M3 Lesson 12 Discussion Create An Original Posting With A Mi

M3 Lesson 12 Discussioncreate An Original Posting With A Minimum Of

Discuss the scenario where a researcher investigates higher cancer rates in Community A compared to Community B, using data from surveys on lifestyle, business types, and medical records. Address the following: what makes this a descriptive study, what data collection methods are used, why the researcher collected specific information, and whether causation can be established based on these data.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario presented involves a researcher examining differences in cancer rates between two communities, Community A and Community B, by collecting and analyzing various types of data. This setup exemplifies a descriptive study because it aims to characterize and compare existing conditions, behaviors, and environmental factors associated with the communities without manipulating any variables. The primary goal is to describe the current state of affairs—such as lifestyle choices, business presence, and medical history—to understand potential patterns or associations related to the incidence of a rare cancer.

The data collection methods employed in this scenario include surveys, observations, and review of medical records. Surveys are used to gather information about residents' lifestyles, specifically smoking behaviors and health practices like annual checkups. Observation of the types of businesses present provides contextual environmental data that may influence health outcomes. Review of medical records offers objective, clinical data regarding cancer diagnoses, further supporting descriptive analysis by providing concrete health-related information.

Descriptive studies commonly utilize methods like surveys, interviews, medical record reviews, and observational data collection. These approaches serve to establish a comprehensive picture of existing variables and their distributions within a population. Unlike experimental designs, descriptive research does not focus on establishing causal relationships but rather on identifying patterns, correlations, or associations that can inform further analytical or experimental research.

The researcher collected detailed information about the lifestyle of community residents, including smoking and healthcare behaviors, to identify potential habits or factors associated with higher cancer risk. Data about the types of businesses—such as a chemical plant in Community A—aim to explore environmental exposures that could contribute to health outcomes. Reviewing medical records provided clinical confirmation of cancer diagnoses, enabling the researcher to relate environmental and behavioral factors with actual health data.

While the collected data can suggest associations, the researcher cannot definitively establish causation solely based on these descriptive data. For instance, the presence of the Toxico Chemical Plant and higher smoking rates in Community A are associated with higher cancer rates, but without experimental or longitudinal studies, it remains uncertain whether these factors directly cause the increased cancer incidence. Similarly, lower smoking rates and absence of a chemical factory in Community B are associated with lower cancer rates, but causality cannot be confirmed without controlling for confounding variables or conducting further causal research.

Therefore, while this study provides valuable descriptive insights into potential risk factors and environmental influences, establishing causation would require more rigorous experimental or longitudinal methodologies that can account for confounding factors and demonstrate temporal relationships. Overall, the research serves as an essential preliminary step in identifying possible risk factors that warrant further investigation through more definitive research designs.

References

• Bachman, L. (2018). Research Methods for Public Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Hennekens, C. H., & Buring, J. E. (1987). Epidemiology in Medicine. Little, Brown and Company.
• Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24–25.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Rutberg, S. (2019). Descriptive Research. SAGE Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin.
• Schnittker, J., & Bcek, C. (2014). Causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 25(4), 556–562.
• Vogt, W. P. (2011). Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.