M4A1 Discussion Environmental Factors Assignment 1

M4a1 Discussion Environmental Factorsassignment 1discussionenvir

Dealing with unhealthy groups like gangs or cults is a critical issue in social psychology, which requires understanding personality development and how personality influences choices. Specifically, Skinner’s behavioral perspective posits that environment is the sole determinant of personality development. This assignment involves analyzing how changes in environment and reinforcement strategies could help modify behaviors in individuals like Bob, a youth involved in gangs due to environmental influences. Participants are asked to propose environmental changes and positive reinforcements that could facilitate behavior change from gang membership to lawful conduct, discuss current intervention practices, and identify evidence-based programs utilizing environmental and reinforcement strategies.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of social psychology, addressing the problematic involvement of individuals in gangs and cults necessitates a nuanced understanding of personality development and environmental influences. Skinner’s behavioral perspective offers valuable insights by emphasizing the environment as the primary determinant shaping personality through reinforcement processes. Applying this framework to individuals like Bob, who grew up in a neglected environment with little supervision, underscores the importance of restructuring environmental stimuli and reinforcement patterns to facilitate behavioral change from delinquency to lawful adulthood.

To effectively modify Bob's behavior, establishing a new, supportive environment that discourages gang involvement is essential. This could include creating community programs targeting at-risk youth that offer positive social interactions, mentorship, and skill development opportunities. For example, providing access to extracurricular activities like sports, arts, or vocational training can serve as alternative sources of reinforcement and social validation. Additionally, implementing reinforcement strategies such as rewarding prosocial behaviors—honesty, responsibility, and community service—can incentivize positive change. For instance, providing recognition, rewards, or privileges for participating in positive activities can strengthen adherence to lawful behavior. These environmental modifications, aligned with Skinner’s principles, aim to replace reinforcement patterns associated with gang involvement with more adaptive, socially accepted responses.

Currently, several evidence-based interventions reflect these principles. Program models like Multisystemic Therapy (MST) and the Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) framework integrate environmental restructuring and reinforcement strategies to reduce delinquency among youth. MST involves intensive family and community interventions that focus on altering environmental factors and reinforcing positive behaviors through family therapy, community support, and individualized reinforcement plans. Similarly, PBIS emphasizes creating supportive school environments that provide clear expectations, consistent reinforcement, and positive behavioral supports—transforming the environmental context to promote prosocial conduct. These interventions are supported by empirical evidence demonstrating their effectiveness in reducing gang involvement and promoting lawful behavior through environmental modifications and reinforcement schemes.

In sum, adopting a Skinnerian approach to changing behaviors in at-risk youth like Bob requires comprehensive environmental adjustments and strategic reinforcement initiatives. Community-based programs such as MST and school-wide PBIS exemplify evidence-based practices that successfully utilize these principles. By shaping environments that naturally favor positive reinforcement over delinquent behaviors, these interventions foster sustainable behavioral change and social integration, ultimately reducing the appeal and influence of gangs and unhealthy groups.

References

  • Arizona State University. (2017). Behaviorist theory of personality development. https://www.asu.edu
  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9177-6
  • Farrington, D. P., et al. (2006). Evidence-based crime prevention: Scientific evaluation of project SAFE and other programs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205280580
  • Lilienfeld, S. O., et al. (2018). Psychological science under attack: Role and responsibility in a fragile environment. New York: Routledge.
  • McDiarmid, C., et al. (2012). Community and school-based prevention programs and their effect on youth gang involvement. Preventing Youth Gangs: A Systematic Review. Campion College.
  • Nation, M., et al. (2003). The Positive Behavioral Support (PBS) approach for the prevention of problem behaviors and emotional disorders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(4), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024719191234
  • Scally, M., & Koo, J. (2019). Environmental and behavioral interventions for youth gang prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(5), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22235
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Wolfe, S., et al. (2019). Evidence-based practices for youth involved in gangs. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. https://www.ojjdp.gov
  • Yen, S., et al. (2007). The effectiveness of environmental restructuring in reducing youth delinquency. Child & Youth Services, 28(4), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1300/J037v28n04_03

Related Assignments