Madeline Pain And Suffering: Madeline S Is A 66-Year-Old Ger

Madeline Pain And Sufferingmadeline S Is A 66 Year Old German Woman

Madeline: Pain and Suffering Madeline S. is a 66-year-old German woman admitted to a home care agency for care related to end-stage cardiac disease and renal failure. She has complained of chronic generalized chest pain, frequent cramps in her legs, and worsening arthritis pain related to her immobility. The home care nurse has been in contact with Madeline's physician almost daily for the past week and her analgesics have been steadily increased with little pain relief but an increase in nausea, constipation and sedation. The nurse feels frustrated as she observes Madeline declining rapidly with worsening depression, withdrawal and weeping. Madeline's neighbor has noticed that her lights are left on 24 hours a day and the nurse has noticed that Madeline has several rosaries and prayer books now at her bedside.

Madeline has refused referral to hospice but the home care nurse has requested a team conference with assistance from the local hospice affiliated with the home care agency. Discussion Questions: 1. What disciplines should be included in the case conference? 2. What additional assessment might the nurse obtain? 3. How can this patient's pain and suffering best be treated?

Paper For Above instruction

In managing end-of-life care for patients like Madeline S., a multidisciplinary team approach is essential to address the complex physical, psychological, and spiritual needs associated with advanced illness. The primary goal is to optimize quality of life, alleviate suffering, and respect patient autonomy while providing compassionate support. This essay discusses the relevant disciplines to include in the case conference, explores additional assessments for Madeline, and proposes comprehensive strategies to manage her pain and suffering effectively.

Disciplines to Include in the Case Conference

Given Madeline's complex health situation, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should be assembled to provide holistic care. This team should encompass healthcare professionals from several disciplines, each offering specialized insights and interventions. Key participants include:

  • Palliative Care Physician: To assess and manage end-of-life symptoms, coordinate care plans, and facilitate decision-making aligned with the patient’s wishes.
  • Primary Care Physician or Cardiologist: To oversee the management of cardiac and renal conditions, adjusting medications, and monitoring disease progression.
  • Nurse Care Coordinator: To facilitate communication among team members, monitor symptom management, and provide ongoing assessment and support.
  • Pharmacist: To review medication efficacy and side effects, especially concerning analgesics, and suggest alternatives or dosing adjustments.
  • Social Worker: To provide emotional support, assess social needs, and assist with resource planning, including support for the family and addressing social isolation.
  • Spiritual Care Provider or Chaplain: To support Madeline's spiritual needs, especially considering her use of rosaries and prayer books, and to offer comfort aligned with her faith.
  • Psychologist or Mental Health Specialist: To evaluate depression, emotional well-being, and provide appropriate psychological interventions or counseling.

Integrating these disciplines ensures comprehensive care, addressing physical symptoms, emotional distress, spiritual needs, and social factors impacting Madeline’s quality of life.

Additional Assessments the Nurse Might Obtain

To tailor interventions more effectively, the nurse should gather detailed assessments beyond current observations. These include:

  • Pain Assessment: Utilizing validated tools such as the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) or Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale to quantify pain intensity, distribution, and character.
  • Psychological Evaluation: Screening for depression and anxiety using tools like the PHQ-9 or GAD-7, considering Madeline’s deteriorating mood and withdrawal.
  • Spiritual and Cultural Assessment: Exploring her spiritual beliefs, preferences, and practices through open-ended questions, especially considering her prayer artifacts and apparent spiritual distress.
  • Nutritional and Hydration Status: Assessing her weight, hydration status, and appetite, which are critical given her renal failure and declining health.
  • Functional Status and Mobility: Evaluating her level of mobility, ability to perform activities of daily living, and any needs for assistive devices or mobility aids.
  • Signs of Depression or Emotional Distress: Observing for withdrawal, weeping, changes in sleep patterns, or expressions of hopelessness, and considering early interventions.

Gathering comprehensive data will aid in developing individualized care plans that address all facets of her suffering, ensuring a more targeted and compassionate approach.

Strategies to Best Treat Madeline’s Pain and Suffering

Managing pain and suffering in terminally ill patients like Madeline requires a multidimensional approach that combines pharmacological, non-pharmacological, psychological, and spiritual interventions. These strategies include:

Pharmacological Management

The core of pain relief involves optimizing analgesic therapy. Given her inadequate response and side effects, a reassessment of her current regimen is essential. Opioids such as morphine or fentanyl can be titrated carefully to control pain while minimizing side effects like nausea and sedation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be contraindicated due to renal failure, so alternatives like acetaminophen or adjuvant medications such as anticonvulsants or antidepressants for neuropathic pain should be considered. To address nausea associated with analgesics, antiemetics like ondansetron can be utilized, and laxatives are essential to prevent constipation.

Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Complementing medications, non-pharmacological approaches such as heat or cold therapy, massage, relaxation techniques, music therapy, and controlled breathing exercises can help reduce pain perception and offer emotional comfort. Ensuring her environment is calm and familiar can alleviate anxiety and promote a sense of security.

Psychological and Emotional Support

Addressing depression and emotional distress is crucial. Counseling, psychotherapy, or support groups focusing on end-of-life issues can help Madeline process her feelings of despair and withdrawal. Consistent presence from empathetic caregivers and spiritual support can significantly reduce feelings of isolation.

Spiritual Care and Support

Considering her use of prayer books and rosaries, spiritual care providers can offer tailored spiritual support, prayer, and rituals aligned with her beliefs. Facilitating her spiritual practices can provide comfort and a sense of peace amidst suffering.

Addressing Social Needs

Maintaining social connections, such as visits from family and friends, and addressing any social determinants affecting her well-being are important. She may also benefit from community resources or assistance in managing her household needs, especially if she remains independent at home.

Conclusion

Successful management of Madeline's pain and suffering demands a holistic, patient-centered approach integrating medical, psychological, spiritual, and social interventions. A multidisciplinary team, persistent reassessment, and respect for her preferences—including her refusal of hospice referral—are vital to providing compassionate, dignified end-of-life care. Ensuring her comfort and supporting her emotional well-being can significantly enhance her quality of life, even in her final days.

References

  1. Breitbart, W., & Textor, E. (2012). Spiritual and religious issues in end-of-life care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 15(12), 1378–1383.
  2. Hui, D., et al. (2014). Management of pain in terminally ill patients. The Lancet, 383(9924), 706-717.
  3. Johnson, M. J., & O’Connor, M. (2015). Palliative and end-of-life care: Essentials in pain and symptom management. Oxford University Press.
  4. Muross, C., & McLoughlin, M. (2017). Comprehensive palliative care: Multidisciplinary approaches. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 19(4), 362-370.
  5. WHO. (2018). WHO definition of palliative care. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
  6. Hancock, S., & Chochinov, H. (2008). Spirituality and palliative care. Palliative & Supportive Care, 6(2), 99-104.
  7. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. (2018). Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care. 4th edition. NCP.
  8. O’Connor, M., et al. (2019). Pharmacologic management of pain in end-stage disease. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 58(5), 834-843.
  9. Ross, J. S., & Collet, D. (2019). Addressing anxiety and depression in palliative care. Advances in Palliative Care, 6(2), 56-63.
  10. Steinhauser, K. E., et al. (2012). Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, and healthcare providers. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(9), 1350–1359.

Related Assignments