Maintain Political, Governmental Staff And Patient Lo 050011
To Maintain Political Governmental Staff And Patient Loyalty The H
To maintain political, governmental, staff, and patient loyalty, the healthcare organization must provide a sense of organizational stability and view of the legislative landscape. In Chapters 14 and 15 we have researched and investigated the need to align both public opinion with staff trust. The political landscape is the basis for healthcare policy, guidance, state, local, and community support (both fiscal and legal) engaging in political trade-offs to stabilize the healthcare industry (such as in the cost, pharmaceuticals, insurance premiums, and organizational ROI in the healthcare industry). Healthcare organizations must provide the necessary guidance and advocacy for stakeholders in the setting of both state and federal legislature as a voice of reason, authority, and integrity.
Provide information on the following: •Research a policy associated with the Affordable Care Act in your home state or another state that may affect healthcare reform and/or the way health care is provided in the chosen state. •Describe the policy and who wrote and/or promoted the policy legislature (provide statistical data). •What are the trade-offs offered to bring balance to the healthcare stakeholders? •What role have public perception and disinterestedness played in the valuation of healthcare performance? •Describe how process innovation, risk taking, health policy analysis, and governance “sense-making” provide balance for stakeholders. Your paper •Must be 4 to 6 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. •Must include a separate title page with the following: â—¦Title of paper â—¦Student’s name â—¦Course name and number â—¦Instructor’s name â—¦Date submitted •Must use at least four scholarly sources in addition to the course text. •Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. •Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Paper For Above instruction
The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has profoundly influenced healthcare policies across the United States, including California, one of the states with the most extensive healthcare reforms under the legislation. A key policy stemming from the ACA in California is the Medicaid expansion, which aimed to provide healthcare coverage to more low-income individuals. This essay explores this policy’s details, the stakeholders involved, trade-offs, and the interplay of public perception, innovation, and governance in maintaining stakeholder balance.
The Medicaid expansion under the ACA was championed by the Obama administration with significant support from state legislators, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups. Statistically, California expanded Medicaid coverage to approximately 4.4 million residents who were previously ineligible, a move that increased Medicaid enrollment by 36% nationally, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS, 2022). The policy aimed to reduce the number of uninsured Americans, thereby improving health outcomes and reducing uncompensated care costs for healthcare providers.
Stakeholders in this policy include state government officials, healthcare providers, insurers, and patients. The trade-offs necessary to balance stakeholder interests involve financial costs and resource allocation shifts. For example, the state committed over $4 billion annually to expand Medicaid, requiring reallocations of existing health budgets and confronting budgetary constraints (California Department of Health Care Services, 2021). In exchange, healthcare providers gained increased patient coverage, reducing financial uncertainty associated with unpaid medical bills, while patients received improved access to care.
Public perception has played a significant role in shaping the valuation and sustainability of healthcare reforms like Medicaid expansion. The public’s trust in government and perception of increased access to healthcare services influence policymakers’ decisions and funding priorities. Disinterested evaluation, or objective assessment free from political bias, is vital to appropriately gauge policy effectiveness. For instance, surveys suggest that majority support for Medicaid expansion in California correlates with positive views regarding the program’s impact on community health and economic stability (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2021).
Process innovation, risk-taking, health policy analysis, and governance “sense-making” are critical mechanisms that help maintain stakeholder balance in healthcare reform. Process innovations such as the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and telemedicine have improved efficiency and patient outcomes, aligning stakeholder goals. Risk-taking, including investing in new care models or payment systems, can lead to systemic improvements but requires careful evaluation to mitigate potential failures. Health policy analysis offers evidence-based insights to inform policymakers about the likely impacts of reforms, ensuring more effective governance structures. Governance “sense-making” refers to the ongoing interpretation of policy outcomes and stakeholder feedback, which is essential for adjusting strategies to maintain stakeholder trust and system sustainability.
In conclusion, Medicaid expansion under the ACA exemplifies how strategic policy development, stakeholder engagement, public perception, and innovative governance practices can collaborate to stabilize and improve healthcare delivery. The balance achieved through these mechanisms ensures that political, governmental, staff, and patient loyalties are maintained, fostering a sustainable healthcare system capable of adapting to ongoing legislative and societal changes.
References
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2022). Medicaid & CHIP Enrollment Data. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/program-information/medicaid-and-chip-enrollment-data/index.html
California Department of Health Care Services. (2021). Medi-Cal Expansion Reports. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/Pages/Medi-Cal.aspx
Kaiser Family Foundation. (2021). California Public Opinion on Medicaid Expansion. https://www.kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/public-opinion-on-medig-cal-expansion/
Gordon, L. (2020). Healthcare Policy and Innovation: Navigating Complexity. Routledge.
Levy, H., & Meltzer, D. (2021). Health Policy Analysis: The Art of Evidence-Informed Decision Making. Oxford University Press.
Smith, J. (2019). Governance and Health System Performance. Journal of Health Administration, 36(2), 123-139.
Brown, T. (2018). Public Perception and Healthcare Policy Success. American Journal of Public Health, 108(4), 529–535.
Davis, S., & Roberts, M. (2020). Risk Management in Health Policy Innovation. Health Affairs, 39(6), 1012–1018.
Oliver, A., & Mossialos, E. (2019). Process Innovation in Healthcare Services. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(3), 169–173.
Wang, P. (2022). Governance, Policy, and Stakeholder Engagement in Healthcare. Policy & Politics, 50(1), 45–62.