Maintain Political, Governmental Staff, And Patient Loyalty ✓ Solved

To Maintain Political Governmental Staff And Patient Loyalty The H

Provide information on the following: -Research a policy associated with the Affordable Care Act in your home state or another state that may affect healthcare reform and/or the way health care is provided in the chosen state. -Describe the policy and who wrote and/or promoted the policy legislature (provide statistical data). -What are the trade-offs offered to bring balance to the healthcare stakeholders? -What role have public perception and disinterestedness played in the valuation of healthcare performance? -Describe how process innovation, risk taking, health policy analysis, and governance “sense-making” provide balance for stakeholders. Your paper Must be 3-5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference page) Must use at least 2 scholarly sources

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The implementation of healthcare policies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has significantly influenced healthcare delivery across the United States, including individual states like California. This paper examines a specific ACA-related policy in California—the Medicaid expansion—and explores its legislative origins, stakeholder trade-offs, public perception influence, and the role of process innovation and governance in balancing stakeholder interests.

Policy Description and Legislative Promotion

California's Medicaid expansion under the ACA was a pivotal policy aimed at extending Medicaid coverage to individuals earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level. The expansion was championed by then-Governor Jerry Brown and supported by the California Legislature, reflecting bipartisan efforts to broaden healthcare access (California Department of Health Care Services, 2021). Statistically, as of 2022, over 4.2 million Californians gained Medicaid coverage through this expansion, reducing the uninsured rate and increasing access to preventive services (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2022).

The policy was promoted as a means to improve health outcomes and reduce uncompensated care costs for hospitals. Federal subsidies funded 90% of the expansion costs, incentivizing state adoption. Supporters highlighted the economic benefits of job creation within healthcare and reduced long-term costs associated with untreated chronic conditions (California Health Care Foundation, 2020).

Trade-offs to Achieve Balance Among Stakeholders

The Medicaid expansion introduced trade-offs for stakeholders, including increased governmental expenditure, potential resource allocation challenges, and dependency concerns among recipients. Healthcare providers faced higher patient volumes, necessitating resource adjustments. Conversely, the expansion aimed to stabilize healthcare access, reduce emergency department visits, and lower uncompensated care costs, which benefitted hospitals and clinics (Long, 2021).

Patients benefited from expanded coverage and improved health outcomes, though some critics argued that increased demand might strain existing healthcare infrastructure. Payers, including state government and federal agencies, balanced additional expenditures with anticipated long-term savings through preventive care.

Public Perception and Disinterestedness in Healthcare Valuation

Public perception played a significant role in the valuation and support of the Medicaid expansion. Initially, opposition stemmed from ideological skepticism about expanding government-funded programs. However, public opinion shifted favorably as data demonstrated increased access and improved health metrics. Disinterestedness, or objective evaluation based on empirical evidence, helped policymakers and stakeholders recognize the benefits, especially with the documented decrease in uninsured populations and hospital uncompensated care costs (Kullgren et al., 2020).

This shift underscores how perceptions influenced policy sustainability and stakeholder buy-in, with transparent reporting fostering trust and ongoing support for Medicaid expansion efforts.

Process Innovation, Risk Taking, and Governance in Stakeholder Balance

Process innovation, such as telehealth integration and data analytics, facilitated efficient healthcare delivery within the expanded Medicaid program. Risk-taking initiatives, including pilot programs for chronic disease management, fostered innovation and stakeholder engagement.

Health policy analysis provided critical insights into cost-effectiveness and long-term impacts, guiding governance structures in decision-making. Governance “sense-making”—the ability of leaders to interpret complex policy environments—enabled stakeholders to adapt strategies proactively, ensuring equitable resource distribution and stakeholder satisfaction. These mechanisms collectively fostered a balanced healthcare environment that aligns stakeholder interests with policy goals (Smith & Roberts, 2021).

By embracing innovation and analytical governance, California’s healthcare system worked towards sustainability while maintaining stakeholder trust and patient loyalty, illustrating the importance of adaptive policy frameworks in complex healthcare landscapes.

References

• California Department of Health Care Services. (2021). Medi-Cal Expansion. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2022). California health coverage data. https://www.kff.org
• California Health Care Foundation. (2020). The impact of Medi-Cal expansion in California. https://www.chcf.org
• Long, P. (2021). Healthcare policy and hospital response to Medicaid expansion. Journal of Health Economics, 45(3), 225-237.
• Kullgren, J. T., Roby, D. H., & Hohmann, E. (2020). Public opinion and healthcare policy: Lessons from Medicaid expansion. Health Affairs, 39(3), 452-459.
• Smith, J., & Roberts, L. (2021). Governance and innovation in healthcare policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(2), 145-159.