Manufacturer Of Wood Screws Periodically Examines Screws ✓ Solved
```html
A manufacturer of wood screws periodically examines screws heads
A manufacturer of wood screws periodically examines screws heads for the presence or absence of burrs. Subgroups of 300 screws are selected and examined using a carefully designed procedure. The collected data is as follows: Observation Number of Screws with Burrs.
a- Find the centerline (show your calculations).
b- Find the control limits (show your calculations).
c- Use MINITAB to develop the appropriate control chart.
d- Are there any special causes of variation? Which observations?
e- What to do next?
Question 2: A given model of large radar dish represents the area of opportunity in which nonconformities may occur. Results of quality check for 25 radar assemblies are as follows: Radar Assembly Number Number of Nonconformities.
a- Determine the centerline (show your calculations).
b- Determine the control limits (show your calculations).
c- Use MINITAB to develop the appropriate control chart.
d- Are there any indications of lack of control?
e- What to do next?
Question 3: Workers at a packaging operation shovel a granular product from a large pile into sacks that are then sealed and placed on pallets for shipping. A sequence of 25 subgroups each consisting of the weights of 5 sacks has been recorded as follows: Observations Subgroup # Sack 1 Sack 2 Sack 3 Sack 4 Sack...
a- What is the appropriate control chart that can be used by the quality engineer in this case?
b- Determine the control limits (show your calculations).
c- Construct the appropriate control chart for the data above using MINITAB.
d- Is the process in-control?
If not, when does the out-of-control behavior occur?
e- If the process is found to be out of control, drop the out-of-control points and use MINITAB to re-construct the control chart.
f- Is the process now in-control? If not, what to do next?
Question 4: Viscosity is one of the important quality characteristics of paste ink used in printing presses. A viscosity measure is taken at the end of production of each batch of ink. Viscosity measures for 50 consecutive batches have been recorded as follows: Sample Viscosity Sample Viscosity.
a- What is the appropriate control chart that can be used by the quality engineer in this case?
b- Determine the control limits (show your calculations).
c- Construct the appropriate control chart for the data above using MINITAB.
d- Is the process in-control?
If not, when does the out-of-control behavior occur?
e- If the process is found to be out of control, drop the out-of-control points and use MINITAB to re-construct the control chart.
f- Is the process now in-control? If not, what to do next?
Paper For Above Instructions
Quality engineering, an essential aspect of manufacturing, aims to enhance product quality and process efficiency through various statistical methods and control charts. This paper will address four questions related to the analysis of manufacturing processes, using various quality control techniques such as the construction of control charts and identification of special causes of variation.
Question 1: Burrs in Screws
The first task involves examining the presence of burrs in wood screws using control charts. To find the centerline, we compute the average number of screws with burrs. Let’s assume that out of 300 screws, 15 had burrs.
The centerline (CL) would equal this average, which can be calculated as follows:
CL = Total Number of Burrs Observed / Number of Subgroups
In a scenario where 3 subgroups yield a total of 45 burrs, we find that:
CL = 45 / 3 = 15
Next, we determine control limits to assess process variability. Assuming a standard deviation of burrs in the population is known or can be estimated, control limits can be established.
UCL (Upper Control Limit) = CL + 3 * (Standard Deviation / sqrt(n))
LCL (Lower Control Limit) = CL - 3 * (Standard Deviation / sqrt(n))
Using MINITAB, we can create a control chart. If certain observations vary outside the control limits, they indicate special causes of variation, such as changes in material or equipment malfunction.
Next steps could involve investigating these outliers to determine root causes and implementing corrective actions such as staff retraining or process adjustments.
Question 2: Radar Dish Nonconformities
The analysis of nonconformities in radar assemblies follows a similar approach. Starting with the determination of the centerline for nonconformities noticed in a sample of 25 assemblies, mathematical averaging will be necessary. If we again see 100 total nonconformities observed, the calculation would follow suit.
CL = 100 / 25 = 4
Control limits are calculated similarly. If standard deviation values from earlier analyses yield sufficient data, practitioners can further evaluate control limits and potential nonconformity causes.
MINITAB will assist in developing charts for this information; if observations line up outside preset limits, further investigation regarding production practices must ensue.
Question 3: Weights of Sacks
Question three introduces an examination of sack weights containing a granular product. Appropriate control charts will depend on data characteristics. If we are measuring the weight of five sacks in each of 25 subgroups, the X-bar chart is advisable.
Calculating control limits involves determining the average weight (mean) of all sacks combined, and the respective standard deviation across subgroup measurements:
CL = Average Weight
UCL = CL + 3 * (Standard Deviation / sqrt(n))
LCL = CL - 3 * (Standard Deviation / sqrt(n))
Charts generated via MINITAB will indicate process control states, and necessary adjustments will follow if the process is determined out of control.
Question 4: Viscosity of Ink
In the case of ink viscosity assessment, continuous monitoring is vital. The use of an X-bar chart will be fitting for this scenario. Records maintained over 50 batches will show averages required for control limits.
Establishing these bounds follows similar formulas as previous calculations, and implementing MINITAB will assist in ongoing adjustments based on observed outcomes. Failure to remain within limits signals immediate need to evaluate viscosity control methodologies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, effective quality engineering relies heavily on statistical analysis and control charts to ensure product quality. By systematically evaluating each manufacturing process, manufacturers can identify trends, detect anomalies, and maintain high-quality standards vital to customer satisfaction and business success. Continuous review of processes and adherence to statistical controls will foster an environment that supports excellence in manufacturing.
References
```