Managers Often Notice The Relationship Between Attitudes And

Managers Often Notice The Relationship Between Attitudes And Job Perfo

Managers often notice the relationship between attitudes and job performance. They observe behaviors such as enthusiasm or poor attitude and recognize their impact on productivity. However, managers may not always realize their influence on employee attitudes such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment, which significantly affect outcomes like turnover, absenteeism, and overall productivity. This paper examines the work attitudes displayed in the film “Office Space,” analyzes the influence of management style and work environment on employee attitudes, and discusses potential consequences on job commitment and retention. Furthermore, it offers recommendations for managerial strategies that could enhance job satisfaction and organizational health.

Paper For Above instruction

“Office Space,” a popular satirical film, provides a vivid portrayal of workplace attitudes, management style, and organizational culture. The setting at Initech exemplifies a typical corporate environment characterized by a combination of monotonous work, lack of motivation, and dissatisfaction among employees. The film’s characters, in particular Peter Gibbons, reflect various levels of job satisfaction and commitment, influenced largely by their attitudes toward management, co-workers, and their physical work environment.

The Environment at Initech

The work environment at Initech appears to be sterile, uninspiring, and heavily dictated by micromanagement—especially by the character of Lumbergh, the supervisor. The physical surroundings seem drab and uncomfortable, contributing to a stagnant atmosphere that demotivates employees. The supervision style is authoritative and lacking in employee engagement, leading to a feeling that employees are mere cogs in a machine. This type of environment fosters dissatisfaction, as employees feel undervalued, unmotived, and disconnected from the organization's goals. Such environments often result in decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, and high turnover rates, especially when employees perceive the workplace as inhospitable or lacking recognition (Riordan, 2013).

The Observed Job Attitudes of Peter and His Co-Workers

Peter Gibbons exhibits a low level of job satisfaction, evident in his apathy, cynicism, and desire to disengage from his work. His attitude stems from a combination of oppressive management, repetitive tasks, and a lack of personal growth opportunities, which diminish his sense of accomplishment and organizational commitment. Peter’s feelings toward his supervisors are notably negative; he perceives Lumbergh as a condescending and micromanaging boss, further eroding his motivation. Co-workers, such as Michael Bolton and Samir Nagheenanajar, display similar attitudes—frustration, disengagement, and a sense of futility—highlighting a collective organizational apathy. Their attitudes are reinforced by the toxic work environment, poor management practices, and minimal recognition or support, leading to a lack of emotional attachment and commitment to the company (Riordan, 2013).

The Likely Outcomes of Those Attitudes

The negative attitudes displayed by Peter and his co-workers at Initech are likely to lead to adverse organizational outcomes. Low job satisfaction often correlates with higher absenteeism, as employees may seek to avoid an unpleasant work environment (Baumruk, 2004). Additionally, disengaged or dissatisfied employees tend to exhibit higher turnover rates, either seeking better opportunities elsewhere or quitting altogether. Job commitment diminishes when employees do not feel valued or connected to the organization’s mission, potentially impacting overall productivity and quality of work. Moreover, poor attitudes can spread within teams, further deteriorating organizational morale and fostering a cycle of disengagement. Such attitudes underline the importance of effective managerial interventions aimed at improving the work climate and fostering positive employee attitudes (Riordan, 2013).

Conclusion

An effective managerial strategy that could improve employee attitudes at Initech is the implementation of a culture of gratitude and recognition, as emphasized by Riordan (2013). Lumbergh, known for his detached management style, can benefit from adopting more emotionally intelligent leadership practices that promote appreciation and genuine feedback. Simple gestures such as personalized recognition, opportunities for professional development, and fostering team camaraderie can significantly enhance job satisfaction and organizational commitment. For example, managers could introduce regular acknowledgment of individual and team achievements, facilitate social activities that promote bonding, and involve employees in decision-making processes. These changes would likely lead to increased motivation, reduced turnover, and a more positive work environment, ultimately driving better organizational performance.

References

• Baumruk, R. (2004). The Missing Link: The Role of Employee Engagement in Drivers of Success. Workforce Management, 83(9), 48-52.
• Riordan, C. (2013). The power of “Thank you”: 3 steps to a culture of gratitude. HR Specialist, 11(17), 7.
• Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1297-1349.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• Reichard, R. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2007). Foundations of organizational commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(2), 232-250.
• Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A sematic, methodological and professional perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 77–89.
• Vandenberghe, C. (1999). Psychological climate and organizational commitment. Personnel Review, 28(4), 336-357.
• Worley, C. G., & Mohrman, S. A. (2014). Leading the Workforce of the Future. Human Resource Management, 53(6), 651-673.