Lumpsum Analysis 14 Mar 22 In Project 3 You Will

Removedtab 1 Lumpsum Analysis14 Mar 22in Project 3 You Will Analys

In Project 3, you will analyze managerial and costing information to improve the company's EBITDA. This involves utilizing knowledge of cost behavior, activity-based costing, and cost-volume-profit analysis to make informed operational improvements for LGI.

Paper For Above instruction

Analyzing managerial and costing data is critical for enhancing a company's profitability and operational efficiency. In the context of Project 3, LGI’s management seeks to optimize their EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) by deploying advanced cost analysis techniques such as activity-based costing (ABC) and cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis. This comprehensive approach allows the company to identify profitable product lines, allocate costs more accurately, and make strategic decisions regarding production and product offerings.

Introduction

In today’s competitive manufacturing landscape, understanding detailed cost behavior and the precise allocation of overhead costs are vital for strategic decision-making. Managers need reliable insights into the profitability of different products to allocate resources effectively and to identify areas where operational efficiencies can be gained. The application of activity-based costing (ABC) and CVP analysis provides granular insights that traditional costing methods often overlook. This paper evaluates LGI’s current cost structures, assesses product profitability, and proposes operational adaptations to maximize EBITDA.

Cost Analysis and Profitability of Standard and Deluxe Boxes

LGI produces two primary product lines: Standard Boxes and Deluxe Boxes. To evaluate their profitability, we must analyze the revenues, variable costs, fixed costs, and resulting profits on an annual basis. As per Project 2 calculations, the monthly figures for each product are multiplied by 12 to obtain annual data, assuming stable monthly sales volumes.

For the Standard Boxes, with sales of 9 million units per month at a price of $22, annual revenue amounts to $2.376 billion (9 million x $22 x 12). The variable costs are $10 per unit, totaling $1.08 billion annually. Fixed costs are allocated at a lump sum basis; thus, dividing fixed expenses equally based on sales volume may distort true product profitability. The traditional analysis suggests that Standard Boxes contribute significantly to EBITDA, but the precision of profit margins must be further refined by allocating fixed costs based on actual activity drivers.

Similarly, the Deluxe Boxes, with sales of 1.5 million units at $30 per unit, generate annual revenue of approximately $540 million, with variable costs at $20 per box totaling $360 million annually. Fixed costs allocated based on current lump sum assumptions may underestimate or overestimate the true profitability contribution of the Deluxe category.

Limitations of Lump Sum Cost Allocation

The current fixed cost allocations, based solely on a lump sum approach, do not consider the actual consumption of overhead resources by each product. This method can lead to inaccurate profit assessment, especially when fixed costs are substantial. For example, if Deluxe Boxes utilize a different proportion of production capacity or resource usage, then fixed costs should be allocated accordingly to reflect their true contribution margin. As such, the CEO perceives that Deluxe Boxes are less profitable than they appear and contemplates discontinuing this product line.

Refined Cost Allocation: Sales Volume Method

To better estimate product profitability, the sales volume method allocates fixed costs proportionally based on the relative sales volumes. By calculating the percentage of total sales volume attributable to each product annually, fixed costs are apportioned more accurately. For example, with total annual sales volume of 10.5 million boxes (9 million Standard + 1.5 million Deluxe), Standard Boxes account for approximately 85.7% of sales; Deluxe Boxes for about 14.3%. Accordingly, fixed costs should be allocated in the same ratio, providing a clearer picture of each product's operational profitability.

Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Approach

The ABC method further refines overhead allocation by associating costs with specific cost drivers such as labor hours, machine hours, or number of purchase orders. This approach recognizes that different products may consume overhead resources disproportionately. For instance, Deluxe Boxes might require more inspection hours or purchase orders, thereby justifying higher overhead allocations. The collected data (factory overhead, depreciation, maintenance, inspection, etc.) are assigned based on actual driver consumption, enhancing the accuracy of profit calculations.

Impact of Sustainable Materials and Pricing Strategies

Considering sustainability initiatives, LGI explores producing a Sustainable Deluxe Box with lower variable costs ($11 per box) and a new selling price of $23, which could potentially increase market share among environmentally conscious consumers. The cost reductions from sustainable materials could improve profit margins if fixed costs are managed efficiently, but the sales volume impact remains uncertain. The company could also adopt a further pricing strategy to align with profit margin targets, comparing markup rates necessary to achieve similar profitability levels as their standard product line.

Decision-Making Considerations

The primary decision involves whether to continue or phase out the Deluxe product line. The analysis must consider not only profit margins but also strategic factors like market positioning, environmental responsibility, and long-term growth prospects. Employing detailed costing and profitability analysis ensures that decisions are data-driven, reducing the risk of misallocating resources and potentially jeopardizing overall EBITDA improvements.

Conclusion

Effective analysis of managerial and costing information through methods like ABC and CVP enables LGI to pinpoint profit drivers and reallocate resources for maximum EBITDA. Moving beyond simplistic lump sum fixed costs to activity-based cost allocation provides a nuanced understanding of product profitability, ensuring that strategic decisions such as discontinuing a product are based on accurate financial insights. In the pursuit of operational excellence and sustainable growth, integrating these advanced costing techniques is indispensable for LGI.

References

• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Harvard Business School Press.
• Collier, P. M., & Yamey, B. (2014). Management Accounting Techniques. Routledge.
• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2017). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Innes, J., & Mitchell, F. (2005). A review of approaches to overhead allocation. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 1(2), 219-240.
• Enoch, C., & McLaren, T. (2019). Cost Management: Strategies for Business Success. Wiley.
• Shank, J. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1993). Strategic Cost Management: The New Tool for Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 131-138.
• Zarwan, Z., & Ahmad, S. (2021). The use of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) for strategic decision-making. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2), 219-245.