common Element In The Society In Which You Live Marriage I

Look at a common element in the society in which you live. Marriage is a good example. Try to explain this as if you were new to the whole concept. Ask yourself, why do people do it? How does it contribute to society? Is there any other way to accomplish what it does? Now imagine that you are reporting to members of a different planet about your findings. Determine a sociological perspective to develop your analysis.

Paper For Above instruction

Marriage is a fundamental social institution prevalent across societies worldwide, serving multiple sociological functions. From a functionalist perspective, marriage contributes significantly to social stability, social cohesion, and the regulation of sexual behavior. It provides a framework for establishing family units, which are seen as the building blocks of society. The social norms and roles associated with marriage help maintain order and foster societal continuity (Parsons, 1955). This perspective emphasizes that marriage fulfills essential needs for companionship, economic stability, and raising offspring, ensuring the survival and stability of society.

Symbolically, marriage also carries cultural significance, often embodying societal values, religious beliefs, and collective identities. It serves as a rite of passage, affirming social status and reinforcing cultural traditions (Durkheim, 1912). In addition, marriage plays a role in the transmission of social capital—networks and resources that benefit individuals and communities (Bourdieu, 1986). Through shared commitments, it fosters social bonds that extend beyond the nuclear family to the broader society, enhancing social integration.

From a conflict perspective, marriage can also be viewed as a social construct that perpetuates inequalities. Power dynamics within marriage often mirror larger societal inequalities, such as gender roles and economic disparities (Marx & Engels, 1848). Historically, marriage has reinforced patriarchy by granting men authority over women and controlling reproductive rights. In contemporary society, disparities in labor division, decision-making authority, and access to resources continue to reflect and reinforce systemic inequalities (Collins, 2009).

According to a sociological perspective, alternative arrangements such as cohabitation or communal living could theoretically serve some functions of marriage, such as social bonding and even economic cooperation. However, these alternatives may lack the formal recognition and societal support that marriage provides, which might influence stability and legal rights. For example, in some societies, marriage grants legal benefits like tax advantages, inheritance rights, and parental rights that cooperative arrangements may not confer as readily (Cherlin, 2009).

Furthermore, from a symbolic interactionist view, marriage is a social construct that is constantly negotiated and redefined through individual interactions and societal expectations. The meanings attached to marriage evolve over time, influenced by cultural, religious, and personal factors (Goffman, 1959). The decision to marry, the expectations involved, and the behaviors associated with marriage are shaped by ongoing social interactions and societal norms.

In conclusion, marriage functions as a vital socio-structural element that promotes social stability, cultural continuity, and individual well-being, while also perpetuating certain inequalities. Viewing marriage through various sociological perspectives highlights its complex role within society, revealing both its integrative functions and its potential to reinforce social disparities. These insights emphasize the importance of understanding marriage not merely as a personal choice but as a multifaceted social institution with broad societal implications.

References

• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
• Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. Vintage.
• Collins, R. (2009). Interaction, symbols, and social structure. Sociology Conflicts and Change, 214-226.
• Durkheim, É. (1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. Oxford University Press.
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
• Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). The Communist Manifesto.
• Parsons, T. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Free Press.