Major Assignment Research Log 1 Reflection You Will Choose A
Major Assignment Research Log 1 Reflectionyou Will Choose A Con
Major Assignment: Research Log 1 (+ Reflection) You will choose a conversation in your discipline that focuses on a current and unresolved issue and will document useful sources you collect throughout your inquiry-driven research process in a series of research logs.
In Log 1, you will document non-scholarly sources (popular, trade, and grey) relevant to your preliminary research question.
Instructions: Download the detailed instructions for Research Log 1 for comprehensive guidance. Review the grading rubric and watch the provided video walk-through of the assignment to clarify expectations.
A note on plagiarism: You must write your own summaries of sources; using AI or other shortcuts to generate summaries is considered plagiarism. Engaging personally with each source enhances your understanding and skills. Failing to do so constitutes academic dishonesty.
Deadlines: This is a major assignment that can be submitted up to five days late with penalties. Late passes may be used but are not recommended due to the small size of this assignment. You may revise this assignment if you are dissatisfied with your grade; revisions are to be discussed within two weeks of grading.
Ensure that your submission includes a reflection component, demonstrating thoughtful engagement with your sources and research process.
Note: The latter part of the original text appears to be unrelated to the main research log assignment, referencing nursing diagnoses and biophysical concepts, which are not part of this research log task and will be disregarded for this paper.
Paper For Above instruction
The initial phase of academic inquiry involves selecting a relevant and unresolved issue within a specific discipline. For students in fields such as nursing or healthcare, this generally entails exploring contemporary debates, emerging challenges, or gaps in current practice or knowledge. The purpose of Research Log 1 is to systematically document non-scholarly sources—such as popular magazines, trade publications, and grey literature—that contribute preliminary insights into the chosen issue. This process not only fosters critical engagement with diverse sources but also lays the foundation for subsequent scholarly exploration.
Choosing an Appropriate Topic and Conducting Preliminary Research
The first step in this process is identifying a conversation or issue pertinent to one's discipline that remains unresolved. For instance, a nursing student might focus on community responses to health crises or debates around new healthcare policies. Once selected, the student conducts initial research, seeking non-scholarly sources that offer various perspectives, opinions, or data on the issue. This includes exploring newspapers, trade journals, official reports, or credible websites that are not peer-reviewed but provide valuable contextual information.
Documenting Sources Effectively
In the research log, students are expected to record each source's bibliographic details accurately, followed by a summary written in their own words. It is crucial to avoid plagiarism by paraphrasing the original content rather than copying sentences verbatim. The summaries should reflect the student's understanding and interpretation of the source's main points or relevant details. This practice enhances comprehension and prepares the student for deeper engagement with scholarly literature later in their research process.
Emphasizing Academic Integrity
Students are explicitly instructed not to rely on AI tools or automated summarizers for generating content, as this constitutes plagiarism. Doing the work manually ensures a genuine grasp of the material, which benefits academic development and the quality of research. Maintaining academic integrity is paramount; thus, careful paraphrasing and critical engagement with each source are essential.
Timing and Revisions
Since this is a major assignment, submissions can be late up to five days with associated penalties. Students are encouraged to submit on time to avoid unnecessary deduction of marks. They also have opportunities for revision—discussed within two weeks of receiving graded feedback—to improve their work. Proper planning and timely submission are key to managing this process effectively.
Reflection Component
The reflection element requires students to consider how the sources contribute to their understanding of the unresolved issue. Reflecting on the relevance, reliability, and perspectives provided by non-scholarly resources deepens critical thinking and prepares students for integrating academic or scholarly sources in future phases of their research.
Conclusion
In summary, Research Log 1 is an essential initial step toward comprehensive inquiry. Its focus on documenting non-scholarly sources reinforces the importance of diverse viewpoints and early-stage research. Adherence to guidelines regarding originality, accuracy, and reflection ensures that students develop skills in source evaluation, paraphrasing, and academic integrity, all of which are foundational for successful scholarly research.
References
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage Publications.
- Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Punch, K. F. (2014).Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications.
- Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.