Many Nongovernmental Organizations And Government Agencies

Many Nongovernmental Organizations Ngos And Government Organizations

Many nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and government organizations often work side by side on the same problem. To prepare for this Application Assignment, explore the web pages of the organizations provided in your Learning Resources, this week, to learn about the work they are doing. Look for one health issue that you can see in both the NGO and government organizations for this assignment. To complete this Application Assignment, write a 2- to 3-page paper that summarizes and compares the roles and function of one governmental and one nongovernmental organization (NGO) public or global health organization for a specific health issue. Be sure that your summary includes information about the following: Where are the organizations' headquarters located? What is the mission or purpose of these organizations? What populations do they serve? And what do they do? How are the organizations funded? Are they part of a larger public health infrastructure? Do these organizations mention collaboration with any other agencies or organizations? Are there any major public health issues these organizations are currently focusing on? What might be some ethical issues that are related to the mission of these organizations? (If the organizations have a code of conduct or ethics statement, provide a brief summary in your description.) Summarize what you learned in researching these organizations: What were the most interesting things you learned in this application? How are the organizations you selected similar or different? Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week's Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources, as required.

Paper For Above instruction

In analyzing the collaborative efforts of governmental and nongovernmental health organizations, it is essential to understand their distinct roles, structures, and partnerships. For this comparison, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a representative government organization and the American Heart Association (AHA) as a prominent NGO have been selected to illustrate their operations concerning cardiovascular health, a significant global health concern.

Overview of the Selected Organizations

The CDC, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, functions as the primary federal agency for protecting public health in the United States and globally. Its mission centers on preventing disease, injury, and disability through research, policy development, and health promotion. The CDC serves diverse populations across age, socioeconomic, racial, and geographic lines, emphasizing vulnerable groups such as minorities and those in underserved regions. Funding for the CDC primarily comes from federal government allocations, supplemented by grants and partnerships with other public health entities. It is an integral component of the U.S. public health infrastructure, collaborating with organizations like WHO and state health departments. Ethical considerations underpin its efforts, emphasizing transparency, scientific integrity, and respect for human rights, as detailed in the CDC’s ethics code.

The American Heart Association, based in Dallas, Texas, operates as a nonprofit NGO dedicated to fighting cardiovascular disease and stroke. Its mission is to promote healthier lives through education, research funding, and policy advocacy. The AHA primarily serves the general public, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and at-risk populations at a global level, focusing on awareness campaigns, community programs, and research grants. The organization’s funding stems from donations, sponsorships, and grants. Although not part of a government infrastructure, the AHA collaborates extensively with government agencies such as the CDC and the NIH to align its programs with national health priorities. Its core ethical principles include integrity, accountability, and respect for beneficiaries, guided by its set of organizational ethics policies.

Roles, Functions, and Collaboration

The CDC’s role in combating cardiovascular disease involves epidemiological surveillance, promoting evidence-based interventions, and supporting policy development to reduce risk factors. Its functions extend to training healthcare providers and conducting research. The CDC’s collaborations with entities like WHO facilitate global health initiatives. The CDC also partners with state and local health departments, leveraging a network that enhances disease prevention strategies across jurisdictions.

The AHA plays a moredirect role in community engagement and advocacy. It develops educational materials, conducts awareness campaigns (such as World Heart Day), funds research through grants, and influences public health policies at various levels. The AHA’s collaboration with government agencies ensures continuity of care and dissemination of scientifically backed information, which amplifies their effectiveness—highlighting a synergistic relationship essential to tackling cardiovascular health.

Current Public Health Focus & Ethical Issues

The CDC’s current focus includes reducing the prevalence of smoking, improving hypertension control, and addressing health disparities related to cardiovascular diseases. It emphasizes prevention and health promotion programs tailored to high-risk populations. Ethical issues for the CDC involve ensuring equitable access to interventions and safeguarding personal health data, adhering to confidentiality and informed consent principles.

The AHA’s current emphasis is on promoting healthy lifestyles, cardiac rehabilitation programs, and advancements in research to develop new treatments. Ethical considerations include maintaining transparency in funding allocations, ensuring unbiased research, and respecting patient autonomy and confidentiality.

Research Insights and Personal Reflection

Research into these organizations revealed their complementary roles: the CDC’s broad epidemiological oversight and policy leadership and the AHA’s targeted community advocacy and education. An interesting insight was how their collaborations extend beyond national borders, influencing global health agendas on cardiovascular issues. Both organizations prioritize ethical integrity in their operations, demonstrating that public health success depends not only on scientific intervention but also on maintaining public trust through ethical conduct.

While both organizations aim to improve cardiovascular health, their operational scopes differ—one as a governmental authority with regulatory power, the other as a community-focused NGO emphasizing education and research funding. Their synergy exemplifies how public and private sectors can work together effectively to address shared health challenges.

References

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/prevention.htm
  • American Heart Association. (2023). About Us. https://www.heart.org/en/about-us
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases
  • American Public Health Association. (2021). Public health ethics and COVID-19. https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/ethics
  • National Institutes of Health. (2022). Research on Heart Disease. https://www.nih.gov/research-training/medical-research-initiatives/heart-disease
  • Society for Public Health Education. (2019). Health Promotion Strategies in Practice. https://www.sphe.org
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2021). Managing High Blood Pressure. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/high-blood-pressure
  • United Nations. (2019). Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. https://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/
  • Frieden, T. R. (2017). Evidence for public health action: Surveillance, prevention, and control. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(4), S3-S6.
  • Room, R. (2017). Ethical principles in public health policy-making. Public Health Ethics, 10(2), 177-187.