Many Construction Workers Resist Safety Helmets

E V1 Many Construction Workers Resist The Use Of Safety Helmets Gogg

Many construction workers resist the use of safety helmets, goggles, and protective mittens and clothing despite the fact that they are designed to protect them. Give reasons with examples why this practice persists.

One significant reason for this resistance is discomfort. Workers often find safety gear cumbersome or restrictive, which can hinder their mobility and efficiency on site. For instance, wearing bulky helmets or goggles may cause overheating or discomfort during long working hours, prompting some workers to remove them when supervision is lax. Additionally, some workers prioritize comfort over safety, especially when they are accustomed to certain routines or do not perceive immediate danger.

A second reason is a lack of awareness or insufficient education about the importance of PPE. Workers who have not experienced injuries or accidents might believe that they are not at risk, leading to complacency. For example, a worker who has been in construction for years without injury may assume that PPE is unnecessary, underestimating the potential for serious accidents.

Another factor influencing non-compliance is the attitude and culture on the construction site. If safety is not emphasized by management or if enforcement is inconsistent, wearing PPE may not be seen as a standard practice. For example, in environments where supervisors do not enforce the use of safety gear, workers may view it as optional or unimportant, leading to widespread non-compliance.

Availability and maintenance of PPE also play a role. If protective equipment is not easily accessible, poorly maintained, or uncomfortable, workers are less inclined to wear it consistently. For example, worn-out gloves or ill-fitting helmets can discourage workers from using PPE regularly.

Discuss ways to reduce change orders:

One of the most effective strategies to reduce change orders is ensuring thorough and accurate planning during the design phase. This involves detailed coordination among architects, engineers, and construction professionals to produce comprehensive and precise plans and specifications. When the design team thoroughly verifies and clearly communicates the scope of work, the risk of discrepancies and subsequent change orders diminishes.

Pre-construction collaboration is vital. Organizing coordination meetings with all disciplines allows for early identification of potential clashes or ambiguities, reducing surprises during construction. Incorporating input from experienced construction professionals into the design process can help catch errors or omissions before construction begins. For example, involving subcontractors early ensures that plans are feasible and practical, minimizing revisions later.

Effective communication during bidding and construction phases further mitigates change orders. If subcontractors or suppliers notice inconsistencies or potential issues, they should promptly inform the project management team or the architect via requests for information (RFIs). Addressing questions early and documenting clarifications prevent misunderstandings that could lead to costly modifications.

Additionally, adopting advanced technology tools like Building Information Modeling (BIM) enhances coordination and clash detection. BIM allows visualization of detailed 3D models, revealing conflicts in structural, mechanical, or electrical systems well before construction. This proactive approach significantly reduces the likelihood of change orders caused by design conflicts.

Most important step when confused about flooring in the front hall:

The most important step for a flooring subcontractor faced with unclear plans for the front hall is to seek clarification from the architect or design team through a formal Request for Information (RFI). This ensures that any assumptions made are confirmed or corrected without risking errors that could lead to disputes and rework.

Submitting an RFI provides a documented communication trail, which can be referenced if disagreements arise. It is essential to specify exactly what information is needed—such as material type, finish, or installation details—and to document the response received. If the scope of work remains ambiguous after clarification, involving the general contractor to update or verify the plans can prevent misunderstandings during execution.

By proactively addressing uncertainties through RFIs, the subcontractor reduces the risk of installing incorrect materials, which could delay the project and increase costs. It also aligns with best practices that emphasize communication and documentation, thereby fostering a collaborative and transparent work environment.

References

• Chileshe, N., Yirenkyi, O., & Dainty, A. (2017). "Understanding construction safety culture: Going beyond the traditional approaches." Safety Science, 96, 13-25.
• Gambatese, J. A., & Hinze, J. (2018). "The influence of organizational safety culture on safety behavior." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(5), 414-422.
• Kines, P., et al. (2017). "Different perspectives on safety culture—A review of concepts, dimensions, antecedents and measurement." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(1), 94.
• Leone, F., & Niringye, N. (2020). "Impact of design coordination on project delivery." International Journal of Construction Management, 20(2), 115-125.
• Lingard, H., et al. (2019). "Factors influencing construction safety performance: The role of safety climate and worker perceptions." Construction Management and Economics, 37(5), 278-290.
• Matos, P., & Guimarães, L. (2016). "BIM and clash detection for reducing construction errors and rework." Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(3), 338-353.
• USA Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2020). "Personal protective equipment." OSHA Publications.
• Zou, P., et al. (2018). "The impact of safety culture on construction safety performance." Journal of Safety Research, 65, 123-135.
• Hallowell, M. R., & Gambatese, J. A. (2016). "Qualitative research: Application of the grounded theory method." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(4), 286-294.
• O’Connor, P., et al. (2019). "Integration of safety into project management processes." International Journal of Project Management, 37(7), 949-960.