Manager Dilemma Running Head: Managers Dilemma

Managers Dilemmarunning Head Managers Dilemma1managers Dilemma4man

The client, Tess Motors, has hired the Three Amigos research firm to address specific challenges related to their high-end electric vehicles. The core focus of the research is to determine whether computer failures or abrupt car stalls are more significantly influenced by the vehicle's electronic system, with particular attention to whether the onboard computer is a causal factor. The company has recently experienced electronic issues such as road stallings, unresponsive door handles, and malfunctioning touchscreens, raising concerns over product quality and its impact on consumer confidence and safety. The study aims to identify whether the onboard computer (independent variable) contributes to these problems and how this potential relationship affects consumer perceptions, especially in light of recent negative reports and the company's growing sales volume.

Background context emphasizes Tess Motors' reputation as a luxury electric vehicle manufacturer and the importance of maintaining high quality standards. Their prior accolade from Consumer Reports (Hirsch, 2014) is at risk due to recent electrical malfunctions, which have compromised vehicle safety and reliability. As the company plans to scale up sales from 637 to approximately 20,000 units, understanding the causal link between onboard computer systems and vehicle failures becomes critical for quality control and customer satisfaction.

The research involves evaluating whether the onboard computer significantly causes vehicle stalls or other electronic failures. The key research questions are: (1) Is Tesla’s quality control capable of producing defect-free vehicles? and (2) Does the presence of an onboard computer increase the likelihood of vehicle fires? The hypotheses posit that defect rates in manufacturing may influence consumer reports, and that onboard computers might be linked to fire risks, thus affecting consumer confidence and safety ratings. The study is designed to be completed over 90 days, with measurable benchmarks such as defect counts and incident reports to validate the hypotheses.

Paper For Above instruction

In recent years, the automotive industry has witnessed significant technological advancements, particularly in electric vehicles (EVs), which leverage sophisticated onboard computer systems to enhance performance, safety, and user experience. However, these technological innovations also introduce complex challenges related to quality control, safety, and consumer perception. For manufacturers like Tess Motors, maintaining high standards of performance and safety is essential, especially given their premium market positioning and the high expectations of their clientele. This paper explores the managerial dilemma faced by Tess Motors regarding the potential link between onboard computer systems and vehicle failures, emphasizing the importance of quality control and safety in technological integration.

Understanding the nature of electronic failures in EVs requires a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including manufacturing processes, component integrity, software reliability, and system integration. Recent incidents reported by Tess Motors, such as unexplained stalls, unresponsive features, and potential fire hazards, underscore the necessity to determine whether these issues stem from the onboard computer or other underlying causes. From a managerial perspective, such problems threaten brand reputation, customer trust, and future sales, making it imperative to identify and address the root causes effectively.

One critical aspect of this managerial dilemma involves assessing the quality control processes in place at Tess Motors. The company’s ability to produce defect-free vehicles directly influences consumer confidence and safety perceptions. A higher defect rate, particularly in electronic components, can lead to negative reviews, recalls, and even legal liabilities. The hypothesis that Tesla’s quality control issues could negatively influence consumer report ratings aligns with research indicating that manufacturing defects are a primary driver of consumer dissatisfaction (Kumar & Saini, 2016). Therefore, strengthening quality assurance protocols and implementing rigorous testing procedures are strategic managerial actions essential for mitigating these risks.

Moreover, the potential link between onboard computers and fire incidents presents a significant safety concern. In recent years, reports of EV fires, often associated with battery or electronic failures, have garnered media attention and influenced consumer perceptions (Johnson, 2020). The hypothesis that onboard computers increase fire risk reflects the need to scrutinize the electronic architecture and software safety protocols employed by Tess Motors. Managers must decide whether the current systems meet industry safety standards and whether additional safety features or software updates are necessary to prevent such hazards.

Addressing these managerial dilemmas involves a multi-faceted approach. First, implementing comprehensive testing and quality control measures can reduce defect rates and improve overall vehicle reliability. This includes adopting advanced diagnostic tools, real-time monitoring of manufacturing processes, and rigorous end-of-line testing to detect defects before vehicles reach consumers. Second, conducting in-depth safety assessments of onboard electronic systems, including failure mode analysis and fire risk evaluations, is essential. Collaborating with cybersecurity and electronic safety experts can help identify vulnerabilities and develop mitigation strategies.

Furthermore, transparent communication with consumers regarding vehicle safety and quality assurance efforts is vital to maintaining brand trust. Leveraging customer feedback, data analytics, and continuous improvement frameworks can ensure that Tesla addresses operational shortcomings promptly. The use of predictive analytics to detect potential failures before they occur can also serve as a proactive managerial strategy to enhance product reliability.

In conclusion, the managerial dilemma faced by Tess Motors encapsulates the intersection of technological innovation, quality management, and consumer safety. By thoroughly investigating the impact of onboard computer systems on vehicle failures and safety risks, managers can formulate effective strategies to enhance quality control, reduce defect rates, and prevent fire hazards. Ultimately, ensuring the reliability and safety of their vehicles will sustain consumer confidence, preserve their brand reputation, and support sustainable growth in the competitive EV market.

References

• Hirsch, J. (2014). Will Tesla Model S lose Consumer Reports' top recommendation? The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://
• Johnson, M. (2020). Electric vehicle fires: Causes and mitigation strategies. Journal of Automotive Safety, 12(3), 45-59.
• Kumar, P., & Saini, R. (2016). Impact of manufacturing defects on customer satisfaction: A case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(4), 393-410.
• Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2018). Quality control processes in automotive manufacturing: Best practices and challenges. Manufacturing Review, 45(2), 112-124.
• Nguyen, T., & Thompson, L. (2019). Safety and cybersecurity in electric vehicles: Current research and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(7), 2692-2703.
• Peterson, S. (2021). Consumer perception and brand reputation in the electric vehicle industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 255-269.
• Smith, A., & Rogers, H. (2017). Advances in onboard vehicle diagnostics: Ensuring safety and performance. Automotive Technology Review, 10(1), 8-16.
• Wang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2020). The role of predictive analytics in quality assurance for manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107560.
• Young, D., & Patel, R. (2019). Managing risks in high-tech automotive manufacturing. Risk Management Journal, 22(4), 201-213.
• Zhang, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Evaluating the safety performance of electric vehicle systems: A review. Safety Science, 147, 105581.