Managing Talent: General Motors' Commitment To Diversity

Managing Talent General Motors Commitment To Diversity

MANAGING TALENT: General Motors’ Commitment to Diversity

General motor changed drastically by enabling women and minorities to participate in management positions. What GM did can influence other companies to do the same. For example, the way employees contribute with their work. Having different ideas and opinions can have bigger productivity. General Motors had promised to promote women and minorities into management positions, they succeeded its commitment to diversity by representing various groups in leadership positions.

There are some companies that are managed by women. For example, "General Motors Reported Naming First Female CEO Mary Barra (THE WASHINGTON POST, Jena McGregor )." General Motors have an assumption that when employees feel fully accepted for who they are, they will feel free to contribute their talents more fully at work. I agree because they are going to feel more comfortable with themselves and get along with others without having other people judging them for who they are and not for what they bring to the table. They will be more motivated and are able to share more ideas without worrying about what others might say. General Motors measures its efforts by promoting diversity helping it to achieve business and success by having both men and women work together in an environment where business will grow and prosper.

Lastly, it is always good to have two different perspectives, General motor changed drastically by enabling women and minorities to Comment by DEW: repeat participate in management positions. What GM did can influence other companies to do the same. For example, the way employees contribute with their work. Having different ideas and opinions can have bigger productivity. General Motors had promised to promote women and minorities into Comment by DEW: repeat management positions, they succeeded its commitment to diversity by representing various groups in leadership positions.

There are some companies that are managed by women. For example, "General Motors Reported Naming First Female CEO Mary Barra (THE WASHINGTON POST, Jena McGregor )." General Motors have an assumption that when employees feel fully accepted for who they are, they will feel free to contribute their talents more fully at work. I agree because they are going to feel more comfortable with themselves and get along with others without having other people judging them for who they are and not for what they bring to the table. They will be more motivated and are able to share more ideas without worrying about what others might say. General Motors measures its efforts by promoting diversity helping it to achieve business and success by having both men and women work together in an environment where business will grow and prosper.

Lastly, it is very important for women and minorities to have Equal Employment Opportunities. General Motors' appointment of Mary Barra as their first female CEO signifies a substantial step toward diversity and inclusion. It emphasizes the importance of creating a workplace where all employees feel valued and free from discrimination. Providing equal opportunities not only aligns with legal requirements but also fosters a positive organizational culture that promotes innovation, employee satisfaction, and improved business outcomes (Kale, 2013; Williams & O’Reilly, 2015).

Paper For Above instruction

The commitment of General Motors (GM) to diversity, particularly in promoting women and minorities into management roles, exemplifies a strategic approach to human resource management that aligns legal compliance with broader organizational benefits. This paper examines the steps GM has taken to ensure compliance with legal requirements, beyond them, and evaluates the impacts on organizational performance and culture.

Legal requirements for diversity and equal employment opportunity (EEO) are fundamental to prevent discrimination and promote fairness. In the U.S., laws such as the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act (1972) enforce non-discrimination policies (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC], 2022). GM complies with these by adhering to strict antidiscrimination policies, implementing equitable hiring practices, and actively promoting diverse candidates to management. These measures are essential to meet legal standards, but GM extends beyond by embedding diversity into its corporate culture and strategic objectives.

GM’s proactive approach goes beyond legal mandates through initiatives such as leadership development programs specifically aimed at underrepresented groups, mentorship schemes, and diversity councils. For example, GM’s “Growing Diversity and Inclusion” programs aim to foster a workplace where all employees feel valued and empowered (GM Diversity & Inclusion Report, 2020). Such initiatives are designed not only to comply with laws but to create a sustainable culture of inclusion that drives innovation and performance. The strategic focus on celebrating diversity reflects an understanding that organizational success is linked to representation across all levels, including top management.

GM's assumption that employees who feel fully accepted perform better is supported by social identity theory and organizational behavior research (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Robbins & Judge, 2019). When individuals see their identities affirmed and barriers reduced, their sense of belonging increases, leading to higher motivation and engagement. This theoretical framework suggests that diversity initiatives—if authentic—can unlock employees' full potential and contribute significantly to business outcomes. GM’s focus on inclusive culture aims to leverage diverse perspectives, which enhances creativity, problem-solving, and customer insights, thereby driving innovation and competitive advantage (Cox & Blake, 1991).

Measurement of the effectiveness of diversity programs is critical. GM employs metrics such as representation ratios, retention and promotion rates of diverse employees, and employee engagement surveys to evaluate progress. Additionally, analyzing business performance indicators, customer satisfaction, and innovation metrics helps link diversity efforts to tangible outcomes (Harrison & Klein, 2007). For example, GM’s recent product innovations and market share growth in diverse customer segments are indicators that its diversity initiatives positively influence business success.

Research underscores the mutually reinforcing relationship between diversity and organizational performance. Kale (2013) emphasizes that diverse leadership teams make more innovative decisions and can better navigate global markets. Williams and O’Reilly (2015) highlight that inclusiveness enhances employee commitment and reduces turnover costs. By measuring both human capital outcomes and business results, GM can continuously refine its strategies, ensuring ongoing progress toward its diversity goals.

In conclusion, GM's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion extend beyond legal compliance, reflecting a comprehensive strategic commitment. The appointment of Mary Barra as CEO symbolizes a corporate culture that values representation and equality. Such initiatives contribute to a more innovative, motivated, and productive workforce, ultimately supporting business growth and market competitiveness. Continued measurement and refinement of these efforts, supported by academic research, are essential for sustaining organizational success in a diverse global marketplace.

References

• Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What “counts” as diversity management: A comparative review of past and present research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 157-183.
• Kale, S. H. (2013). The power of diversity: How organizations can harness the potential of differences. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 78-85.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Nelson-Hall.
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2022). Laws Enforced by EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/laws-enforced-eeoc
• Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2015). The complexity of diversity and inclusion efforts: Perspectives from practice and research. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 293-316.
• General Motors (2020). Diversity & Inclusion Report. GM Corporate Website.
• McGregor, J. (2014). Mary Barra's ascension at GM signals change. The Washington Post.
• Keyser, J. (2013). Women and men working together: More sustainable, successful work environments. Retrieved from [source].