Looking For Good Work For The Following Assignment Needed
Looking For Good A Work For The Following Assignment Need Done By S
Looking for Good A++ work for the following Assignment. Need done by Saturday September 5. No plagiarism please. Good quality work. For your Reaction Paper, you have two options. Please review them carefully to ensure you choose the one from which you will benefit most. Note that each option must be written in essay format (do not answer the questions in a question/answer format). The essay must include a clear introduction (including a thesis), body and conclusion in APA format. The sample paper attached to the assignment details provides a clear example of the formatting and paper expectations for this assignment.
OPTION ONE: The focus of this option is our secondary text, Confusing Love with Obsession.
Your paper should be at least five pages (roughly 1,250 words) in length. While additional sources or references are not required for this assignment, you must use the selected source to support your argument (i.e., cite the selected sources in your paper). If you choose to quote, paraphrase, or summarize additional sources (including the texts), you must document them in APA format. Your paper must have a references page.
These are the questions/points to consider to which you should respond in your reaction paper: Using sociologist John Alan Lee's love styles from Intimate Relationships (based on this list, what is the predominant love style for most of the characters presented in the book, Confusing Love with Obsession)? What character, if any, did you identify with most from the book? This can be either yourself or someone you know. Briefly outline the characteristics of the Obsessive Love Wheel at each stage of the wheel. After reading the book, what knowledge did you gain about love addiction?
OPTION TWO: This option allows you to choose from a selection of chapters of books by scholar Deborah Tannen that are available electronically from the APUS library.
As with the other option, your paper should be at least five pages (roughly 1,250 words) in length. Additional sources or references are not required for this assignment, but if you quote, paraphrase, or summarize a source (including the reading or the text), you must document it following APA format. These are the questions/points to ponder that you can use to develop your reaction paper, but feel free to ask yourself additional questions. Remember that this paper should give your reaction to what you have read, meaning you may agree, disagree, or both. However, you cannot merely say you agree.
You must explain why clearly. After reading the selection you have chosen, think about either your own situation that reflects the subject of the reading or about situations with which you are familiar, or both. You should not use full names or real people, please! It is preferable to give people aliases rather than use their names. Outline some of the characteristics of the communication situations described and analyzed in the reading.
Did you identify with the people and situations in the selection? How? If not, how do you engage differently in interpersonal communication in similar situations to the ones described and analyzed? After reading the selection, what knowledge did you gain about interpersonal communication in general? Here is the selection of readings: Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends (2005) Deborah Tannen Read Chapters Two, Three, and Four; Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families (2007) Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, eds. Read Chapter 1 plus any other chapters, 2-11; Gender and Discourse (1994) Deborah Tannen
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment offers two options for a reaction paper, each requiring an analytical and reflective essay of approximately 1,250 words, formatted in APA style with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The first option involves analyzing the themes of love and obsession based on the secondary text Confusing Love with Obsession, integrating sociologist John Alan Lee’s love styles, particularly focusing on the Obsessive Love Wheel, and reflecting on insights gained about love addiction. The second option entails selecting and critically engaging with chapters from Deborah Tannen’s works, emphasizing personal reactions, identification with characters or situations, and understanding interpersonal communication patterns. The paper must be well-structured, properly cite sources, and provide a references page.
Paper For Above instruction
Choosing between the two options for this reaction paper allows for a comprehensive exploration of either romantic attachment or conversational dynamics, both core themes in communication studies. Both options demand critical analysis, personal reflection, and scholarly integration to demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter and its relevance to real-life experiences.
Option One involves an in-depth examination of love, particularly distinguishing love from obsession. Utilizing John Alan Lee’s love styles—Eros, Ludus, Storge, Mania, Agape, and Pragma—this essay would analyze the characters in Confusing Love with Obsession to identify their predominant love styles. A key focus would be on Mania or obsessive love, characterized by possessiveness and intense emotional dependency, as illustrated through the Obsessive Love Wheel. The essay should explore how these characters exemplify stages within this wheel, such as infatuation, dependency, crisis, and potential recovery or burnout. Additionally, reflecting on personal insights gained about love addiction—its psychological mechanisms and societal influences—would enrich this analysis. Critical discussion should include whether the characters’ behaviors align with clinical descriptions of love addiction, considering the implications for understanding unhealthy relational patterns.
Option Two centers on analytical reading of Deborah Tannen’s chapters dealing with conversational style, family discourse, and gendered communication. This approach emphasizes personal reaction, identification with characters or situations, and insights into everyday communication processes. For example, analyzing conversational styles can reveal how men and women navigate similar topics differently, often leading to misunderstandings or strengths in interpersonal relationships. The essay could include personal anecdotes or observations, highlighting differences in communication approaches and how these align or conflict with the scenarios presented in the reading. A critical reflection on how this understanding influences one’s interpersonal interactions, both personally and professionally, would round out the paper. The key is to demonstrate thoughtful engagement with the material, connecting theory to experience.
References
- Lee, J. A. (1973). Love styles. In J. Alan Lee, Intimate Relationships (pp. 51-78).
- Deborah Tannen. (2005). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Chapter 2-4.
- Deborah Tannen. (2007). Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families. Chapter 1; Chapters 2-11.
- Deborah Tannen. (1994). Gender and Discourse.
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 7th Edition.
- Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2001). The social dimension of love: An evolutionary perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 179–183.
- Fisher, H. (1998). Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Henry Holt & Company.
- Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (2009). A Evolutionary Perspective on Love and Relationships. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 85–105). Sage.
- Gordon, C., & Kendall, S. (2007). Family talk and identity formation. In D. Tannen, S. Kendall, & C. Gordon (Eds.), Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families (pp. 1–20).
- Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Wiley-Blackwell.